The Statutes Project

The Statutes Project

@statutes.bsky.social

Opening up Historic British Law and Legislation and digitally deforming it

562 followers285 following149 posts

Interesting findings from a day of hacking on legal search:

What can collaborative “hacking” teach us about making legal & heritage collections more accessible? Our brilliant PhD student @caitlinwilson.bsky.social & her supervisor @barbaramcgilli.bsky.social brought diverse users together to explore exactly that. Read about it 👇 kingsdh.net/2026/10/06/r...

There's an urban (rural?) myth that James I passed a law requiring the planting of Mulberry trees. He did promote them, but there was no statutory requirement. Rabbit hole here: shkspr.mobi/blog/2017/01... #History

How-to History@howtohistory.bsky.social

Mulberries, by Joe Saunders. Perhaps the most notable chapter in the history of the British mulberry relates to King James VI & I who sought to establish a home-grown silk industry to rival that of Italy and France. how-to-history.com/2026/09/30/m...

The Statutes Project reposted

Thank you @statutes.bsky.social for enabling me to find the 1925 Statutory Rules and Orders on Lunacy buried deep within a Google Books pdf. I salute you!🫡🙏🖖https://statutes.org.uk/site/collections/british-and-irish/statutory-rules-orders-instruments/

statutes.org.ukStatutory Rules, Orders, InstrumentsStatutory Instruments (known, prior to 1948, as Statutory Rules or Orders) are delegated legislation, powers allowed to the executive by the actual statutes. For a concise introduction, see Wikiped…

The Statutes Project reposted

The text of this equivocal act: statutes.org.uk/site/the-sta... #LegalHistory #EnslavedHistory

History of Parliament@histparl.bsky.social

On this day in 1833, the Slavery Abolition Act received royal assent, abolishing slavery in the British Empire. Our colleague @joempbaker.bsky.social looked into the specifics of the act, and why it was necessary 26 years after the passing of the 1807 Slave Trade Act.

The Statutes Project reposted

You can now quickly identify single female plaintiffs in Court of Requests cases by searching REQ 2 for the code "SFP". Over 2,500 hits. discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/results/r?_s...

discovery.nationalarchives.gov.ukdiscovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Daniel F Gosling@thegozfather.bsky.social

Some very REQciting news. My Court of Requests pleadings (REQ 2/16-424) project is now complete. Over 28,000 items dating from c.1547-c.1625 (Edw VI to Jas I) now searchable online. Happy researching everyone 🙂 discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/browse/r/h/C...

Text of the act here: www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1963/4... #LegalHistory

legislation.gov.ukLegislation.gov.ukThe official home of UK legislation, revised and as enacted 1267-present. This website is managed by The National Archives on behalf of HM Government. Publishing all UK legislation is a core part of t...
History of Parliament@histparl.bsky.social

Today in 1963, the Peerage Act was given royal assent. This allowed those who inherited a peerage who had entered the House of Lords the option of disclaiming their title. Alfie Steer explores Tony Benn's role in the passage of this Act, enabling him to be reelected to the House of Commons.

The Statutes Project reposted

I had a blast at this year's British Legal History Conference at the University of Nottingham, where I was talking about my early findings from surveying the whole of the Star Chamber estreats of fines in TNA E 159. [1/3]

Good riddance to this awful law: statutes.org.uk/site/the-sta... #LegalHistory

Josiah Mortimer@josiahmortimer.bsky.social

"The government will repeal the Vagrancy Act on Monday 29 June 2026, ending nearly two centuries of legislation that has criminalised rough sleeping and begging" www.gov.uk/government/n...

The Statutes Project reposted

I found a quite interesting book today. It's well indexed too, for example in case you were wondering if you were obliged to let a tiger stay in your establishment? I can see how that would be a gray area, but seemingly no...

The Statutes Project reposted

On #LovingDay, explore the legal records behind Loving v. Virginia (1967), the Supreme Court case that struck down laws banning interracial marriage. The Internet Archive has digitized and made available the briefs, lower-court opinions, and related documents. archive.org/details/micr...

archive.orgLoving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1 (1967) (No. 395) : Supreme Court of the United States : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet ArchiveCase name: Loving v. VirginiaOpinion filed: 1967-06-12Docket No.: 395Citations:• 18 L. Ed. 2d 1010• 87 S. Ct. 1817• 388 U.S. 1• 1967 U.S. LEXIS...

The Statutes Project reposted

For anyone who published a book, article, or digital project on legal history between Jan.2025 and Dec.2026: you should apply to be featured in the ASLH's virtual event series for next yr--"Making Connections: New Works in Legal History, 2026-27." Due June 30, 2026: aslh.net/virtual-book... (1/2)

aslh.netMaking Connections: New Works in Legal History, 2026-27 | American Society for Legal HistoryMaking Connections: New Works in Legal History Series Sponsored by the American Society for Legal History Deadline for Applications: June 30, 2026 The ASLH Making Connections: New Works in Legal Histo...

Not before time: France overturns law classing people as property – 178 years after it abolished slavery National assembly votes to repeal Code Noir under which enslaved people were beaten, raped and killed www.theguardian.com/world/2026/m... #LegalHistory #EnslavedHistory

theguardian.comFrance overturns law classing people as property – 178 years after it abolished slaveryNational assembly votes to repeal Code Noir under which enslaved people were beaten, raped and killed

Precisely why I started the Statutes Project: to make legislation discoverable, useable and citable. Whilst there's some very bad citation practices by historians, it is also needlessly difficult, and the infrastructure is lacking.

This post is unavailable.

The Statutes Project reposted

🚨 NEW TOOL for U.S. legal journalists ⚖️ I turned @allyjar.bsky.social's incredible crowdsourced Google doc on accessing state court records into an interactive map. Check it out and let me know about any errors, missing information, or ways I can improve this thing (link below)

The Statutes Project reposted

At the Restoration in 1660, it was agreed that Charles II's reign began immediately following the death of Charles I a decade earlier, essentially ignoring the Interregnum. Some documents were even retroactively given a regnal year, like this 1649 Commonwealth record dated 1 Car. 2 [E 133/145/72]

The Statutes Project reposted

🚨Tomorrow, @JudiciaryGOP & @HouseJudiciary hold a hearing on the PRO CODES Act. As SCOTUS has already ruled: “No one can own the law.” This bill threatens that precedent by extending copyright to public laws and standards, restricting your right to access the rules we live by. ⚖️🏛️

The Statutes Project reposted

Race, Law and Empire, 1750-1850 Conference University of Southampton AND online 17th - 18th July 2026 Call for Papers extended by popular request. Full details below. Please share widely. Established, emerging researchers are very welcome. Supported by @leverhulme.ac.uk

The Statutes Project reposted

Story time. Back in 2009, when I started CourtListener, I had the goal of collecting all the case law. I was young, naive, and I worked really hard at it. I gathered data from places like Public.Resource.org, and scraped what I could from other sources. 1/4

Big news today: Free Law Project is now scanning thousands of books to ensure that CourtListener's collection of case law is complete and comprehensive. free.law/2026/04/16/s...

A fine instance of how problematic regnal calendars are.

Daniel F Gosling@thegozfather.bsky.social

In 1660, judges couldn't agree on which regnal year to use in the indictment against the regicides, as the crime of killing Charles I occurred on the last regnal day of Charles I's reign but also the first of Charles II's. So they just went with "30 Jan 1649" [from Sir John Kelyng's Reports]

The Statutes Project reposted

In 1660, judges couldn't agree on which regnal year to use in the indictment against the regicides, as the crime of killing Charles I occurred on the last regnal day of Charles I's reign but also the first of Charles II's. So they just went with "30 Jan 1649" [from Sir John Kelyng's Reports]

The Statutes Project reposted

Any #EarlyModern folks out there who could recommend printed legal materials from England in the early 1630s, especially linked to forest law? I have a student who wants to work on this area for an undergraduate dissertation, & the go-to series I know for medieval legal sources aren't helping much.

The Statutes Project reposted

I completely forgot I made this... a big list of English judicial records, 1500 to 1800, published and often online!