Danny Robb

Danny Robb

@inverting-vision.bsky.social

Writing about history of science, exploration, and technology. Interested in photography + robotics in lunar and planetary science, oceanography, cryosphere. Work in JSTOR Daily, Aeon, Atlas Obscura, The Space Review. History Blog: invertingvision.com

631 followers799 following281 posts

Pinned

60 years ago, the Lunar Orbiter team took the first photograph of the Earth from the Moon. You'll often see the restoration by LOIRP, but I actually prefer the original, with all the artifacts of the image-creation process. Here's the story of Frame 102, mostly told through images: #histSTM 🗃️🔭

invertingvision.comCreating the First Photograph of the Earth From the Moon: A Visual HistoryOn August 23, 1966, the team behind NASA’s Lunar Orbiter I captured the first image of Earth as seen from the Moon. You will sometimes see an updated version of this image, in fantastic resolution …
View full thread

Danny Robb reposted

In the 17th c., scientific publications were filled with "reports of monsters, strange weather, and other singularities," D+G write. 🧵 Good BHL post covering one example - Gaspar Schott's Physica Curiosa: blog.biodiversitylibrary.org/2013/05/monsters-scientific-revolution-and #histsci 🗃️ #SciArt

Danny Robb@inverting-vision.bsky.social

Re-reading Objectivity by Daston+Galison. Was always curious about images that didn’t make it into the book. This time I’m looking them up (and looking deeper into some that did make it). Keeping a log of them as I go, and figured I would share. First up, Decamps vs Civiale: #histsci 🗃️ #SciArt 🧵

Danny Robb reposted

"I can never get pants that fit."

Danny Robb@inverting-vision.bsky.social

These often came from reports by local observers. In the BHL post, Grace Constantino argues that compiling these types of observations was an important first step for analyzing them critically, and that Schott showed at least hints of a critical eye. Album from BHL: www.flickr.com/photos/biodi...

In the 17th c., scientific publications were filled with "reports of monsters, strange weather, and other singularities," D+G write. 🧵 Good BHL post covering one example - Gaspar Schott's Physica Curiosa: blog.biodiversitylibrary.org/2013/05/monsters-scientific-revolution-and #histsci 🗃️ #SciArt

Danny Robb@inverting-vision.bsky.social

Re-reading Objectivity by Daston+Galison. Was always curious about images that didn’t make it into the book. This time I’m looking them up (and looking deeper into some that did make it). Keeping a log of them as I go, and figured I would share. First up, Decamps vs Civiale: #histsci 🗃️ #SciArt 🧵

View full thread

In the 17th c., scientific publications were filled with "reports of monsters, strange weather, and other singularities," D+G write. 🧵 Good BHL post covering one example - Gaspar Schott's Physica Curiosa: blog.biodiversitylibrary.org/2013/05/monsters-scientific-revolution-and #histsci 🗃️ #SciArt

Danny Robb@inverting-vision.bsky.social

Re-reading Objectivity by Daston+Galison. Was always curious about images that didn’t make it into the book. This time I’m looking them up (and looking deeper into some that did make it). Keeping a log of them as I go, and figured I would share. First up, Decamps vs Civiale: #histsci 🗃️ #SciArt 🧵

View full thread

Often concerned with "ideal" conceptions of nature, anomalies = monsters in the eyes of 17th c. scientists. Sadly, this often meant ascribing this term to people and animals with deformities. Lots of these in Schott.

To D+G, these "monstrosities" could prompt more precise illustrations, rather than the idealized images scientists usually produced. These were "meant to hinder premature generalizations and promote exact observations of particulars..." (p. 67)

In the 17th c., scientific publications were filled with "reports of monsters, strange weather, and other singularities," D+G write. 🧵 Good BHL post covering one example - Gaspar Schott's Physica Curiosa: blog.biodiversitylibrary.org/2013/05/monsters-scientific-revolution-and #histsci 🗃️ #SciArt

Danny Robb@inverting-vision.bsky.social

Re-reading Objectivity by Daston+Galison. Was always curious about images that didn’t make it into the book. This time I’m looking them up (and looking deeper into some that did make it). Keeping a log of them as I go, and figured I would share. First up, Decamps vs Civiale: #histsci 🗃️ #SciArt 🧵

Danny Robb reposted

Fun thing! I'm looking at a copy of a book of summaries of Aristotle’s natural philosophy (Naturalis totius philosophiae paraphrases (1538)), and the book has a semi-circle mirror set into the backboard. Has any one seen this elsewhere? What's going on? A device to connect up with the Aristotle?

Danny Robb reposted

🌕 Big missions aren't the only way to discover the Moon. Through the Moon Explore initiative, @esa.int is developing a new generation of smaller, faster missions to investigate the lunar environment and its resources. 🔗 Find out more: www.esa.int/Science_Expl...

esa.intSmall lunar missions, big ambitionsEurope is preparing for a future in which astronauts, robots and scientific instruments work on and around the Moon. While major missions often capture the headlines, smaller missions can move faster,...

Danny Robb reposted

Replying to @squigglyvolcano.bsky.social

My favourite bit of reporting for this story was finding out ISS astronauts were growing little gardens in their quarters in secret—and only this summer have NASA explicitly permitted them to do this. Astronauts are, in many ways, just regular, hopeful humans. 🌱

Danny Robb reposted

Re-reading Objectivity by Daston+Galison. Was always curious about images that didn’t make it into the book. This time I’m looking them up (and looking deeper into some that did make it). Keeping a log of them as I go, and figured I would share. First up, Decamps vs Civiale: #histsci 🗃️ #SciArt 🧵

Re-reading Objectivity by Daston+Galison. Was always curious about images that didn’t make it into the book. This time I’m looking them up (and looking deeper into some that did make it). Keeping a log of them as I go, and figured I would share. First up, Decamps vs Civiale: #histsci 🗃️ #SciArt 🧵

View full thread

Brevern also includes this interesting pair of photographs used by Alexander Nasmyth in 1874. Meant to illustrate the early 19th c. geological theory that mountains came from a cooling/shrinking/buckling Earth. This was likened to an aging hand or drying apple.

Re-reading Objectivity by Daston+Galison. Was always curious about images that didn’t make it into the book. This time I’m looking them up (and looking deeper into some that did make it). Keeping a log of them as I go, and figured I would share. First up, Decamps vs Civiale: #histsci 🗃️ #SciArt 🧵

View full thread

Jan von Brevern wrote about Civiale: doi.org/10.1017/S026... Civiale tried to comprehensively document the Alps in 40 panoramas, over 600 photos. Brevern highlights the utility of the "unexpected" in scientific photos, as supplement to "objective." He took this pic of the pano above:

Re-reading Objectivity by Daston+Galison. Was always curious about images that didn’t make it into the book. This time I’m looking them up (and looking deeper into some that did make it). Keeping a log of them as I go, and figured I would share. First up, Decamps vs Civiale: #histsci 🗃️ #SciArt 🧵

Painting above is "Rocky Bay South of Salerno with View of Capri": hvrd.art/o/165005 D+G quote Henry James saying Decamps "painted, not the thing regarded, but the thing remembered." I chose Rocky Bay because they contrast Decamps' style with that of Aimé Civiale's 1866 Alps photos:

They share the Paris Academie des Sciences' description of his panoramas as "'faithful representations of the accidents' of the earth's surface." They use the contrast to demonstrate how, to many in the mid 19th c., the scientific and artistic selves were "diametrically opposed." (p. 37)

Centaur delays caused a big headache for Surveyor planners, and contributed to the decision to spin off Lunar Orbiter. Among the many engineering problems may have been a more human one: lack of enthusiasm

Danny Robb reposted

As expected, the Prime Minister's promise to sort out the mess of funding for Jodrell actually meant nothing - it seems the government would like it to be some sort of heritage theme park when you can go and see where we used to do science. 🔭

Margot Finn@eicathomefinn.bsky.social

'The University of Manchester is seeking alternative funding sources to keep scientific work at Jodrell Bank going after hearing that lost UK Research and Innovation funding would not be restored despite interventions by the prime minister.'

Danny Robb reposted

Interesting insights by @drspacejunk.bsky.social

SpacePolicyOnline@spacepolicyonline.bsky.social

From Leonard David's new article on preserving Moon Heritage: "We've reached an inflection point where spacecraft craters aren't just new archaeological sites, they're an environmental hazard that may cause irreversible damage," [Alice] Gorman told Space.com." www.space.com/astronomy/mo...

Danny Robb reposted

genuinely one of the most important people of the 20th century -- not just pioneer, not just moon landing programmer, but also a programmer on the project that first discovered chaos in the 1950s

bryan newbold@bnewbold.net

ah damn, RIP Margaret Hamilton. she took safety-critical software engineering seriously, and got people to the moon and back. news.mit.edu/2026/margare...

Danny Robb reposted

The Apollo guidance code that Margaret Hamilton led is available online! It was scanned and shared openly. Her legacy will live on in the fundamentals of software engineering that she created that still form the basis for software design for many space missions. github.com/chrislgarry/...

github.comGitHub - chrislgarry/Apollo-11: Original Apollo 11 Guidance Computer (AGC) source code for the command and lunar modules.Original Apollo 11 Guidance Computer (AGC) source code for the command and lunar modules. - chrislgarry/Apollo-11

Danny Robb reposted

On October 7, 1959, Luna 3 gave us our first look at the far side of the Moon. Today, NASA released the preliminary science reports from Artemis II. Reposting my visual history of lunar far side exploration, which I wrote while watching Artemis II: 🗃️🔭 #histSTM invertingvision.com/2026/04/06/e...

invertingvision.comExploring the Far Side of the Moon: A Visual HistoryLunar exploration has always held a strange position in the history of exploration. For all of human history, people have been staring up at the Moon, and for centuries astronomers used telescopes …

On October 7, 1959, Luna 3 gave us our first look at the far side of the Moon. Today, NASA released the preliminary science reports from Artemis II. Reposting my visual history of lunar far side exploration, which I wrote while watching Artemis II: 🗃️🔭 #histSTM invertingvision.com/2026/04/06/e...

invertingvision.comExploring the Far Side of the Moon: A Visual HistoryLunar exploration has always held a strange position in the history of exploration. For all of human history, people have been staring up at the Moon, and for centuries astronomers used telescopes …

Here's a great thread from @maniacalstar.bsky.social with links to the Artemis reports, and lots of great highlights: bsky.app/profile/mani...

HEXandra@maniacalstar.bsky.social

Three reports out today! • Preliminary Science Report – initial analysis of science data within the ten science themes chosen for this mission • Lunar Science Operations Report – how the science team worked across three rooms and 250,000 miles • Data User Guide – how to navigate PDS

Danny Robb reposted

It’s October 7, six months since the Artemis II mission, which means it’s time for the Lunar Science Team to release their initial reports and all that good science data! There’s five hours of science joy at the LSSW, and I’ll be sharing along the way. (All thoughts/opinions my own.)

sservi.nasa.govLSSWThe series of Lunar Surface Science Workshop (LSSW) short, focused virtual sessions will continue to solicit input from the community on the potential for new scientific research that could be enabled...