Helen Rosner

Helen Rosner

@hels.bsky.social

“Zizek if he was a woman and loved sandwiches” New Yorker staff writer, dept. of mastication It’s always Free Palestine 🍉

73K followers556 following4.8K posts

I never really connected with fandom as a concept, but I think about how obsessed I am with my 4-year-old daughter, who is the funniest coolest cleverest most complex and most fascinating person who’s ever existed, and I’m like wow okay is this sort of how some people feel about Taylor Swift?

The problem is I need the fandom to be larger. We need forums. We need merch. I need someone to be issuing breathless Anya Updates posts about extremely mundane things (she let me put her hair in milkmaid braids today!) and have the dispatches be met with utter hysterics

This week I wrote about Good Time Country Buffet, an East Village replica of a turn-of-the-millennium southern country buffet—so freakishly faithfully rendered, so uncanny in its simulacrum, that it kind of breaks the mechanism by which we judge restaurant quality www.newyorker.com/culture/the-...

newyorker.comAn All-You-Can-Eat Time MachineGood Time Country Buffet, in the East Village, is a painstaking homage to a turn-of-the-millennium Southern steam-table joint.

I would also like to note that I called NYC a “heathen city” and since that description passed TNY’s checking department it’s now settled fact

You cannot even imagine the galaxy-brain off-label shit we get up to in the rosacea community. We’re buying oral-dose horse dewormer at Tractor Supply and rubbing it on our faces. We’re using Afrin on the *outsides* of our noses. We’re putting eye drops in places you’ve never even heard of.

My husband just came home from the store with a giant bag of Terra Chips “because I wanted to feel like I was on an airplane!”

We’re at most fourteen days away from Taylor Sheridan announcing a new show called LINEMAN starring like, Malin Akerman as a freakishly smart huge bitch busy fending off her overproofed-dough-husband’s horny bucket bunnies

Decided tonight’s plans were worth a spritz of my prize possession—a 20yo bottle of original-formula Gucci Envy—and jesus christ every single time I forget this is just the actual most intoxicating and mesmerizing and falling-thru-infinity scent that has ever existed in the history of time and space

Ok I just want to time-check that it’s been about 110 minutes since this post, and we’re only now getting the first clutch of people who are very angry at me because they believe me to be saying exactly the opposite of what I’ve written

Helen Rosner@hels.bsky.social

Whether or not ppl cutting off their parents is an actual phenomenon (is it, really?) or just clicky outrage bait, anti-estrangement is a paternalistic, socially regressive position — it’s so similar to being anti-divorce that the two are virtually indistinguishable.

Whether or not ppl cutting off their parents is an actual phenomenon (is it, really?) or just clicky outrage bait, anti-estrangement is a paternalistic, socially regressive position — it’s so similar to being anti-divorce that the two are virtually indistinguishable.

Michael Hobbes@michaelhobbes.bsky.social

This is a quietly metastasizing moral panic

View full thread

Obviously the pain of being cut off is real! But I guess I don’t understand why the social crisis is their pain—the phenomenon’s upshot—when the real crisis is clearly the phenomenon’s cause: parent-led parent-child relationships that the child finds intolerable.

Why does it always take me until like the sixth post in the thread to figure out my main point. There should be a lesson here for me about writing drafts and iterating ideas. I will not learn that lesson.

Helen Rosner@hels.bsky.social

Obviously the pain of being cut off is real! But I guess I don’t understand why the social crisis is their pain—the phenomenon’s upshot—when the real crisis is clearly the phenomenon’s cause: parent-led parent-child relationships that the child finds intolerable.

Whether or not ppl cutting off their parents is an actual phenomenon (is it, really?) or just clicky outrage bait, anti-estrangement is a paternalistic, socially regressive position — it’s so similar to being anti-divorce that the two are virtually indistinguishable.

Michael Hobbes@michaelhobbes.bsky.social

This is a quietly metastasizing moral panic

View full thread

As with anti-divorce arguments, the underlying premise here is that any explicit break in the family is a grave moral violation. And the underlying premise *there* is that some family members get to be immune to consequence, and others are prevented from complaint. Imagine defending that!

It’s telling that the cut-off parents in these sob stories are almost always cut off by daughters—we socialize women not just to absorb abuse, but to misinterpret abuse as bids for care. Meanwhile men are socially expected to distance themselves from their natal families anyway.

Whether or not ppl cutting off their parents is an actual phenomenon (is it, really?) or just clicky outrage bait, anti-estrangement is a paternalistic, socially regressive position — it’s so similar to being anti-divorce that the two are virtually indistinguishable.

Michael Hobbes@michaelhobbes.bsky.social

This is a quietly metastasizing moral panic

It is fascistic and misogynistic and honestly also pretty embarrassing to argue that familial relationships should be the moral exception to freedom of association!

It’s bonus mega embarrassing that the overwhelming tack of these articles is concern for the feelings & experiences of the cut-off—giving them personhood and agency, while withholding same from the people doing the cutting off. (I also simply do not care if some cutting-offers are “overreacting”!)

Person in my @‘s rn is on a generational run of solution rejection: “restaurant portions are too big” > “ok but I’d feel silly bringing half home” > “ok but some dishes reheat poorly.” My god, imagine having such expert-level agency over your misery and refusing to deploy those skills for happiness!

Skill issue sorry

batrobin.bsky.social@batrobin.bsky.social

Going to a restaurant is paying for overpriced mediocre food served in smaller portions that frankly leave you hungry. We maybe go out once a month if that much now. One main plate between the two of us and maybe an appetizer, and a couple of glasses of wine that cost as much as a bottle in store

If only there were people out there. people whose jobs. their jobs. their jobs were like to critique restaurants. critics. but for restaurants. and you could rea

Actually no! The food is generally the least important part of our satisfaction calculus. Emotion, convenience, social connection, community (real or perceived)—all can outweigh mediocre or even terrible food. Regardless, I didn’t say the food is not very good. I said the restaurant is.

Ministry Of Truth@truthministry.bsky.social

Why would anyone go to a restaurant that serves not-very-good food? Serious question Isn't that the POINT of a restaurant? To serve good food?

I don’t want to harp on this too hard but reducing things to “food” evinces a pretty shallow understanding of what a restaurant is (and how enjoyment functions). Do you have a favorite dish or favorite restaurant colored by nostalgia? Congratulations, the food is less important than the emotion.

I’m still not entirely sure what to make of Faux, Keith McNally’s son’s restaurant, which is not very good, but also sort of precious & special in the specificity of its not-very-goodness. I can’t figure out if I even like it. I like what I wrote about it, though! www.newyorker.com/culture/the-...

newyorker.comGeorge McNally’s Brasserie InheritanceWith the opening of Faux, in Tribeca, Keith McNally’s son steps into the family business. Is it ambition or hubris?

Is this your notebook?? It mysteriously appeared in my tote bag. No personal info but the owner seems to live in Brooklyn and is outlining/researching a novel — I’d love to return it to you!

It’s a fucking trip to start watching The Diplomat if you, like me, have spent the last few years listening to the Hawthorne & Horowitz audiobooks

I’ve been wondering why everyone I professionally interact with keeps referring to me by an outdated job title and it turns out (1) I have a Wikipedia page i forgot about and it’s wrong, and (2) I have a personal website I forgot about and it’s wrong too

One of the things I love love love about getting older is that so many of my things got older with me. I love that I’ve had my dishes and flatware for over a decade. I love that my living room rug has been with me for 20 years. I love that my winter coat has seen so many winters.

If gretchen’s stunning coinage of “babyproofing” here doesn’t become regular critical jargon I’ll kms

I'm not a King purist, nor a CARRIE purist, but if your changes to a story make it less complicated and less interesting, I think what you're doing should be understood less as adaptation and more as babyproofing

The three Flavors are whipped cream, roast chicken gravy, and Cold Can Of Sprite. All other flavors and all foods are simply combinations of or aspiring to achieve these three true Flavors.

After much observation, I have concluded that the brunette hundred-thousandaire IVF moms of brownstone Brooklyn are all wearing ass-accentuating brown barrel-cut trousers with slightly shrunken royal blue sweaters

Helen Rosner reposted

There are NOT machine-made clothes. If there were, your clothes would be made in the country you live in (where the customers are), or in China (where machines are cheap). They’re made in Bangladesh or India or Indonesia because that’s where the LABOUR is cheap. Your clothes are made by people.