The Scholarly Kitchen

The Scholarly Kitchen

@scholarlykitchen.bsky.social

What's hot and cooking in Scholarly Communications. Blog from the Society for Scholarly Publishing -- account run by Editor David Crotty

4.1K followers19 following823 posts

The Scholarly Kitchen reposted

The Scholarly Kitchen reposted

As Anthropic goes public, am reminded of the last years of grim AI taking in the context of more than a decade of debate about open content--and crucially, the precarity of mostly non-profit humanities publishing. So impt for scholars to understand the system beyond talking points.

Karin Wulf@kawulf.bsky.social

The LibGen/ Meta story is 2 pieces which rile people differently. Some see pirate sites like LG as theft; some as Robin Hoods. Some of the latter see Meta's use as corporatized theft; some OA maximalists see as fair use. 10 years ago (😳), my take. 1/ scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2015/03/25/g...

The Scholarly Kitchen reposted

This is now the post that holds my record for emails in response -- including multiple requests to meet and present. So, seems like a hot topic! :)

Lisa Janicke Hinchliffe @lisalibrarian.bsky.social

NEW from me today: Every technology might seem to displace the library until you realize that the reality is it just creates new roles for the library. Publishers too. scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/10/27/m...

The Scholarly Kitchen reposted

Model Context Protocol (MCP) is an open-source std for connecting AI applications to external systems. @lisalibrarian.bsky.social proposes libraries treat MCP connectors (+ APIs) as a collection, expect providers to describe them + metadata in machine-readable form. @scholarlykitchen.bsky.social

The Scholarly Kitchen@scholarlykitchen.bsky.social

Who Keeps the Catalog of Connectors? The Coming MCP Discovery Problem scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/10/27/m...

The Scholarly Kitchen reposted

The Scholarly Kitchen reposted

Doit-on demander aux auteurs de publications scientifiques de mettre à jour leur profil dans #OpenAlex ? Et au bénéfice de qui ? L'auteur ou les éditeurs ?

The Scholarly Kitchen reposted

The Scholarly Kitchen reposted

The Scholarly Kitchen reposted

Comments to this are a shitshow. Essentially xkcd.com/927/. Honestly why did ORCID not succeed the way ror.org and to a great extent Crossref did? I'm sure there are many reasons but I do think they made a fundamental strategic error by refusing to own the researcher profile.

xkcd.comStandards

The Scholarly Kitchen reposted

In a new Scholarly Kitchen guest post, CEO Will Schweitzer explores how publishers can separate AI signals from the noise, why shifts in reader behavior deserve attention, and where focused action today can make the biggest difference. Read more: https://bit.ly/4z6Lvil

scholarlykitchen.sspnet.orgGuest Post - All this AI Signal and Noise: What Deserves Action Now - The Scholarly KitchenAmidst the onslaught of industry and global changes, opportunities, and advancements, which signals deserve action now, which are context, and which are weather?

The Scholarly Kitchen reposted

The Scholarly Kitchen reposted

How guarantee research integrity w increasing falsification? How quell populist doubt in expertise? What are business models given no-longer-reliable public funding? How best to deliver content given new consumption platforms and behaviors? @scholarlypub.bsky.social @scholarlykitchen.bsky.social

The Scholarly Kitchen reposted

The Scholarly Kitchen reposted

The Scholarly Kitchen reposted

The Scholarly Kitchen reposted

Remembering the response to my piece on geowalling ... scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2019/11/14/c...

scholarlykitchen.sspnet.orgCan Geowalling Save Open Access? - The Scholarly KitchenGeowalling open content is proposed yet again. As a thought experiment, @lisalibrarian explores what Plan S principles would be compromised by this tactic.
Richard Sever@richardsever.bsky.social

Entirely unrestricted licenses, for example, not only limit possible sustainability models but enable reuse/resale in ways that may harm authors and the ecosystem itself. AI has exposed this, and even Creative Commons are concerned. (a complex issue and not clear any license can solve this). 2/n

The Scholarly Kitchen reposted

"...a standard follows a recurring cycle: publication enables implementation; implementation exposes gaps; collaboration addresses them; and those discoveries shape the next standard." That is so true, thanks to Julie Zhu for putting it so well!

The Scholarly Kitchen reposted

The Scholarly Kitchen reposted

How will we know whether AI has made scholarly publishing better? Without agreed-upon measures and a willingness to share disappointing or inconclusive results, adoption will keep outrunning the evidence. @sarahhands.bsky.social @paeditorial.bsky.social @scholarlykitchen.bsky.social

The Scholarly Kitchen reposted

"Slowing down doesn’t mean resisting innovation. It means giving ourselves enough space to evaluate tools properly, measure outcomes, and monitor unintended consequences."--Sarah Hands Plus an apt Jurassic Park quote later in the piece!

The Scholarly Kitchen reposted

The Scholarly Kitchen reposted

The Scholarly Kitchen reposted

The Preamble to the Constitution, Trump 2026 edition

#DefendResearch@defendresearch.bsky.social

See for yourself how U.S. government #censorship works with Word Wipe, our new project in partnership with @penamerica.bsky.social. scholarlykitchen.sspnet.org/2026/10/09/d...