Matt Hodges

Matt Hodges

@matthodges.bsky.social

Working on AI for Democrats. Before: Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton. ATX

1.5K followers296 following689 posts

Matt Hodges reposted

The only reason anyone is talking about Marissa Mayer or Dazzle is that her marketing team understands how to deploy rage bait, and most of the Internet still can't spot it in the wild.

My electronic ballot marking device broke in the middle of voting today. I didn’t have to cast a provisional ballot as I feared. It just spit my blank ballot out and I started over on another machine. Poll workers were very on top of it.

My [now discarded] Roborock vacuum also hallucinated and attempted to call tools that connect to severs in China.

Mark Riedl@markriedl.bsky.social

Qwen3 occasionally hallucinates beyond the prompt and, tho rarely, attempts to call tools that connect to severs in China and Singapore cohere.com/blog/concern... It is likely an artifact from extensive RL training and probably innocuous.

Matt Hodges reposted

Over 2,000 alumni from Vivek’s all-boys catholic high school in Cincinnati have signed and circulated a petition demanding that he pull the ad and issue a public apology for “ignoring the moral responsibilities” of his Jesuit education. I think he’s pretty cooked.

Micah@rincewind.run

chat I don’t think doubling down on this ad is working out real well for vivek

Matt Hodges reposted

Replying to @dollspace.gay

But the original question was whether anyone would actually pay enough for AI inference to sustain an industry of this magnitude. Well, they're paying. In industrial quantities.

Matt Hodges reposted

The bears said the economics would require an absolutely obscene amount of revenue to work, and Anthropic apparently responded, “Yes. Correct.” 💀

Matt Hodges reposted

Replying to @peark.es

Net revenue retention of *900%* is completely off the charts. That's as-of Sept 30, definition below.

Matt Hodges reposted

Replying to @matthodges.bsky.social

Depends on the definition. Just about anyone with a wired internet connection is within miles of the nearest POP.

I know it’s not the point being made here, but do we have data on what % of Americans live within three miles of a potential data center?

This post is unavailable.

Everyone wants to talk about the 20-something with a poorly-defined political identity, but I want to talk about the Amusing Ourselves To Death of American civic discourse.

brent 🌹🗽@therealbrent.bsky.social

my god

Matt Hodges reposted

Replying to @qjurecic.bsky.social

CNBC guy posts all-caps headline, doesn’t include a link, cites an unnamed AP reporter, mentions that the information was seen on X, and tags Reuters. We need to talk more about this kind of social media brain rot. It’s not just glonzo stuff; it’s a complete breakdown of verifiability and context.

I like this cartogram! Periodic reminder that maps are for answering "where" not "how much" but we smoosh those two ideas in Congressional dataviz. You can't really do both (big New Jersey!). Congressional lines are administrative artifacts, and it's ok (good!) to discard that when counting.

Karim Douieb@karimdouieb.bsky.social

So every seat gets the same space here. Seat by seat (@cookpolitical.com): 214 favor Democrats, 200 favor Republicans, 21 toss-ups decide the majority.

Matt Hodges reposted

That 13% to ads seems very low for any candidate with TV spend, unless you're marking the entire outlay to a media consultant as "consulting" and not "pass through media buying" (see my Platner piece where I walk through this cauldronllc.substack.com/p/how-did-th...)

cauldronllc.substack.comHow did the Platner campaign spend their money?mostly on ads and consulting. so much ads and consulting.
Jake Grumbach@jakemgrumbach.bsky.social

We found that as of right now 73% of your campaign donation goes back to the consultants and vendors (!!!), four times more than just 20 years ago. Only 13% to ads. Even I was shocked.

It's a little weird to be mad that only 13% of a donation goes to buying ads — as if what the people really want is more campaign ads — especially if a few paragraphs later you're going to talk about how ads don't work. It's also a little weird to lump lawyers into fundraising acquisition.

There's a lot in the article to commend. You won't find me arguing that there aren't big problems with how the Party prioritizes and allocates money, voter contact, and donor contact. But in many places the authors clearly took the opportunity to add swipes at their favorite bugbears.

Matt Hodges reposted

Replying to @phillipcarter.dev

how are we expected to turn a profit selling the random number four (4) when others are simply giving away much larger random numbers

The thing about building an entire political identity around sophomoric edgelord memes is that once you’re in power, people remember they hate edgelords.

“We found some Americans who moved to Europe and hated it.” “We found some Californians who moved to Texas and hated it.” “We found some New Yorkers who moved to Florida and hated it.” It’s a meme now to seek out people who don’t like a place and turn that into a story.

WIRED@wired.com

The internet told them Europe was a social paradise. Turns out the trains are awful, the health care isn’t free, and people can be really mean.

Tommy Teepell’s dad Timmy

Marisa Kabas@marisakabas.bsky.social

Huge follow-up reporting to my scoop: The Guardian confirmed America Next—the conservative nonprofit founded by Bobby Jindal that was offering students $ to disrupt El-Sayed events—paid a firm registered to Tommy Teepell’s dad Timmy $250k for “canvassing and influencer marketing” against El-Sayed.

I wanna see the Nathan Fielder movie but I have less than zero desire to argue with strangers on the internet over armchair parasocial psychology about Elizabeth Holmes.

Politically speaking, I know that people feeling "locked in" to their super low mortgage rate is a salient issue a lot of households feel. But personally speaking, I have a hard time feeling relative sympathy for people who timed the market and won.

We're about to get a flood of breathless retrospectives on what AI did or didn't accomplish this election. They'll focus almost entirely on voter-facing slop, confidently declare which campaigns did and didn't use AI, and draw sweeping causal conclusions from what little they can see.

The version of this that I hate the most is, “my kids aren’t school-aged anymore so none of my tax dollars should go towards my community’s schools.” There’s a certain type of person who believes everything is oppression unless they can articulate a one-to-one personal transaction.

Zoognosis with Joy!@zoognosisjoy.bsky.social

I saw this monstrosity earlier so now you have to as well

It’s because the property tax payment is “hidden” inside the monthly payment via escrow and people genuinely don’t know they’re doing it until the mortgage is over.

Regime Accountant, CPA ☠️🎢@regimecpa.bsky.social

You should pay property taxes but only when you have a mortgage is a bizarre belief

Also, property tax is a form of wealth tax and I feel like there’s a political lesson we could be learning here but I don’t think we’re learning whatever it is.