Jan R. Wessel

Jan R. Wessel

@janw.bsky.social

Clement T. & Sylvia H. Hanson Family Chair, Professor Cognitive Control Collaborative guy, #FirstGen wessellab.org | cognitivecontrol.net

1.3K followers117 following184 posts

Couldn't be prouder of Darcy or happier to have her return to the Midwest! Great news for UWM.

Darcy Waller@darcywaller.bsky.social

I’m so happy to share that I’ll be starting as an Assistant Professor of Psychology at the University of Wisconsin-Madison in Fall 2027! I'm incredibly excited to head back to the Midwest, get to work with an incredible group of colleagues, and live in beautiful Madison, WI. 🦡🎊

New preprint from the lab. We think we have a solution (two, actually) to a long-standing problem in the field of response inhibition. Using two different mathematical approaches, we think we can identify long-hypothesized inhibitory 'trigger failure' trials. More in🧵 www.biorxiv.org/content/10.6...

biorxiv.orgTwo types of response inhibition failures in humansResponse inhibition is a key control function that allows humans to perform safe, goal-directed behaviors. The dominant behavioral-computational model holds that response inhibition fails when the inh...
View full thread

We also tested the long-standing hypothesis that stop-signal TF result from attentional failure, but find little evidence to support this claim. Prestimulus alpha power and stimulus-related visual N1 ERPs were identical between TF and successful stop trials. If anything, non-TF trials were abnormal.

This shows 3 things: - Trigger failures are a real, distinct category of response inhibition failure - They show distcint behavioral & EEG patterns predicted by existing TF theories - They reflect a genuine failure to initiate cognitive control. I hope this approach can be useful for years to come!

New preprint from the lab. We think we have a solution (two, actually) to a long-standing problem in the field of response inhibition. Using two different mathematical approaches, we think we can identify long-hypothesized inhibitory 'trigger failure' trials. More in🧵 www.biorxiv.org/content/10.6...

biorxiv.orgTwo types of response inhibition failures in humansResponse inhibition is a key control function that allows humans to perform safe, goal-directed behaviors. The dominant behavioral-computational model holds that response inhibition fails when the inh...
View full thread

So we then split the failed stop-trials into "likely TF" and "likely non-TF" trials. We first compared behavior. Strikingly, unlike non-TF trials, TF trials are not faster than typical go-trials. That makes sense, since go-speed shouldn't matter if you don't ever initiate inhibition!

Then, we dug deeper into EEG signatures. In line with the single-trial correlation analysis, the binary split shows that stop-signal trigger failures do not have a stop-signal P3! To us, that is the strongest evidence that there are indeed trials in which no inhibition ever takes place.

New preprint from the lab. We think we have a solution (two, actually) to a long-standing problem in the field of response inhibition. Using two different mathematical approaches, we think we can identify long-hypothesized inhibitory 'trigger failure' trials. More in🧵 www.biorxiv.org/content/10.6...

biorxiv.orgTwo types of response inhibition failures in humansResponse inhibition is a key control function that allows humans to perform safe, goal-directed behaviors. The dominant behavioral-computational model holds that response inhibition fails when the inh...
View full thread

So then we went and checked whether these single-trial probabilities actually reflected something that's "real". And indeed, trial-wise p(TF) was highly correlated with spatiotemporal clusters of trial-wise EEG after the stop-signal. Fronto-central activity was particularly anticorrelated with p(TF)

Then, we used Gaussian mixture modeling to test whether p(TF) is unimodally distributed, or results from two generative processes. If trigger failures and 'speed failures' are distinct, binary outcomes, then one would expect a highly bimodal mixture distribution. That's exactly the case.

New preprint from the lab. We think we have a solution (two, actually) to a long-standing problem in the field of response inhibition. Using two different mathematical approaches, we think we can identify long-hypothesized inhibitory 'trigger failure' trials. More in🧵 www.biorxiv.org/content/10.6...

biorxiv.orgTwo types of response inhibition failures in humansResponse inhibition is a key control function that allows humans to perform safe, goal-directed behaviors. The dominant behavioral-computational model holds that response inhibition fails when the inh...
View full thread

So I suggested Stein try jackknifing: run the model once with each failed stop-trial held out. If mean TF rate goes down, the trial is likely a trigger failure (and vice versa). Stein first developed are more efficient implementation of BEESTS to enable this computationally intensive approach.

But Stein didn't stop there. He also derived an analytical solution to single-trial TF probability using the BEESTS model parameters and likelihood ratio testing. Despite being fundamentally different approaches (numerical v analytic), jackknifing and LR return highly correlated parameter estimates.

New preprint from the lab. We think we have a solution (two, actually) to a long-standing problem in the field of response inhibition. Using two different mathematical approaches, we think we can identify long-hypothesized inhibitory 'trigger failure' trials. More in🧵 www.biorxiv.org/content/10.6...

biorxiv.orgTwo types of response inhibition failures in humansResponse inhibition is a key control function that allows humans to perform safe, goal-directed behaviors. The dominant behavioral-computational model holds that response inhibition fails when the inh...
View full thread

In the aughts, Dora Matzke (and later Andrew Heathcote) developed a computational model ("BEESTS") that can capture the mean rate of these trigger failure trials in behavior. This model has been superbly productive in studies that correlate per-subject TF rates with brain activity and other factors.

However, the big limitation of the BEESTS model is that it cannot identify which individual trials are trigger failures. Therefore, TF are essentially hypothetical entities. To test whether they are real, qualitatively distinct trials from other inhibitory failures, we need a trial-wise method.

New preprint from the lab. We think we have a solution (two, actually) to a long-standing problem in the field of response inhibition. Using two different mathematical approaches, we think we can identify long-hypothesized inhibitory 'trigger failure' trials. More in🧵 www.biorxiv.org/content/10.6...

biorxiv.orgTwo types of response inhibition failures in humansResponse inhibition is a key control function that allows humans to perform safe, goal-directed behaviors. The dominant behavioral-computational model holds that response inhibition fails when the inh...

For four decades, the dominant behavioral-computational model in the field of response inhibition has been the horse-race model. This model holds that response inhibition fails for only one reason: because the inhibition process was too slow to intercept the response.

However, people have long speculated that there may be a 2nd type of inhibitory failure: trigger failure trials, on which no inhibition process is ever initiated. This can be inferred from inhibition functions with >0 intercepts - i.e., inhibition fails even if a stop-signal is presented right away.

Jan R. Wessel reposted

A special highlight of our work on precision fMRI of the prefrontal cortex

WCIA 3 News@wcia3news.bsky.social

Out of the 30 million MRIs performed in the United States every year, data shows about 22% of those are on the brain. Now, researchers at the University of Illinois are mapping out ways to see the results at a more detailed level.

We're excited to welcome three new post-docs to the lab this month: Dr. Chenye Bao (University of Missouri) Dr. Gizem Filiz (Washington University in St. Louis) Dr. Veronica Zarr (University of Utah) Exciting times ahead!

Jan R. Wessel reposted

Interested in timing, motor control, attention, working memory and/or stuttering? ⌛️ Curious to see how we try to bring these together in one study? 🧐 Check out our most recent, hot-off-the-press manuscript, born out of fun cross-field and cross-lab discussions ✨ Very excited to see this out ☀️🍾

Brain and Cognition Lab@brognition.bsky.social

🧵 New paper led by @irenetxeberria.bsky.social in press at Current Biology! A collaborative effort between the Brain and Cognition Lab and the Brain, Speech & Language Lab ⭐ Does the temporal organisation of action selection differ in stuttering? www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti... A thread 👇

Jan R. Wessel reposted

We're hiring a full-time Lab Manager for the Cognitive Flexibility Dynamics Lab at the University of Maryland, studying cognitive control via brain recording, stimulation, and computational modeling. Ideal for research experience before grad school: cfd-lab.com/join

The final version of this is now out at Cortex: www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti... Thanks much to @russpoldrack.org and two other reviewers for highly constructive feedback on the earlier version, and especially to @annemscheel.bsky.social, who suggested Cortex and edited the paper.

sciencedirect.comsciencedirect.com
Jan R. Wessel@janw.bsky.social

I reviewed 5+ fMRI papers on response inhibition within roughly the last year, and the same points come up over and over again. So I wrote a short note last week entitled "The unique limitations of BOLD-fMRI in the study of response inhibition". You can read it here. osf.io/preprints/ps...

Jan R. Wessel reposted

Jan R. Wessel reposted

Thrilled to be featured in the @thetransmitter.bsky.social Liftoff Series! Grateful for the opportunity to share more about our launching lab's ethos and the big questions surrounding mechanisms of affect and mental health we aim to tackle in the coming years! 🧠

The Transmitter @thetransmitter.bsky.social

In this month’s “Liftoff,” @marisosa.bsky.social discusses the challenges and excitement of task-switching as a new PI, and @debyee.bsky.social shares how she plans to foster a culture of reproducibility in her lab. #neuroskyence By @franciscorr25.bsky.social www.thetransmitter.org/liftoff-new-...

First, we found that the pupil response once again tracked conscious error awareness. Moreover, atomoxetine indeed significantly changed this phasic pupil dilation response to errors. So the causal manipulation of phasic autonomic reactivity to errors worked.

However, crucially, conscious error detection rates did not differ at all between placebo and atx. As such, we can safely conclude that autonomic nervous system activity indexes – but does not causally contribute to – conscious error detection. The End.

Here, we tested whether this blunted orienting response to errors causally contributes to conscious error detection (as predicted by some theories) or not. 30 healthy older adults performed an error awareness on 80mg atomoxetine (an sNRI to modulate autonomic responsivity) and on placebo.

As a child, I always thought scientists learned by thinking hard until they have a great idea or insight. As a scientist, I mostly learn by realizing exactly how every great idea or insight I think I have is actually dumb and trivial. Anyway I just spend Saturday night in the lab for no reason.

Jan R. Wessel reposted

Here's a list of things I'd rather do than try to open NWB data: - Chew on a ball of tinfoil - Drive an icepick into my eye socket - Take a full gainer into a cesspool - Watch James Harden play basketball List to be continued...

Jan R. Wessel reposted

Headed to #SOBP2026? Come visit our posters on stress and mental effort! F325: Investigating the Role of Serotonin in Stressor Controllability and Mental Effort Allocation (me!) S297: Learning and Generalization of Stressor Controllability for Mental Effort allocation (Tony El Nemer)

Jan R. Wessel reposted

📣 Postdoc in Human Neurophysiology & Neurorehab 📣 The Real-Time NeuroRehabilitation Lab at the U of Iowa is hiring a Postdoctoral Research Scholar! Motor control, EEG/TMS, neurorehabilitation, and real-time multimodal methods. 📅 Summer/Fall 2026 📧 sara-hussain@uiowa.edu Please share!

New work, now out in PLoS Biology. Using intracranial recordings & EEG, we find that the human STN rapidly engages / releases motor inhibition depending on task context, does so in tight accord w/ frontal cortex, and shows little to no lateralization while doing so. journals.plos.org/plosbiology/...

journals.plos.orgA cortico-subthalamic circuit rapidly engages and releases inhibition of specific movements depending on the environmental contextHow does the human brain stop movements under realistic conditions? Using intracranial recordings and multi-variate EEG decoding, this study shows that a fronto-basal ganglia circuit featuring the sub...
Jan R. Wessel@janw.bsky.social

New preprint from the lab, led by post-doc @cheolsoh.bsky.social and former post-doc Mario Hervault (now Asst Prof at UGrenoble). The boys used synchronous intracranial recordings from the human subthalamic nucleus & EEG to study β bursts during global & selective response inhibition. Details in 🧵

We are EXTREMELY stoked that the Cognitive Control Collaborative is adding a sixth lab this year, as Debbie Yee will join us as a new Asst Prof in the UI Psych department! Great times ahead, can't wait!!!

Debbie Yee@debyee.bsky.social

I'm SO pleased to announce that I'll be starting as an Asst Prof at @psychiowa.bsky.social this August. The lab will focus on neural & computational mechanisms of motivation, affect, & decision-making, with the aspirational goal of translation to neuropsychiatric disorders. 🧠 yeelabneuro.com

Here's an updated version of this paper. Unrelatedly if anyone knows how I can tweak my OS to explode my computer if I ever start a word document with the words "The limitations of SSRT..." please send me a fax. osf.io/preprints/ps...

osf.ioOSF
Jan R. Wessel@janw.bsky.social

I reviewed 5+ fMRI papers on response inhibition within roughly the last year, and the same points come up over and over again. So I wrote a short note last week entitled "The unique limitations of BOLD-fMRI in the study of response inhibition". You can read it here. osf.io/preprints/ps...