Joe Marsh

Joe Marsh

@jmarshlab.bsky.social

94 followers80 following18 posts

Joe Marsh reposted

How do computational predictors compare with experimental assays (MAVEs) for variant classification? Across five hereditary cancer genes, MAVE scores were more conservative (fewer pathogenic calls) yet more decisive (fewer indeterminate calls) after ACMG/AMP calibration. doi.org/10.1186/s130...

doi.orgCombining MAVEs and computational predictors improves variant classification across ancestries in hereditary cancer genes - Genome MedicineBackground Many commonly used computational tools for variant effect prediction exhibit ancestry-related bias because they are trained on clinical or population datasets that under-represent global di...

Our AVE Variant Effect Predictors resource now covers non-coding predictors too! Big thanks to Ben Livesey for building the original and Tesni Walsh for taking on the much messier non-coding landscape. Missing a method? Send it our way 👇 www.varianteffect.org/veps/ @uoe-igc.bsky.social

varianteffect.orgVariant Effect PredictorsComputational approaches can leverage variant effect data for functional interpretation
Atlas of Variant Effects Alliance@varianteffect.bsky.social

Our Variant Effect Predictors (VEPs) resource now includes non-coding variants! You can also find updated guidance on using and submitting VEPs. Developed by the Marsh lab (@edinburgh-uni.bsky.social), we caught up with @jmarshlab.bsky.social to learn more: tinyurl.com/2rkxextw

New preprint from the lab! We used deep mutational scanning to measure the effects of nearly all amino acid substitutions in XPD/ERCC2. Our assay is strongly mechanism-selective, showing better discrimination between different disease phenotypes (TTD vs XP) than any computational predictors.

biorxiv.orgMechanism-selective deep mutational scanning distinguishes ERCC2 disease phenotypesPathogenic ERCC2 variants cause xeroderma pigmentosum (XP), trichothiodystrophy (TTD) or both, yet variant effect scores are usually interpreted only as measures of pathogenicity rather than of which ...

Joe Marsh reposted

📣 Interested in non-coding disease-causing variants? Check out our review "Mechanisms underlying disease-causing variants in promoters and enhancers". Interesting mechanisms, challenges and future perspectives. Great to work with @wbickmor.bsky.social, Kun and Ryan! www.nature.com/articles/s41...

nature.comMechanisms underlying disease-causing variants in promoters and enhancers - Nature GeneticsThis Review discusses how rare-disease-causing variants in the noncoding genome impact gene regulation, why these examples are so few and how new approaches could accelerate discovery of noncoding var...
Wendy Bickmore@wbickmor.bsky.social

It was great working with students Kun and Ryan and @hannahlong.bsky.social, combing the literature to try and find examples of bona fide disease-causing variants in non-coding elements - promoters, enhancers and silencers. www.nature.com/articles/s41...

New work led by Hasan Cubuk: moving from interpreting variants individually to combining both alleles in recessive disease. DMS of >8000 ADSL variants → inferred enzyme activity → additive biallelic scores that track patient phenotypes. Great collab with the Kudla lab! www.cell.com/cell-systems...

cell.comMechanistic modeling of recessive disease through allelic integration of variant effectsRecessive diseases arise from the combined effects of two alleles, yet most variant interpretation methods consider variants individually. Çubuk et al. map more than 8,000 variants in the recessive en...

Joe Marsh reposted

As we move towards a complete map of human variant effects, evaluating VEP and MAVE scores in clinically meaningful ways becomes essential. In work led by Yifei Shang and @jmarshlab.bsky.social, we explore mean evidence strength (MES) to quantify clinical utility after ACMG/AMP calibration.

bioRxivpreprint@biorxivpreprint.bsky.social

Clinical evidence yield as a framework for evaluating computational predictors and multiplexed assays of variant effect https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.03.27.714777v1

Joe Marsh reposted

New preprint on how disagreement among variant effect predictors can help guide prioritization of proteins for experimental analysis Work led by Nicolas F Jonsson in a collaboration with Joe Marsh. Preprint: doi.org/10.64898/202... @vxh357.bsky.social @jmarshlab.bsky.social 1/6

bioRxiv Bioinfo@biorxiv-bioinfo.bsky.social

Disagreement among variant effect predictors guides experimental prioritization of target proteins https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.03.18.712765v1

Joe Marsh reposted

Happy to share that 𝚊𝚌𝚖𝚐𝚜𝚌𝚊𝚕𝚎𝚛 is now on CRAN! 🎉 This means long-term stability and easy installation with: 𝚒𝚗𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚕.𝚙𝚊𝚌𝚔𝚊𝚐𝚎𝚜('𝚊𝚌𝚖𝚐𝚜𝚌𝚊𝚕𝚎𝚛') 🗞️ doi.org/10.1093/bioi... #rstats #acmg #varianteffect #MAVEs #VEPs #genomics

This post is unavailable.

Joe Marsh reposted

1/8 Our new paper in Nature Communications explores how often pathogenic missense variants cause disease through loss-of-function (LOF), gain-of-function (GOF), or dominant-negative (DN) effects. 📄 nature.com/articles/s41...

Find out more about a new online tool which allows researchers and clinicians to estimate likely disease mechanisms for sets of mutations, supporting better diagnosis and personalised medicine 👉 edin.ac/3W5ykw3 @mbadonyi.bsky.social @jmarshlab.bsky.social

New paper out today in PLOS Comp Biol: journals.plos.org/ploscompbiol... Intrinsically disordered regions make variant prediction deceptively easy for benign changes but very hard for pathogenic ones. Our work shows why current tools struggle here, and why disorder-aware approaches are needed.

journals.plos.orgAssessing variant effect predictors and disease mechanisms in intrinsically disordered proteinsAuthor summary Some parts of proteins, known as intrinsically disordered regions, do not fold into fixed shapes. Instead, they stay flexible and play key roles in controlling how cells work, often by ...

Joe Marsh reposted

New preprint from our group - Ben has done some great work trying to understand why computational predictors and MAVEs agree or disagree when scoring the impacts of single amino acid substitutions

Ben Livesey@bjlivesey.bsky.social

Check out our latest preprint: "Why variant effect predictors and multiplexed assays agree and disagree". Now available on BioRxiv www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1... @marshlab.bsky.social @uoe-igc.bsky.social

Excited to share this new method for gene-level calibration of MAVE and VEP scores that Mihaly has been working so hard on!

Mihaly Badonyi@mbadonyi.bsky.social

We've developed a method to align genetic variant effect scores with ACMG/AMP classification criteria. It has two key advantages: (1) no assumptions about score distributions, and (2) consistent outputs without user tuning.

Joe Marsh reposted

Joe Marsh reposted

Joe Marsh reposted

Following our variant effect predictor (VEP) guidelines paper last week, we’re excited to announce another publication in Genome Biology today—the latest iteration of our VEP benchmarking efforts. With so many VEPs released recently, how do we choose the best ones? 🌐 doi.org/10.1186/s130...

doi.orgVariant effect predictor correlation with functional assays is reflective of clinical classification performance - Genome BiologyBackground Understanding the relationship between protein sequence and function is crucial for accurate classification of missense variants. Variant effect predictors (VEPs) play a vital role in decip...

Traditional benchmarks often face circularity issues, inflating performance estimates. In this study, led by Ben Livesey, we use deep mutational scanning (DMS) datasets from 36 human proteins to benchmark 97 VEPs, introducing a novel pairwise comparison method for fairer rankings.

In contrast to suggestions that DMS-based benchmarks might not reflect clinical utility, we demonstrate a striking correspondence between VEP performance in functional assays and clinical variant classification. Explore the full paper for insights into top-performing VEPs.

Had a good time discussing variant effect predictors on this podcast, thanks for having me!

Atlas of Variant Effects Alliance@varianteffect.bsky.social

🆕 🎧 Podcast Episode “Deep Thought” We can predict the weather, but can we predict genetic diseases from your genome? Learn about variant effect predictors (VEPs) with experts Drs Debbie Marks and Joe Marsh #Podcast #Science #AI #VariantEffectPredictor 🎙 www.varianteffect.org/podcast

Joe Marsh reposted

📣 We are advertising for a postdoc to join our team at the University of Edinburgh! Our lab studies gene regulatory mechanisms in development, and how genetic changes may impact these processes to alter development and shape human craniofacial form and function 🧬🧪

elxw.fa.em3.oraclecloud.comPostdoctoral ResearcherOur research is focused on understanding how genetic changes in the non-coding genome can impact gene regulatory mechanisms, alter developmental processes and ultimately affect human craniofacial shap...

Check out our new preprint and Google Colab notebook if you are interested in predicting the molecular mechanisms of missense disease phenotypes. We find that gain-of-function and dominant-negative effects are very common, and that many disease genes are associated with multiple distinct mechanisms

Mihaly Badonyi@mbadonyi.bsky.social

1/ Excited to share our latest work on the "Prevalence of loss-of-function, gain-of-function and dominant-negative mechanisms across genetic disease phenotypes". @marshlab.bsky.social @uoe-igc.bsky.social www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...

New review out! 🧬🔬 We explore how protein structure is improving variant effect prediction. Advances in structural modelling, including AlphaFold, are powering methods like AlphaMissense, PrimateAI-3D, and CPT-1, leading to better accuracy and interpretability. www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...

sciencedirect.comLeveraging protein structural information to improve variant effect predictionDespite massive sequencing efforts, understanding the difference between human pathogenic and benign variants remains a challenge. Computational varia…

Joe Marsh reposted

Happy to see our predictive scores integrated into DECIPHER! We hope they will help clinicians uncover the molecular mechanisms driving dominant disease. Huge thanks to the team at @deciphergenomics.bsky.social for their support. A follow-up study is underway to improve predictions—stay tuned!

deciphergenomics.bsky.social@deciphergenomics.bsky.social

Protein predictive scores which predict the likelihood that the protein is associated with a dominant-negative, gain-of-function or loss-of-function mechanism are displayed. Curated literature support for a molecular disease mechanism is also shown jmarshlab.bsky.social @mbadonyi.bsky.social

You are up to date.