jhemann.bsky.social
futurism.com/artificial-i... They're calling it the dead moodle theory
www.newyorker.com/news/fault-l.... Students, like other humans, are utility optimizing beings with imperfect knowledge and a bias for short term benefits. Expecting otherwise is like being mad at water for going downhill. Incentives matter. Always have.
For America's 250th, Morpheus narrates a history channel documentary video on grace hopper. The sentence just gets better and better until I want to yell "Bingo!" at the end. youtu.be/GCP9mjjA-MI?...
www.wsj.com/us-news/educ... There does come a time to pull up stakes, and it could come sooner than some of those in the middle of things might see. Retrenchment in academia doesn't have to be a bad thing, and handled right higher ed as a whole could come out stronger as a result.
jhemann.bsky.social reposted
jhemann.bsky.social reposted
Engineering management after the cost of code collapsed: “Investing in machine-checkable correctness is now among the highest-leverage infrastructure work an org can fund” karimjedda.com/engineering-...
hemann.pl/floc26/ If you are as overwhelmed as I was by #FLoC26 and all the events, you might find it useful to look at the daily sessions side-by-side.
www.nytimes.com/2026/07/06/u... Man alive. I feel like our research university ecosystem is such a bargain for the material and downstream benefits you get.
jhemann.bsky.social reposted
Evidence that Anthropic is using prompt stenography to track whether Claude Code is being used by certain labs and certain web domains thereallo.dev/blog/claude-...
www.nytimes.com/interactive/... This is so cool. Developing small, minimal models, generative recursion, understanding how systems work. Such neat stuff.
jhemann.bsky.social reposted
www.dailycal.org/news/campus/... Part of my job is to be a motivator and coach. "Giving free potato chips outside the gym" isn't a strong enough analogy for the perverse incentives that my CS1 students face. I mean, surely "getting hooked on drugs" overstates the harm level. Got a better analogy?
27. Once you understand how to write a program get someone else to write it. I'm think about putting the whole list as perlis.md at the top of my repo.
www.theverge.com/column/93902... Thank you EU. I'm surprised that the direct preferences of consumers weren't already sufficient motivation to want to do this.
Would love to read this, but it's paywalled and obviously I'm not going to pay for it. www.theatlantic.com/technology/2...
wasp.sh/blog/2026/05... Really thought provoking piece, about a real world use case. The temptation to draw broader lessons ot1h, and otoh, both survivorship bias and Sustrik's Law.
jhemann.bsky.social reposted
cacm.acm.org/blogcacm/the... I do believe we're going to be spending a good deal of time in the near future figuring out just what "neurosymbolic" is supposed to mean in practice.
jhemann.bsky.social reposted
www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2... Yeah, I wonder what happened. Total mystery. Can't figure it. No correlations with anything that I can think of.
jhemann.bsky.social reposted
The deluge of disruptive news from around the globe is making it hard for researchers to focus on their day-to-day work go.nature.com/4s5bGSc
Reading GEB yesterday taught me something I'd missed until now. Nats are a minimally expressive set of values that your PL needs to express quines; a program that prints its own Godel number is a quine; the Godel number is its printed repr. Many langs use other hacks just bc they under support nats.
I sure find it interesting to see what other disciplines are doing in these troubled times. www.scientificamerican.com/article/why-...
I knew about steganographic images, but I didn't know about this similar phenomenon in music: mixmag.net/feature/spec.... It really kind of reminds me of GEB, somehow. But I have GEB on the brain this semester.
slop.zackg.me I don't like that my score was measurably improved because I knew some of the papers by title. Jeez.
www.quantamagazine.org/the-man-who-... Wow, this rewrites history. I skipped forward a bit, but the parts I didn't know were fascinating.