Matthew Lawrence reposted
This looks like a really interesting event. If I were going to be in NYC, I'd be there ... www.ticketsource.com/open-society...
Matthew Lawrence
@mblawrence.bsky.social
Law professor at Emory Law. Admin law, health law, addictions. Addiction and Liberty: https://www.cornelllawreview.org/2023/04/26/addiction-and-liberty/ Selected works: https://works.bepress.com/matthew-lawrence/
6.4K followers584 following186 posts
Matthew Lawrence reposted
This looks like a really interesting event. If I were going to be in NYC, I'd be there ... www.ticketsource.com/open-society...
@marknevitt.bsky.social and I have been shouting for months that the long-term military appropriations in the OBBA (the ones that will steal the next House's influence over federal armies by any name) are unconstitutional. Awesome to see @democracyforward.org file a complaint raising that claim.
Link to full complaint is on the plaintiffs' webpage here: democracyforward.org/news/press-r...
A cool first for me to have one of my articles, "Against the Safety Net," translated into Traditional Chinese. Thanks to Huai-En Chen for careful engagement, and if you're curious about the original I'll link in the first comment. ennassw.medium.com/%E8%A7%A3%E6...
The original: scholarlycommons.law.emory.edu/faculty-arti...
Matthew Lawrence reposted
What should administrative law look like after the critique of transsubstantivity? How can it be make sensitive to context without sacrificing important cross-cutting procedural values? Today, @mblawrence.bsky.social shares insights from his recent work on institutional design and drug scheduling.
Delighted to have a post today in @lpeblog.bsky.social talking applied admin law, transsubstantivity, and drug scheduling. lpeproject.org/blog/doing-a...
Matthew Lawrence reposted
Very interesting looking new piece from Joseph Blocher and David Pozen! balkin.blogspot.com/2026/09/cons...
This is huge news, but the devil will be in the details. The history of settlements leading to actual public health benefits is murky, and industry standards can wind up benefiting industry in long run. A reason for those concerned to pay more attention to tech harms now, not less.
BREAKING: Meta reaches a $17 billion settlement with dozens of states to resolve teen social media addiction cases.
A great article on public health and settlements, but there are many others: law.stanford.edu/publications... Also I joined Lubin and coauthors in discussing what a social media settlement ought to look like here: pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40376949/
Serious bipartisan legislation to end shutdowns could inadvertently give away Congress's last, best tool to influence how the military gets used. Awesome to partner with @marknevitt.bsky.social and Emory Law 2L Amelia Powell in @lawfaremedia.org today. www.lawfaremedia.org/article/shut...
Matthew Lawrence reposted
Replying to @jbentonheath.bsky.social
This required me to integrate discussions across a range of issue areas—some of which I teach regularly in admin law, and some new to me. I am grateful for the work of @sbagen.bsky.social @mblawrence.bsky.social & more on appropriations law issues. See, e.g., papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.... 7/x
For health law teachers: Here is a summer supplement addressing HR1, AI, admin law, and executive power developments relevant to health law courses. My coauthors and I hope this helps those teaching health law whether they use The Law of American Health Care or not! papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
Wow, thank you Emily Hammond for a very thoughtful review of "Second-Class Administrative Law"! adlaw.jotwell.com/putting-a-hu...
Matthew Lawrence reposted
This is a super interesting and important take. Concerns about a standing army bar the way we are funding the military.
Some key takeaways from new work with @marknevitt.bsky.social: 🚫Funding the military long term through reconciliation is unconstitutional 🚫Long-term military funding in OBBA is unconstitutional ❓Maybe ICE funding too 🚫Tapping the Judgment Fund for defense procurement contracts is unconstitutional
Some key takeaways from new work with @marknevitt.bsky.social: 🚫Funding the military long term through reconciliation is unconstitutional 🚫Long-term military funding in OBBA is unconstitutional ❓Maybe ICE funding too 🚫Tapping the Judgment Fund for defense procurement contracts is unconstitutional
The Framers included a structural check on standing armies and military power in the Constitution. Matthew B. Lawrence and Mark Nevitt (@marknevitt.bsky.social) argue it is now time for its revival:
Matthew Lawrence reposted
This is a fantastic paper -- well worth your time to read!
Lawrence and Nevitt on the Two-Year Clause and Military Appropriations Matthew B. Lawrence and Mark Nevitt (both Emory University School of Law) have posted Reviving the Military’s Term Limit (G.W. L. Rev. (forthcoming)) on SSRN. Here is the abstract: This Article argues for the revival of a…
Matthew Lawrence reposted
Thanks to @lsolum.bsky.social for highlighting “Reviving the Military’s Term Limit,” co-written with @mblawrence.bsky.social legaltheoryblog.com/2026/04/16/l... @jacklgoldsmith.bsky.social @curtbradley.bsky.social @rgoodlaw.bsky.social @bobbychesney.bsky.social @stevevladeck.bsky.social
Matthew Lawrence reposted
Was awesome to present at @yaleisp.bsky.social today and kind of amazing to realize yesterday that my twin brother Dave would be on a panel at Thurmond Arnold across campus at the same time. That has to be a first, right? Btw I presented “Platform Polarization?” papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
I love creative conlaw scholarship. Kessler and Pozen have a great article up on “epistemic discovery” as a first amendment theory that could gain real traction protecting a range of conduct from AI use to experimentation with psychedelics. tinyurl.com/3rz6k5bx.
Next up for social media may be a settlement or court ordered remedy. But we need to be careful that the relief is genuine and stops the harm. For one take on how, see my piece with a group of fantastic coauthors—“Social Media Harm Abatement.” nyaspubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/...
led by Nate Lubin with iyerland.bsky.social, alissacooper.bsky.social and several others
The debates about DHS and Iran appropriations assume the long term slush funds the OBBA gave the president for ICE and military ops are constitutional. That premise is mistaken, as @marknevitt.bsky.social and I explain in our draft, now forthcoming in GW Law Review! papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
Matthew Lawrence reposted
For the past year or so, I've been working on a project for the Administrative Conference of the United States on best practices for drafting regulatory preambles in light of recent developments in judicial review. The draft report is now available here: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.... 1/
If you’re tired of incremental marijuana rescheduling announcements and interested in the root problem with drug scheduling, or how to fix it, check out my new piece with Dave Pozen, just out in Science! SSRN version here: papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
Matthew Lawrence reposted
I know at the end of the day the work is really not about recognition but it is still rewarding to see my name in this ranking. I just remember all the struggle that went into the pieces underlying this. Thanks to Rob Willey and Melanie Knapp for putting it together. papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers....
Avi Sholkoff and I collected legal opinions leading up to the ongoing social media trial, as well as legal scholarship on addictive design, at Harvard’s Bill of Health blog here: tinyurl.com/8by82vpe
Is compulsive use of social media more like watching too much TV or getting hooked on slot machines? Kevin Yan and I bring lessons from drugs and gambling to debates about social media, including whether “addiction” is the right word when we talk about social media, here: tinyurl.com/mryv7js6
Hot off the presses, Dave Pozen’s and my new piece in @HarvLRev on what is broken in how we regulate marijuana, kratom, opioids, and other drugs—and how to fix it. Admin law meets public health meets LPE meets drug law meets harm reduction. Check it out! harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-13...
Matthew Lawrence reposted
Readers, today is the exciting launch day for my book! How to Tax the Ultrarich bit.ly/4rk6wBM In partnership with the great economic policy team @rooseveltinstitute.org A few threads will follow. 1st, the key takeaway: even w/ *this* Supreme Court, we can tax wealth at the federal level. 1/12
I have a piece in lawfare today about a wonky but important issue—the selection of a new Comptroller General and future of both “Congress’s Watchdog” and the (badly needed) stabilizing force in federal spending it provides. www.lawfaremedia.org/article/is-t...
I’m honored to join the @oneillinstitute.bsky.social's Center for Addiction and Public Policy, Taleed El-Sabawi, Regina LaBelle, and other colleagues for the "Winter Institute on Addiction Policy and the Law” CLE event on February 9-10, 2026. Register (zoom or live): web.cvent.com/event/e921a3...
Excited to be launching and co-teaching this new course at Emory Law. If you've got ideas for articles/books/strategies/challenges to share with students to help them use law to change the world for the better, despite all that stands in the way, please do share! law.emory.edu/news-and-eve...
Very wonky podcast with Eugene Volokh @hooverinstitution.bsky.social, Jane Bambauer, and me talking about how the first amendment does/doesn't limit states' ability to try to protect kids and adults from addictive design by tech companies. reason.com/volokh/2025/...
Now on SSRN: "Platform Polarization?" is forthcoming in Emory Law Journal--about the increasing politicization of social media platforms and what it means for political parties and constitutional law. tinyurl.com/h4ynwyua Comments are very welcome on the draft!
Now on SSRN: "The Missing Constitutional Law of Executive Conditions" (with Nicole Huberfeld) is forthcoming in Wash U. L. Rev--about the distinctive constitutional issues presented by presidential "regulation by deal." tinyurl.com/mrytp74z Comments very welcome on the draft!
Matthew Lawrence reposted
Well over 150 UC law faculty have just made public this open letter to the UC Regents arguing, point by specific point, for why the Regents should not accept any of the major demands the Trump administration has made of UCLA. We argue it's not a genuine settlement offer, but a form of extortion.