Michael C. Anderson

Michael C. Anderson

@memorycontrol.bsky.social

Neuroscientist at MRC Cognition an Brain Sciences Unit at the University of Cambridge, studying memory, cognitive control, and mechanisms of adaptive forgetting

1K followers257 following73 posts

Oh yeah, here is the actual paper! www.nature.com/articles/s41...

nature.comUniversal rhythmic architecture uncovers two modes of neural dynamics - Nature CommunicationsBrain oscillations are traditionally regarded as sustained rhythms. Here, the authors show that there are both high and low-rhythmicity bands, characterised by brief bursts, which can signal responses...
Michael C. Anderson@memorycontrol.bsky.social

Brilliant work by Golan Karvat redefines the spectral architecture of electrophysiological activity, expanding the identifiable bands and providing a clear definition of oscillatory/bursty bands. We propose rhythmicity as a dimension of oscillatory activity.Check it out @earlkmiller.bsky.social !

Brilliant work by Golan Karvat redefines the spectral architecture of electrophysiological activity, expanding the identifiable bands and providing a clear definition of oscillatory/bursty bands. We propose rhythmicity as a dimension of oscillatory activity.Check it out @earlkmiller.bsky.social !

Golan Karvat@golan-neuro.bsky.social

@ayeletlandau.bsky.social @memorycontrol.bsky.social #neuroscience @mrccbu.bsky.social

To my complete surprise, our Nature Reviews Neuroscience review on the Brain Mechanisms Underlying the Inhibitory Control of Thought has landed on the cover! Cover art below! For an "explainer thread", see earlier tweet. bsky.app/profile/memo... @mrccbu.bsky.social #neuroskyence #memory #ptsd

Michael C. Anderson@memorycontrol.bsky.social

How does the brain stop thoughts? Find out in my article in @natrevneuro.nature.com with Subbu Subbulakshmi & Maite Crespo-Garcia www.nature.com/articles/s41... that integrates 25 yrs of psychology and neuroscience on this vital function.@mrccbu.bsky.social sky.social #neuroskyence #neuroscience

Michael C. Anderson reposted

Michael C. Anderson reposted

Research on inhibitory control over memory provides a rich neurocognitive framework through which to understand disordered thought control.More broadly, it complements response inhibition as a tool for understanding the control of action and thought.

Addressing intrusive thinking is a vital mission in clinical neuroscience and psychiatry. Several years ago, 40 scientists from around the world gathered in an Ernst Strugman forum on Intrusive thinking, organised by Peter Kalivas and ‪@mpwpaulus.bsky.social‬ and facilitated by Julia Lupp.

Fundamentally, if neuroscience is going to inform how unwanted thoughts are controlled by the brain and address central features of psychiatric disorders, a theoretically valid construct and set of tools for measuring that construct are needed.

Critically, we review evidence that retrieval stopping of unwanted thoughts plays an important role in attenuating affective responding to suppressed content, and also that training people to suppress fearful thoughts improves their mental health. www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...

science.orgImproving mental health by training the suppression of unwanted thoughtsTraining people to suppress fearful thoughts improved mental health, especially for those with anxiety and post-traumatic stress.

In another example, hippocampal subfield CA1 volume predicts prefrontal suppression of hippocampal activity during intrusions in a retrieval stopping task, and CA1 volume reduction also predicts intrusive symptoms in people with PTSD. www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...

sciencedirect.comVariations in response to trauma and hippocampal subfield changesModels of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) suggest that the hippocampus is key to the persistence of traumatic memory. Yet very little is known ab…

Our article integrates 25 years worth of research on the cognitive and brain mechanisms underlying retrieval stoppping. Retrieval stopping shares prefrontal and striatal components with action stopping, but instead modulates hippocampal and cortical regions that represent thoughts.

To capture this fundamental difference, we introduce the concept of a FRONTO-TEMPORAL INHIBITORY CONTROL PATHWAY to capture what is distinct about mental control. This pathway has unique parameters that dictate thought stopping success that are not captured by response inhibition.

But what do we do instead? Is there another model system for inhibitory control that is conceptually relevant and well understood? YES! RETRIEVAL STOPPING. Retrieval underlies much of the thinking we do. Thoughts do not emerge from nowhere. Perceptual cues or other thoughts elicit them.

Indeed, persistent intrusive thoughts are usually retrieved in response to reminders. If so, stopping unwanted thoughts would involve recruiting inhibitory control to stop their retrieval, given a cue. This conceptualization captures every form of intrusive symptom across psychiatric disorders.

This is not a small point. Inhibitory control ability does not equate to prefrontal function. Your ability is determined by the entire circuit that implements stopping. Response inhibition measures will include influences of downstream motor circuitry irrelevant to thought stopping.

And response inhibition will NOT be influenced by parts of thought stopping circuitry unique to the latter. It's a little like testing models of audition by using a using a visual task. No matter how precise, elegant, and simple your visual task is, it's at best partially relevant to your goal.

Nevertheless, the clear importance of inhibitory control has earned it a seat at the table as a construct relevant to controlling intrusive thoughts, and more broadly, as a fundamental component of executive function. www.nature.com/articles/s41...

nature.comThe role of prefrontal cortex in cognitive control and executive function - NeuropsychopharmacologyNeuropsychopharmacology - The role of prefrontal cortex in cognitive control and executive function

But there is one problem. Stopping motor actions does not invoke thought inhibition, and cannot be used to identify its unique properties. Stopping actions must be achieved by affecting motor cortex; stopping thoughts, by affecting cortical areas represent the thought. The pathways must differ.

Inhibitory control research has exploded in the last two decades. For stopping simple actions like key presses and eye movements, we have a sophisticated understanding achieved via imaging, intracranial recording, modeling and invasive work with non-humans. www.sciencedirect.com/science/arti...

sciencedirect.comNeural mechanisms of domain-general inhibitory controlInhibitory control is a fundamental mechanism underlying flexible behavior and features in theories across many areas of cognitive and psychological s…

This work's mechanistic depth,along with simple methods of quantifying motor stopping ability, like the stop-signal task, have drawn scientists to apply its methods/lessons to understand intrusive thinking in psychiatric disorders, with variable success. www.cambridge.org/core/journal...

cambridge.orgInhibitory control and psychopathology: A meta-analysis of studies using the stop signal task | Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society | Cambridge CoreInhibitory control and psychopathology: A meta-analysis of studies using the stop signal task - Volume 16 Issue 6

So how do we stop thoughts? What does neuroscience have to say? Scientists studying intrusive thoughts have leaned on inhibitory control, a mechanism that enables us to stop. When you stop yourself from grabbing a hot pot on the stove before your burn yourself, you have inhibitory control to thank.

Indeed, in today’s world, we have much to think about; but less obviously, we also have much to NOT THINK ABOUT.The burden of things we try not to think about has grown weighty: the Ukraine war; chaotic American politics; the rise of right-wing extremism; and climate change, e.g. We all can feel it.

Critically, thought stopping is central to mental health. Intrusive thoughts are hallmark features of many disorders: Intrusive memories in PTSD; pathological worry in axiety; rumination in depression; obsessive thinking in OCD; hallucinations in schizophrenia; craving thoughts in addiction.

Should the Medical Research Council end sustained funding for its internationally renowned scientific units? 600 scientists don't think so.The UK needs sustained investment in basic science and challenge-led investments. #Neuroskyence @mrccbu.bsky.social www.timeshighereducation.com/news/nobelis...

timeshighereducation.comNobelists urge rethink on MRC unit funding changesNobel laureates back calls to pause new system of Medical Research Council funding which threatens future of well-established research units

Suppressing memories promotes resilience! Terrorist attack survivors who recovered from PTSD showed normalised inhibitory control of the hippocampus during retrieval stopping before intrusive memory declines, mitigating hippocampal atrophy. #memory #PTSD #neuroskyence www.science.org/doi/10.1126/...

science.orgPlasticity of human resilience mechanismsPTSD remission is linked to improved fronto-hippocampal inhibitory mechanisms during memory control.

Can someone forget much of their life? Yes! In Psychogenic amnesia, extreme stress leads to the loss of years of memories, including all the people the patient knows. Why? Read about what we have discovered in @laura-marsh.bsky.social‬ 's new paper or in the outstanding thread below #neuroskyence

Laura Marsh@laura-marsh.bsky.social

Happy to share our new paper on the inhibition of memory retrieval in dissociative amnesia, with @dcdace.bsky.social, Hirokazu Kikuchi, Nobuhito Abe &, Jun Kawaguchi, Mike Kopelman & @memorycontrol.bsky.social doi.org/10.1017/S003...

Sleep much? I hope so! A new fMRI study with @harrington-mo.bsky.social and @sacairney.bsky.social shows how inducing sleep loss impairs the prefrontal cortex's ability to suppress unwanted memories, and suggests that REM sleep restores this function.Congrats Marcus! @sleepdiplomat.bsky.social

Marcus O. Harrington@harrington-mo.bsky.social

🚨 Our study on how sleep deprivation affects the neural correlates of memory suppression is now published in PNAS! www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/...

Are you a fan with the MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit? If so, read this Science story and then join the 500 scientists (inc two Nobels and two former Royal Society heads), who are asking the MRC to adjust course by signing the Open Letter linked in the story. www.science.org/content/arti...

science.orgFunding overhaul threatens historic U.K. research unitsScientists protest new “challenge-led” grants replacing funding that supported long-term basic research

Michael C. Anderson reposted

Not that anyone here needs a reason to ditch twitter, BUT...I only just noticed that my twitter timeline is full of posts by people I don't follow. This is because, as of March, Musk introduced an algorithm to do this, based on what I have liked. Aggravating. I had liked my self-curated newsfeed.

Stunning. I would not have guess this would be possible.

Guillaume Lajoie@glajoie.bsky.social

Neural spiking data and Transformers are a tricky match. Temporal segmentation and tokenization are the crux. Together with an all-star team, we figured out a scalable way to solve this. The results are exciting: training and transferring on multi-sessions, multi-subjects neural decoding tasks.