Peder M Isager

Peder M Isager

@isager.bsky.social

Associate professor at Oslo New University College. Dungeon Master. Website: http://pedermisager.netlify.app

389 followers98 following103 posts

Peder M Isager reposted

My article "Three-Sided Testing to Establish Practical Significance" with @jackfitzgerald.bsky.social is now published in AMPPS! journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/... Three-sided testing is an improved version of TOST that lets you test for equivalence, superiority and inferiority simultaneously.

journals.sagepub.comSage Journals: Discover world-class researchSubscription and open access journals from Sage, the world's leading independent academic publisher.

Peder M Isager reposted

New episode of Nullius In Verba! We discuss the jingle-jangle fallacy, the problem of vague concepts, how the incentive structures promote vagueness, why people who prefer more rigour have to be called the validity 'police', and much more! nulliusinverba.podbean.com/e/episode-74...

nulliusinverba.podbean.comEpisode 74: Notiones Vague | Nullius in VerbaIn this episode, we discuss the problems associated with vague concepts in psychological science. We talk about the jingle-jangle fallacy, the trade-off between broad concepts and more precise…

NB: The app is coded with the help of ChatGPT Codex. I have tested it as well as I can, but it may contain bugs and errors. If you spot any, let me know and I will fix them.

I hope Causion can be of use to methods teachers and students who want to learn about causal inference and its role in statistics. The app is designed to be easy to use interactively (e.g. as part of a lecture, or to whip up an example from a course book while reading).

For many years I’ve wanted a tool to help me visualize causal inference rules, ”play out” causal mechanisms in DAGs, and quickly study what happens in data when I change something in a DAG. Causion lets me do all of this in a simple and intuitive way.

View full thread

The post is a light and practical introduction to causal inference with variable control. It assumes som familiarity with regression analysis, and it helps to read my previous posts on causal inference, but that is it. Links to more in-depth literature on the topic are provided in references.

Peder M Isager reposted

Join the next PMGS workshop where @ambra-prg.bsky.social will explain how to use Quarto for your reproducible research! 🔓🧑‍🔬

Sajedeh Rasti@sajedehra.bsky.social

Registration is now open for our Quarto workshop at Paul Meehl Graduate School! Join us on December 12 in Eindhoven to learn how to use Quarto for reproducible research and communication. More details and registration here: paulmeehlschool.github.io/2025-11-03-q...

View full thread

Quantifying replication value as a combination of citation count and sample size is our first stab at solving a very complex problem. Such early attempts benefit enormously from being critiqued right away. We were really lucky to receive several excellent commentaries from many experts in the field.

Thanks to all the commentary authors for your contributions, and thanks especially to the editors at Meta-psychology especially for allowing us to test out this format for our publication. It was a long road, but the end result is in my opinion terrific!

This paper forms one of Meta-Psychology’s Special Topics. Eight commentaries have been published alongside the paper which criticizes and extends the ideas presented within. We have written a response to these commentaries here: open.lnu.se/index.php/me...

open.lnu.seLnuOpen | Meta-PsychologyBakker, B. N., Bomm, L., & Peterson, D. (2025). Commentary on Isager et al. (2021) Reflections on the Replication Value (RV) and a Proposal for Revision. Meta-Psychology, 9. https://doi.org/10.15626/MP.2024.4324

Peder M Isager reposted

I built a DAG diagram with garden hoses for teaching. Pictured: a collider bias diagram, inspired by a blocked pipe situation I experienced (which I credit with giving me the intuition though it also ruined my belongings in the flooded cellar).

Extremely honored to recieve Oslo New University College's science award for 2025. ONH has been a fantastic base to conduct my research at for the past 4 years, and I have an amazing team of colleagues around me to thank for that. From the bottom of my heart, thank you all!

Peder M Isager reposted

Okay everyone, things are getting serious. I’m going to teach research methods again, 1st year psychology undergraduates. What would you cover with respects to philosophy of science, the research process etc.? I’m not very happy with the textbook stuff so I’m open to all ideas!

Peder M Isager reposted

An abbreviation (ABB) in a journal article (JA) or Grant Application (GA) is rarely worth the words it saves. Every ABB requires cognitive resources (CR) and at my age by the time I'm halfway through a JA or GA I no longer have the CR to remember what your ABB stood for.

I understand that sensible causal inference based on (cross-sectional) correlations can be hard. Very hard. But that does not mean our goal should not be causal inference. If a network modeling approach invalidates any causal inference, I question the usefulness of such a modeling approach.

Later on the authors recommend abductive inference. I agree with the recommendation. However, abduction that leads us to a causal conclusion is just causal inference by another name. Saying that causal inference is not allowed is not sage advice. Better to emphasize that causal inference is hard.

I mean, randomized control is usually mentioned in any explanation, but why is randomization to begin with? Why does randomization and manipulation give experiments a leg up on observational research when it comes to causal inference? This blog post is an attempt to explain why, briefly.

"Those who cannot do, teach" is, I think, another sacred cow of academia. "Those who cannot teach, do" strikes me as equally true. A good teacher seems more valuable to the academy than a good researcher, on average.

The idea that if you're a poor researcher you should automatically be assigned to teach instead makes about as much sense as the idea that if you're a poor teacher you should automatically be assigned to do research instead.

Peder M Isager reposted

Replying to @lakens.bsky.social

I often talk about the need for psychology to improve. That is because I think it is worth improving. It would be very helpful if I could easily provide a few dozen examples of the contributions that have been made to support that conviction. I know they exist. I would just like them in one place.

Peder M Isager reposted

My editorial on how journals can earn trust. We often use journal names as proxies for quality. This is bad bc it’s not valid. But it could be. Editors could make journal name a valid signal. And we could place value on journals that show us how they do that. journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10....