Pierre-Yves Oudeyer

Pierre-Yves Oudeyer

@pyoudeyer.bsky.social

Research director @Inria, Head of @flowersInria lab, prev. @MSFTResearch @SonyCSLParis Artificial intelligence, cognitive sciences, sciences of curiosity, language, self-organization, autotelic agents, education, AI and society http://www.pyoudeyer.com

516 followers456 following71 posts

I'm happy to share a new podcast where I explain how I got to study curiosity, why it's fundamental in child development and how this got applied in self-improving robots/AI! 🙏 Thanks to the amazing Lynn Borton for hosting the podcast ! lynnborton.com/2026/08/27/m...

lynnborton.comMake It Your Own: Autotelic Curiosity, with Pierre-Yves OudeyerResearch Pierre-Yves Oudeyer and his team are studying autotelic curiosity, that marvelous ability to self-generate and self-select our own learning objectives, goals or games. They design robots to l...
View full thread

🎯 Takeaways for educators: → AI literacy must train question-asking & answer evaluation, not just "how AI works" → Training metacognition should be a priority: benefits far beyond AI use → An "effortless" AI interaction should be a red flag, not a comfort signal

View full thread

But not all students were equal: 🧠 Those with stronger metacognitive skills (monitoring & regulating their own learning) judged prompt quality better ⚠️ Paradoxically, self-rated AI-experienced students performed worse: self-taught AI breeds overconfidence, not critical skills

View full thread

2️⃣ They couldn't tell a good AI answer from a poor one. Vague responses were rated "useful" just as often as genuinely informative ones. Prior knowledge didn't help: confident students were just as fooled by fluent-sounding text.

We studied 63 students (aged 14-15) in French schools. Task: read a science inquiry problem, query ChatGPT, evaluate its answers, then explain the concept in your own words. 📊 Average score: 10/20 — despite unlimited AI access and solvable problems (some scored near-perfect).

New blog post: The Phylogenetics of Artifacts — inferring the evolution of cultural objects, artificial life forms, and language models. From cat genetics to ancient myths to LLMs. 🧬 1/n

View full thread

New blog post: The Phylogenetics of Artifacts — inferring the evolution of cultural objects, artificial life forms, and language models. From cat genetics to ancient myths to LLMs. 🧬 1/n

View full thread

The blog walks the full intellectual journey — from cat genetics to Dawkins' memes, from myth phylogenetics to the evolutionary landscape of modern AI. Written to be accessible to anyone curious about evolution, culture, and intelligence. 🌱

New blog post: The Phylogenetics of Artifacts — inferring the evolution of cultural objects, artificial life forms, and language models. From cat genetics to ancient myths to LLMs. 🧬 1/n

View full thread

Why does this matter? 300+ models appear daily on @huggingface . Training transparency is declining. Tools like PhyloLM could matter for AI governance, safety monitoring, and simply mapping the evolutionary landscape of what's out there.

New blog post: The Phylogenetics of Artifacts — inferring the evolution of cultural objects, artificial life forms, and language models. From cat genetics to ancient myths to LLMs. 🧬 1/n

View full thread

A good evolutionary marker needs 3 properties: → compressed & universal representation → moderate rate of change → functional grounding DNA has all three. So do high-level myth features. And so does an LLM's core identity: its probability distribution over text.

Our method PhyloLM (ICLR 2025) treats language models as populations of text. "Genes" = short prompt contexts. "Alleles" = their completions. Apply classic genetic distance measures → build phylogenetic trees. No prior knowledge of training history needed.

New blog post: The Phylogenetics of Artifacts — inferring the evolution of cultural objects, artificial life forms, and language models. From cat genetics to ancient myths to LLMs. 🧬 1/n

View full thread

The myth phylogenies match known human migration patterns — shown beautifully by the outstanding work of Julien d'Huy. Same logic, different substrate: not DNA, but narrative structure as evolutionary marker.

New blog post: The Phylogenetics of Artifacts — inferring the evolution of cultural objects, artificial life forms, and language models. From cat genetics to ancient myths to LLMs. 🧬 1/n

Can you reconstruct the evolutionary tree of cat breeds just by looking at their genes? Yes — biologists do this routinely. Can you do the same with ancient myths, tracing how stories evolved across continents by comparing narrative structure? To a large extent, yes.

Pierre-Yves Oudeyer reposted

Major new system and result from the team: SOAR is an open-source self-improving genAI system pushing the frontier of ARC performances using program synthesis It relies on using LLMs as self-improving smart operators for evolutionary search

Julien Pourcel@jul-p.bsky.social

Introducing SOAR 🚀, a self-improving framework for prog synth that alternates between search and learning (accepted to #ICML!) It brings LLMs from just a few percent on ARC-AGI-1 up to 52% We’re releasing the finetuned LLMs, a dataset of 5M generated programs and the code. 🧵

Humans' ability to invent their own games & goals is at the core of open-ended learning. Understanding and modeling computationally how they do it would be enlightening to understand better human cognition and build open-ended AI Great step in this direction in new paper by Guy Davidson et al.

Pierre-Yves Oudeyer reposted

Here is a cool Flow-Lenia simulation, which is a continuous cellular automaton with two distinct features: 1. Mass conservation - sum of all activations is constant through time 2. Localized update rules - enables simulations with differently behaving matter on the same grid

Pierre-Yves Oudeyer reposted

Very happy that our paper received both the EvoApps best paper and the EvoStar best student paper! Congrats team!! Emergent Kin Selection of Altruistic Feeding via Non-Episodic Neuroevolution arxiv.org/abs/2411.10536

arxiv.orgEmergent kin selection of altruistic feeding via non-episodic neuroevolutionKin selection theory has proven to be a popular and widely accepted account of how altruistic behaviour can evolve under natural selection. Hamilton's rule, first published in 1964, has since been exp...
Clément Moulin-Frier@clemmoulinfrier.bsky.social

Max Taylor-Davies will present our new paper at the Evostar conference on Thursday: Emergent Kin Selection of Altruistic Feeding via Non-Episodic Neuroevolution arxiv.org/abs/2411.10536 A joint work with @hamongautier.bsky.social , Timothé Boulet and myself. A quick summary below:

Pierre-Yves Oudeyer reposted

Check out @nicolasyax.bsky.social thread about our paper (co-supervised by @pyoudeyer.bsky.social) where we show that evolutionary tree reconstruction can be successfully applied to map LLMs to map relations and predict their performance! Currently at @iclr-conf.bsky.social

Nicolas Yax@nicolasyax.bsky.social

🔥Our paper PhyloLM got accepted at ICLR 2025 !🔥 In this work we show how easy it can be to infer relationship between LLMs by constructing trees and to predict their performances and behavior at a very low cost with @stepalminteri.bsky.social and @pyoudeyer.bsky.social ! Here is a brief recap ⬇️

Generative AI is a cultural transmission technology: it plays a growing role in generation, selection and transmission of ideas/opinions in human society 🧠🔄🌐 And yet we understand very little of this dynamics at this point 🤔❓ A step forward is our #ICLR2025 paper !👇

Gaia Molinaro@gaiamolinaro.bsky.social

What's wrong with evaluating #LLMs after a single interaction? Come find out @iclr-conf.bsky.social and learn how cultural attraction theory can help us do better. Poster #288, 10 am.

Imagine you can compute a (very) cheap behavioural signatures for LLMs and from it 1) infer their history (which previous models they derived from) 2) build large maps to navigate spaces of 100s of models 3) predict (coarsely) their performances in benchmarks That's PhyloLM 🚀

Nicolas Yax@nicolasyax.bsky.social

🔥Our paper PhyloLM got accepted at ICLR 2025 !🔥 In this work we show how easy it can be to infer relationship between LLMs by constructing trees and to predict their performances and behavior at a very low cost with @stepalminteri.bsky.social and @pyoudeyer.bsky.social ! Here is a brief recap ⬇️

We are starting a new major research project investigating the joint development of curiosity and metacognition in adolescents, where the Flowers lab will collaborate with @mjgruber.bsky.social 's lab at Univ. Cardiff, and Yana Fandakova at Univ. Trier !!! Open postdocs positions, see below 👇

Matthias Gruber@mjgruber.bsky.social

Interested in curiosity and metacognition in childhood and adolescence? Join us at Cardiff University (UK) for a Postdoc position in an international collaboration with @yanafandakova.bsky.social (Germany) and @pyoudeyer.bsky.social (France). Please repost! #DevPsych #PsychSciSky #neuroskyence

Pierre-Yves Oudeyer reposted

Extreme stances about AI and LLMs in particular (be them deflationary or inflationary) are very likely wrong, valid and certainly not good for an healthy debate. But where do they come from? We (with @giadapistilli.com) argue that common cognitive biases may play a role: osf.io/preprints/ps...

osf.ioOSF
Dirk Wulff@dirkwulff.bsky.social

Do LLMs think? Excited to share our updated preprint critically discussing two "Justaic" stances claiming that LLMs lack cognition because they are "just" next-token predictors or "just" machines. Led by @zakashussain.bsky.social and with @ruimata.bsky.social . osf.io/preprints/os...

Pierre-Yves Oudeyer reposted

Humans excel at estimating their own competence and progress on tasks. But can LLM agents do the same? With 🧭MAGELLAN, our agent predicts its own learning progress across vast goal spaces, even generalizing to new tasks! 📄Paper: arxiv.org/abs/2502.07709

cartathomas.bsky.social@cartathomas.bsky.social

🚀 Introducing 🧭MAGELLAN—our new metacognitive framework for LLM agents! It predicts its own learning progress (LP) in vast natural language goal spaces, enabling efficient exploration of complex domains.🌍✨Learn more: 🔗 arxiv.org/abs/2502.07709 #OpenEndedLearning #LLM #RL

Enabling forms of metacognition in LLMs is a frontiers challenge in #AI We've made progress in this direction with MAGELLAN 🧭: curiosity-driven LLMs learn to predict and generalize their own learning progress in very large spaces of goals 🚀 This is then used for automatic curriculum learning 👇

cartathomas.bsky.social@cartathomas.bsky.social

🚀 Introducing 🧭MAGELLAN—our new metacognitive framework for LLM agents! It predicts its own learning progress (LP) in vast natural language goal spaces, enabling efficient exploration of complex domains.🌍✨Learn more: 🔗 arxiv.org/abs/2502.07709 #OpenEndedLearning #LLM #RL