Par / Zip reposted
Par / Zip
Par / Zip
@parailurus.bsky.social
๐ NSFW, no minors โ๏ธ lvl 39 he/him ๐ณ๏ธโ๐ gay/pan ๐ฃ TRANS RIGHTS! BLM! ๐พ Par (wah-cat) โ me! ๐ธ Zip (tabby-๐-cat) โ @gentlefur.bsky.social Icon ๐จ @KiyoneScarlet.bsky.social
1.9K followers1.5K following1K posts
Par / Zip reposted
Par / Zip reposted
Par / Zip reposted
(/hj) if even one elected position turns blue in Texas, it will not be thanks to efforts of milquetoast corporate democrats that can't even be bothered to stand up and defend trans people. Direct all of your thanks to the organizers on the ground and, as the republicans point out, Texas furries:
Par / Zip reposted
Par / Zip reposted
Bling Bang Bang Born! - BLFC 2026 HAPPY / FELIZ #FURSUITFRIDAY #fursuitdance "ManedBento" , @parailurus.bsky.social
Par / Zip reposted
Par / Zip reposted
with love: nothing stops (industry) artists from making their online presence more than the blank canvas of just "digital artist" along with a business/patreon link in a bio and only posting an unannotated portfolio. E.g. a history of anti-generative-AI commentary does wonders against AI accusations
sheeran/macklemore is a fresh example of this. Tying yourself to an industry that requires artists to be "apolitical" to be commercially viable makes you vulnerable to accusations of being complicit with the worst parts of our existence. Putting the vacuous act of "making art" above all is, a choice
Par / Zip reposted
I think I've got a different take here. I disagree that the purpose of art is to make you feel something. It will, ideally, make you feel something, but that because feeling is the natural human reaction to art's actual purpose: to mean something.
LRT the point of "Fountain" (and the other "readymades") was to piss people off art's purpose is to make you feel something. ideally, what the artist wants you to feel "Fountain" is an all timer because it's still pissing people off, over 100 years later
Par / Zip reposted
connecting a line on a corkboard between these stories and the ai agent swarm using the package manager as a bbs, and then annotating it with "the agent swarm's usage was not original or innovative" and "no, you can't use this to measure 'intelligence' and say the swarm was as 'clever' as children"
Kids used to do that in book reviews on Barnes and Noble. Authors were like "why am I getting all these 3 star reviews that say "redtail plz go back"?
Par / Zip reposted
I have mixed feelings on this, but it is the right move for this con. Having sex-positive environments that aren't 18+ is very important. Those are spaces where you get the most from safely teaching about consent and building a culture and community around reducing SA. That takes a lot to maintain..
An important (serious) announcement about the future of Furrydelphia.
I have mixed feelings on this, but it is the right move for this con. Having sex-positive environments that aren't 18+ is very important. Those are spaces where you get the most from safely teaching about consent and building a culture and community around reducing SA. That takes a lot to maintain..
An important (serious) announcement about the future of Furrydelphia.
Security complications, legal hoops to jump through for registration and other legal risks, the logistics around separating out <18 and 18+ areas, properly supporting legal guardians... It all adds up, and there is no con right now that has copious amounts of free staff resources to maintain it all.
Some nuance on 3d-printing-in-the-fandom discourse. disclaimer: I'm a 3d printer enthusiast. I design'n'make custom/bespoke personal projects. tl;dr: 3d printers are being abused to make a quick buck and steal in-fandom vendor space. That's what people are against. Not against 3d printing in general
I'm seeing movement towards people starting to have the same reaction to "I 3d printed this" as "I generated this with AI". But 3d printing is just printing. The question is: what is being printed? Is it slop (note: the quality is irrelevant)? Ask that, and then help keep the slop out of the fandom.
Some nuance on 3d-printing-in-the-fandom discourse. disclaimer: I'm a 3d printer enthusiast. I design'n'make custom/bespoke personal projects. tl;dr: 3d printers are being abused to make a quick buck and steal in-fandom vendor space. That's what people are against. Not against 3d printing in general
tangent re: "but it's not biodegradable". The vinyl stickers you trade at cons are not. Faux fur for fursuits? No. Your personal silicone sculptures. Nah. The polyfill in your plushes is not. Focusing on personal actions to protect the environment should be lower-priority vs corporate accountability
Some nuance on 3d-printing-in-the-fandom discourse. disclaimer: I'm a 3d printer enthusiast. I design'n'make custom/bespoke personal projects. tl;dr: 3d printers are being abused to make a quick buck and steal in-fandom vendor space. That's what people are against. Not against 3d printing in general
3d printers are a tool. No different than laser cutters, cnc machines, or... paper printers. Just like printed wall art, the artistic value is not in the form. But when it is used inappropriately, like mass production of slop to be sold, that's a problem. I'd call that, like, "pseudo drop shipping".
I am ๐ฏ with "fuck 3d printer slop". But not because the slop is 3d printed. The problem is that it is slop. If it was injection-molded slop instead, it would still be bad. If it wasn't slop, it would be fine. E.g. in-fandom-designed-and-produced 3d printed fursuit glasses and head bases are fine.
Par / Zip reposted
Par / Zip reposted
yeah so as I was saying
thought I had: el-Sayed and Mamdani are way better on trans rights than people like Tallarico because Muslim Americans know the score and know there's no compromise with the braying monsters that our electorate is composed of. they know better than anyone that we stand together or hang seperately.
Par / Zip reposted
Par / Zip reposted
Par / Zip reposted