Mathias Hong

Luttig: "House Republicans are now poised to claim that the midterm elections were stolen from them when they meet on January 3 to decide which members-elect will be seated in the 120th Congress." Would the Supreme Court intervene? "At least we *hope* it will, but can we be sure with this court?"

"So enthralled with the forty-seventh president are today’s House Republicans that they long ago abandoned everything the Republican Party has stood for since its founders first met in Ripon, Wisconsin, in 1854."

Luttig: "House Republicans are now poised to claim that the midterm elections were stolen from them when they meet on January 3 to decide which members-elect will be seated in the 120th Congress." Would the Supreme Court intervene? "At least we *hope* it will, but can we be sure with this court?"

"Before..., it was the Republicans who professed to stand for the Constitution... Republicans were the proud party of Abraham Lincoln and Ronald Reagan. It was our party that could be expected to put country before party when the time came ..."

Luttig: "House Republicans are now poised to claim that the midterm elections were stolen from them when they meet on January 3 to decide which members-elect will be seated in the 120th Congress." Would the Supreme Court intervene? "At least we *hope* it will, but can we be sure with this court?"

"This is also the court that has cynically authorized Trump’s lawlessness for the past two years through its aptly named “shadow docket,” without so much as briefing, argument, or written opinion. But surely by now this court must understand what it has wrought for the U.S. and the Constitution..."

Luttig: "House Republicans are now poised to claim that the midterm elections were stolen from them when they meet on January 3 to decide which members-elect will be seated in the 120th Congress." Would the Supreme Court intervene? "At least we *hope* it will, but can we be sure with this court?"

"I don’t intend to be overly sanguine about this Supreme Court. This is the court that shattered the one constitutional truth in the U.S. since 1789 that “no man is above the law” and placed Donald Trump of all presidents above the law in Trump v. United States."

Luttig: "House Republicans are now poised to claim that the midterm elections were stolen from them when they meet on January 3 to decide which members-elect will be seated in the 120th Congress." Would the Supreme Court intervene? "At least we *hope* it will, but can we be sure with this court?"

"It will never be a nonjusticiable political question whether the ... House of Representatives by simple majority vote can refuse to seat a member elected ... in a free and fair election on the pretextual and unsupported assertion that the member-elect’s election was tainted by fraud."

Luttig: "House Republicans are now poised to claim that the midterm elections were stolen from them when they meet on January 3 to decide which members-elect will be seated in the 120th Congress." Would the Supreme Court intervene? "At least we *hope* it will, but can we be sure with this court?"