Katie Mummah

Katie Mummah

@nuclearkatie.com

Nuclear engineer. nuclear: reactors, history, waste, nonproliferation, space, humor. "Tells uranium's life story". Lives in New Mexico. UW-Madison, UIUC alum. Outdoors when I'm not working. Views mine alone, like/rt not endorsements. she/her

16.7K followers2.2K following1.8K posts

Marathon Fusion is my favorite example of a startup who has done an incredible slight of hand where "make fusion energy" is somehow among their MORE REASONABLE claims. It's amazing marketing work tbh

Euronews@euronews.com

Turning mercury into gold? A US start-up says it has just done it

I don't give investing advice but if you want to support fusion you should probably start with the companies that have raised billions of dollars to do boring stuff like make better magnets and/or lasers in service of doing fusion, not the ones promising things far downstream of successful fusion

Katie Mummah reposted

Replying to @nuclearkatie.com

The large scale plants have challenges in terms of up front cost, but I'm not convinced that the small plants will end up significantly cheaper, especially on a per MW and O&M cost. And WEC is a real company that makes real products (sometimes) unlike a lot of the frankly dubious startups

As recently as 2023 there was no UF6 uranium conversion in the US. Now Metropolis Works is 3 years into their restart and expanding, plus a Canadian nuclear startup (from Alberta, interestingly) wants to build a new conversion plant in Wyoming cowboystatedaily.com/2026/10/21/g...

cowboystatedaily.comGillette Targeted For Massive $575 Million Uranium Processing PlantA Canadian uranium processing company is eyeing Gillette for a massive $575 million facility with the goal of helping to transform northeastern Wyoming…

Katie Mummah reposted

Replying to @nuclearkatie.com

I mean, the standard design cert for the AP1000 now has one of the Vogtle units as the reference (with all the construction related mods). So they're starting from a better place. And I assume nobody is going to use WEC as the main AE/contractor again

On one hand it will lose its "hidden gem" status as national parks get much more visibility than monuments, on the other hand it's awesome so more people should go enjoy!

Katie Mummah reposted

I dug into EIA data and found a growing divide between electricity prices at investor-owned utilities and public power providers. Then @michellema.bsky.social and I visited two towns that show what that divide means for customers on the ground. Read our story here! www.bloomberg.com/graphics/202...

bloomberg.comOne Home’s Power Bill Is $500. A Half-Mile Away, It’s 70% LowerThe stark difference reflects a growing national divide between investor-owned utilities and public power providers

Translating politicians statements Expand housing in a "regional approach" = NIMBY, but gosh we need it in someone else's backyard! "Keep commute times reasonable" = hopefully someone nearby is a YIMBY! Preserve "Community character" = things should be preserved in amber

Katie Mummah reposted

Interviewer: Can you explain this gap in your CV? Scientist: I made it in TeX and can't figure out how to remove the gap but I also don't want to get yelled at if I post a question on stackexchange, so I have instead decided to appreciate the gap, which is still there

👁️saac 👁️o@eyesack.bsky.social

Interviewer: Can you explain this gap in your résumé? John Cage:

Katie Mummah reposted

Yes every woman has been harassed, many assaulted. But every woman has also experienced invisible loss from moments she avoided harassment. She felt a space becoming unsafe, so she left, while men stayed on. And in leaving, she lost: opportunities, experiences, learning, promotions, even simply fun.

"Search and rescue teams going on fewer missions in New Mexico despite rising call volumes" Why? Sheriffs & fire depts are trying to tackle missions alone. Even when SAR volunteers, who are unpaid, have different and unique skills, could help. The public loses out. www.ems1.com/search-and-r...

ems1.comN.M. search and rescue teams face fewer missions despite increase in callsVolunteer search and rescue leaders say local agencies are waiting too long to request specialized teams
View full thread

Some fire departments & sheriffs apparently view SAR as a way to get themselves a higher budget for overtime and training. However, they're not actually equipped with the wilderness skills needed for many SAR missions, and then SAR teams are called in much later, sometimes too late. Sometimes never.

If you recreate in the woods you should want all the different agencies in New Mexico from local to state to tribal to be working together when folks are lost or injured in our expansive wildernesses. Sadly, the strength and friendliness of those inter-agency connections vary widely across the state

"Search and rescue teams going on fewer missions in New Mexico despite rising call volumes" Why? Sheriffs & fire depts are trying to tackle missions alone. Even when SAR volunteers, who are unpaid, have different and unique skills, could help. The public loses out. www.ems1.com/search-and-r...

ems1.comN.M. search and rescue teams face fewer missions despite increase in callsVolunteer search and rescue leaders say local agencies are waiting too long to request specialized teams

Bob Rodgers, NM state SAR resource officer/only person in the state who gets paid to manage SAR, says "Fire departments, county sheriffs, feel they can do it without us, and if they get into a problem, they’re waiting two or three hours, if not days, before they finally realize they needed SAR.”

This has been an ongoing problem for so many years that the legislature passed a law in 2025 requiring jurisdictions to notify the state police (which SAR volunteers operate under) when a report could involve “lost, stranded, entrapped or injured persons". But is it working?

If I can't bring my coffee or water bottle to a conference room I do not want to be there, or work with people who have such stupid and unwritten rules. Exceptions of course for labs or nuclear facilities but none of these no-beverage hardliners seem to be talking about those situations

Kai Ryssdal@kairyssdal.bsky.social

I’m sorry, but if you bring an iced coffee - or any damn beverage at all - to a job interview, you’re disqualified. It’s not hard, people.

View full thread

As long as your beverage is not prohibited (e.g. alcohol, CBD drinks, disallowed from the physical location for health and safety reasons) I see no reason why this is something people have strong opinions about??

If I can't bring my coffee or water bottle to a conference room I do not want to be there, or work with people who have such stupid and unwritten rules. Exceptions of course for labs or nuclear facilities but none of these no-beverage hardliners seem to be talking about those situations

Kai Ryssdal@kairyssdal.bsky.social

I’m sorry, but if you bring an iced coffee - or any damn beverage at all - to a job interview, you’re disqualified. It’s not hard, people.

I do not really drink iced coffee. I bring hot coffee in a travel mug from home every day of the year. I have never once thought about someone else's beverage in a meeting let alone during an interview, except when I forget my own water bottle and then it's jealousy

Sometimes Teams just decides to take four+ minutes to load my meeting. Don't rush buddy, this 30 minute meeting has plenty of time

Katie Mummah reposted

Elise Cutts@elisecutts.bsky.social

It's always a great sign when an interview with a scientist starts like this: Me: Hi there, thanks for talking to me. I'd like to ask you some questions about [thing]. Scientist: OH MY GOODNESS I LOVE [thing]!!! I could talk about [thing] for hours!!!!!

I needed to grab a coworkers paper quickly so I searched for it by keywords and Gemini not only hallucinated a first name from "A.", it decided on a common mens name and referred to the researcher as he. Her name is Alex! which is even in one of the documents cited!

I think you shouldn't be able to qualify for a $900 million contract from DOE without publicly announcing the type of technology you're using. Until they do I'm going to spread the rumor that General Matter is going all the way back to outdated gaseous diffusion

Cheryl Rofer@cherylrofer.bsky.social

Did you learn what enrichment method General Matter is using?

One thing that was clear from Global, the nuclear fuel cycle conference, is that venture capital has made its way beyond reactors alone and into the fuel cycle. Laser enrichment is back, baby!