Mikael Persson

Mikael Persson

@professormpersson.bsky.social

Professor, Political Science, University of Gothenburg

128 followers163 following46 posts

Mikael Persson reposted

Mikael Persson reposted

‼️ New paper out in @polbehavior.bsky.social ! We ask whether the politically active (in terms of electoral or other forms of participation) are better represented? See Jesper's detailed 🧵 below for more info on the paper! 👇

Jesper Lindqvist@jesperlindqvist.bsky.social

🧵I am happy to announce a new article in Political Behavior @polbehavior.bsky.social, “Are the Politically Active Better Represented?”, co-authored with @jenny-oser.bsky.social, @rdassonneville.bsky.social, @professormpersson.bsky.social, and Anders Sundell. link.springer.com/article/10.1...

Mikael Persson reposted

Mikael Persson reposted

Why do some want government spending without supporting the necessary taxation? Such a "something for nothing" mindset is often seen as an information or even sophistication problem. But we find it is equally due to rational interests among the economically vulnerable.

Dr. Silke Goubin@silkegoubin.bsky.social

Starting the new year with a new #openaccess #publication! In our article, we explore why citizens oppose taxes while simultaneously demanding more redistributive social policies, aka want "something for nothing". @olivierjacques.bsky.social @staffankumlin.bsky.social @dweisstanner.bsky.social

Mikael Persson reposted

View full thread
View full thread

Mikael Persson reposted

Had a *fantastic* time at the Nordic Political Behavior Workshop! Great papers, engaging discussions, and super constructive feedback. Thanks so much for organizing @finseraas.bsky.social @lchristensen.bsky.social @professormpersson.bsky.social & Peter Dinesen!

Mikael Persson@professormpersson.bsky.social

The 5th Nordic Political Behavior Workshop in Trondheim! @lchristensen.bsky.social @rdassonneville.bsky.social @finseraas.bsky.social et al!

Mikael Persson reposted

📘 64.4 @jesperlindqvist.bsky.social, @professormpersson.bsky.social, W.Schakel & A.Sundell look at 🗳️ voters’ policy preferences often misalign with what they get in practice with the study showing how this “electoral connection” gap contributes to unequal outcomes #OA 🔗

ejpr.onlinelibrary.wiley.comPoor choices? Examining the electoral connection behind unequal policy representationJESPER LINDQVIST, MIKAEL PERSSON, WOUTER SCHAKEL, ANDERS SUNDELL
View full thread
View full thread

7/ – Inflation strongly affects personal/national evaluations and vote choice – Unemployment matters for all outcomes, but less consistently – GDP influences national more than personal assessments – Stocks influences personal evaluations, but matters less for voting

8/ Not all voters process signals the same way: – High-knowledge voters make more accurate and nuanced inferences – High-income voters place more weight on stock markets – Labor market position has surprisingly little impact

View full thread

5/ Voters have intuitive models of how the economy works. Many apply a “good-begets-good” heuristic: When one signal improves, others are assumed to follow. But this isn’t always consistent with macroeconomic logic. High-knowledge = more likely to recognize tradeoffs.

6/ Voters distinguish who benefits and who suffers from different signals: – Unemployment is seen as hurting the working class – Inflation is seen as hitting both the working and middle class – Stock markets are seen as primarily benefiting the rich – GDP growth broadly positive.

View full thread

2/ Most economic voting research assumes voters respond to “the economy” as a unified construct. But which macro signals shape perceptions of the economy? We show that voters distinguish between macroeconomic signals — and reason about them in distinct ways.

Mikael Persson reposted

När väljare tar ställning till hur regeringar hanterar ekonomin spelar inflationen en stor roll, men även arbetslöshet, tillväxt och börsutveckling påverkar bedömningen. Det visar en ny studie från IFAU, genomförd av forskare vid Göteborgs universitet. www.ifau.se/Press/Meddel...

New in the Research Handbook on Education and Democracy: Which teaching practices actually promote students’ democracy learning? Together with Pontus Wallin and Maria Olson, I screened 7,771 studies and reviewed 29 in a systematic review. Here’s what we found. 🧵

View full thread

-Deliberative and participatory approaches often show positive effects—especially for students from disadvantaged backgrounds. -Several studies point to a compensatory effect of open classroom climates. -Not all students benefit equally. Implementation matters.

New in the Research Handbook on Education and Democracy: Which teaching practices actually promote students’ democracy learning? Together with Pontus Wallin and Maria Olson, I screened 7,771 studies and reviewed 29 in a systematic review. Here’s what we found. 🧵

The reviewed studies cover: – classroom discussions and deliberation – simulations and role-play – student decision-making – civic texts and news media – open classroom climates – teacher engagement – collaboration with civil society

Outcomes examined include: – political knowledge – efficacy and participation – democratic values – civic responsibility Ages range from preschool to upper secondary. Some effects are long-term (e.g. voting), others more immediate.

Mikael Persson reposted

Great to see this finally out! It's an interesting paper because we examine whether unequal representation is caused by how low- and high-income people vote (for example ideological voting). Our findings goes against this idea, meaning that unequal representation must be caused by something else!

Mikael Persson@professormpersson.bsky.social

Just published in EJPR "Poor choices? Examining the electoral connection behind unequal policy representation" with @jesperlindqvist.bsky.social , Anders Sundell and Wouter Schakel. (1) ejpr.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/...