Paul Byrne

Paul Byrne

@theplanetaryguy.com

Associate Professor of Earth, Environmental, and Planetary Science at WashU • NASA Planetary Data System Geosciences Node Director • Explorers Club EC50 • eeps.washu.edu/people/paul-byrne • he/him

19.5K followers261 following3.9K posts

Pinned

Open this photo up and look for the small, white dot just left of centre. It looks like Venus, shining brightly in the twilight sky. But it's us. It's Earth. From Mars.

Fucking Klingons

George Takei@georgetakei.bsky.social

My heart is heavy. Walter Koenig, our Ensign Pavel Chekov, passed away early today. Walter and I met on the bridge of the Enterprise in the 1960s, and we stayed friends for nearly six decades. When Brad and I married in 2008, Walter stood beside us as our best man.

Paul Byrne reposted

A day late, but this is one of the first images taken of Earth from space. Ever. It was acquired from an altitude of 105 km (five times higher than the previous record) eighty years ago, on 24 October 1946, with a 35 mm camera mounted on a V-2 rocket launched from the White Sands Missile Range.

A day late, but this is one of the first images taken of Earth from space. Ever. It was acquired from an altitude of 105 km (five times higher than the previous record) eighty years ago, on 24 October 1946, with a 35 mm camera mounted on a V-2 rocket launched from the White Sands Missile Range.

View full thread

And this is a photo of Earth taken from space by the GOES-19 satellite about... a half hour before I posted this. Credit: NOAA/CIRA/RAMMB SLIDER

And this is an image of Earth from space taken by the Artemis II Crew on the second day of their flight—the first crewed flight to lunar space since 1972. Credit: NASA/Artemis II Crew

A day late, but this is one of the first images taken of Earth from space. Ever. It was acquired from an altitude of 105 km (five times higher than the previous record) eighty years ago, on 24 October 1946, with a 35 mm camera mounted on a V-2 rocket launched from the White Sands Missile Range.

This scene is a composite of two NASA Perseverance rover Left Navigation Camera (Navcam) images, taken Saturday, 24 October 2026 at a local Jezero Crater time of 1:20 pm. Colour and white balance adjusted to better match human vision.

Abraded material and drill tailings indicate where the rover has characterized and retrieved a sample from these rocks. That's not to say that the rover will take that sample onboard for long-term storage. Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech/Paul Byrne

He really is an absolute scumbag. Like, anyone with eyes and a brain and a shred of decency could see this years, decades ago. But it's more overt now. Almost constant. His being elected president once, much less twice, is a fucking stain on our country.

Aaron Rupar@atrupar.com

😳 WOMAN REPORTER: Do sexual abuse allegations mean nothing to you, sir? TRUMP: Wait. Wait! Wait wait wait. Slow down. Who are you with? REPORTER: NBC, sir. But they are very serious sex abuse allegations TRUMP: Quiet! Isn't she a fresh person? You're a horrible little reporter, aren't you?

Paul Byrne reposted

Still covering Elon Musk as a business mogul and not foregrounding his murderous white nationalist politics is like doing a piece on only the clown career of John Wayne Gacy.

View full thread

The Andromeda Galaxy is about 2.5 million lightyears away, and occupies a portion of the sky equivalent in width to six full Moons. Andromeda and the Milky Way may merge in 7–8 billion years. We will probably not be around to see it.

This is a composite of multiple telephoto images taken by Lucy Yunxi Hu in Mullion, New South Wales on the night of October 10th/11th, and shows Andromeda in the southern spring sky. It's the NASA Astronomy Picture of the Day for 23 October 2026. Read more: science.nasa.gov/image-articl...

Paul Byrne reposted

This is stellar nursery N159, a region of star formation in the Large Magellanic Cloud, by JWST. Its colours are seasonally appropriate, as is the fact that with so many stars forming here, and thus so many planets, *one* of them is bound to develop some sort of cosmic horror on it.

These changes are causing quite a bit of stir in the space science community, and many of us have a *lot* of questions. However, the biggest issue with NASA's missions isn't a lack of industry involvement or length of review. It's that NASA lacks the money to fly missions regularly.

SpacePolicyOnline@spacepolicyonline.bsky.social

NASA SMD AA Nicky Fox announces "new Competition Model 2.0" -- a "better way to compete" science missions and "accelerate delivery of science." science.nasa.gov/directorates... Virtual NASA Science Town Hall on Oct 26 to discuss it.

View full thread

As envisioned, New Frontiers was originally supposed to be competed twice a decade, and Discovery was to see a launch every two years. We're now at nine years for NF (with the next competition expected in 2027, 10 years after the last). And at seven for Discovery, and counting.

So it's great to shorten competition timelines, bring more industry in, open the field to more entrants/PIs/science teams. But if there isn't money to run competitions more frequently... what's the point?

These changes are causing quite a bit of stir in the space science community, and many of us have a *lot* of questions. However, the biggest issue with NASA's missions isn't a lack of industry involvement or length of review. It's that NASA lacks the money to fly missions regularly.

SpacePolicyOnline@spacepolicyonline.bsky.social

NASA SMD AA Nicky Fox announces "new Competition Model 2.0" -- a "better way to compete" science missions and "accelerate delivery of science." science.nasa.gov/directorates... Virtual NASA Science Town Hall on Oct 26 to discuss it.

For example, the last time NASA's Planetary Science Division competed their larger mission class, New Frontiers, was 2017. (Dragonfly was the winner, selected in 2019.) The last Discovery competition was in 2019, with selections in 2021. And those missions won't now fly til the next decade.

This is stellar nursery N159, a region of star formation in the Large Magellanic Cloud, by JWST. Its colours are seasonally appropriate, as is the fact that with so many stars forming here, and thus so many planets, *one* of them is bound to develop some sort of cosmic horror on it.

This image spans about 230 lightyears across. N159 (also known as LHA 120-N 159) is around 161,000 lightyears away. There are fewer building blocks for stars and planets here (they are less "metal" rich), and the region is only about 3 million years old. Read more: esawebb.org/images/potm2...

lol this isn't really the head of a giant Celestial silly, do you think we'd admit it if it were?! This is Arp-Madore 2026-42, a relatively rare galactic collision, where two similarly sized galaxies interacted and are in the process of fully merging. Read more: science.nasa.gov/asset/hubble...

Paul Byrne reposted

Take a moment to think about what this image shows. That's a glint of sunlight, reflecting off a lake of liquid ethane and methane, on a moon that's larger than Mercury where the average surface temperature is –180°C, orbiting a giant ringed planet 1.4 billion kilometres away.

Paul Byrne reposted

Use AI if you think you have to, but to push a "paper" onto arXiv and openly admit not understanding the analysis, or even knowing how to approach checking it? Wow.

💀Adina Feinstein PhD 💀@afeinstein20.bsky.social

interestingggg.... paper on the arXiv tonight of a new planet candidate found with and written up entirely by AI, including the caveat, "The author has not independently checked the analyses and does not have the expertise to verify every technical detail." arxiv.org/abs/2610.28575

Take a moment to think about what this image shows. That's a glint of sunlight, reflecting off a lake of liquid ethane and methane, on a moon that's larger than Mercury where the average surface temperature is –180°C, orbiting a giant ringed planet 1.4 billion kilometres away.

Taken by a spacecraft launched in 1997 that flew past Venus on its way to Saturn, which operated until 2017 when it burned up in Saturn's atmosphere. This is NASA Photojournal image PIA12481, taken by Cassini on 8 July 2009 from a distance of 200,000 km from Titan during the spacecraft's 59th flyby.

Paul Byrne reposted

Reminder: The *average* bolide impact velocity at Earth is 20 km/s. That's five seconds from the Kármán line to the ground. There's no slow movement of an asteroid through the sky, giving you enough time to say goodbye to your loved ones. One moment you're alive, the next you're on fire.

Reminder: The *average* bolide impact velocity at Earth is 20 km/s. That's five seconds from the Kármán line to the ground. There's no slow movement of an asteroid through the sky, giving you enough time to say goodbye to your loved ones. One moment you're alive, the next you're on fire.

View full thread

To be clear, I don't spend any time worrying about something smashing into us. (There's lots of other things to be worried about.) I just don't want you to think that we'd have any time to watch the thing enter the atmosphere, because we wouldn't.

Also, the last time I posted a pic of a burning skeleton on Bluesky that came from popular media (Uncle Owen and Aunt Beru) it was hidden as mature content. I wonder how long this post will last.

Reminder: The *average* bolide impact velocity at Earth is 20 km/s. That's five seconds from the Kármán line to the ground. There's no slow movement of an asteroid through the sky, giving you enough time to say goodbye to your loved ones. One moment you're alive, the next you're on fire.

That's the *average* speed. Some impactors will be slower, others faster. Comets are probably going to be faster than asteroids. For a sufficiently high speed, the lithosphere will become molten.

Kīlauea is doing its thing again. Watch live: www.youtube.com/live/gXKuUyK... Also, right now (11:22 am Central) there's a lot of thumping noises as scoria fragments are raining down and smashing into the camera housing. You most definitely would not want to be where that camera is right now.

Paul Byrne reposted

It's possible that, at some point in the past, Venus had oceans. If it did, and if we were somehow able to see it in the night sky, it wouldn't be its familiar cream colour. It would be blue.

It's possible that, at some point in the past, Venus had oceans. If it did, and if we were somehow able to see it in the night sky, it wouldn't be its familiar cream colour. It would be blue.