Steve Haroz

Steve Haroz

@steveharoz.com

Visual perception and cognition scientist (he/him) My site: http://steveharoz.com R guide: https://r-guide.steveharoz.com StatCheck Simple: http://statcheck.steveharoz.com

6.4K followers482 following7.3K posts

Pinned

BLOG POST: Invalid Conclusions Built on Statistical errors If you see a small p-value or a large separation in confidence intervals, you may assume that an effect is reliable. But overly simple reporting may be hiding serious conclusion-altering errors. Here are some example scenarios: 1/🧵 #stats

steveharoz.comInvalid Conclusions Built on Statistical ErrorsWhen you see the statistical result of an experiment like p = 0.003 or a 95% confidence interval of , you might assume a certain clarity and definitiveness in those results. A null effect is very unli...

Watching the first episode of Foundation. A character claims he can predict when large empires will fall but can only explain it to a "mathematician conversant in ordinal analysis". Is this how physicists feel when they watch The Core?

They describe a sample size of "trillions of people", but it's one empire. Their sample size for modelling empire collapse is one incomplete sample.

Steve Haroz reposted

Your monthly reminder that if you're using ChatGPT to do your science, you're failing your colleagues, community, and all of us. Here, ChatGPT makes up data and presents it as the real thing — then apologizes when confronted.

Genuinely, is this it for science communication? Just hopelessly fighting off a torrent of stupid bullshit spewed out by genAI that people mindlessly repeat?

Steve Haroz reposted

Replying to @devezer.bsky.social

The purpose of peer review is not primarily to help authors improve their papers.

Claim: AI reviewers are better than "expert" human reviewers Methods concern: Acceptance by a journal doesn't appear to be a grouping variable in this study. If the papers were mostly accepted, wouldn't the blind optimism of LLMs bias them as more accurate/helpful?

Steve Haroz reposted

Provocative new preprint examines 14 published meta-analyses claiming AI improves student learning and concludes... Not a single one provides a valid basis for its claims, citing widespread methodological flaws. osf.io/preprints/ed... Watch a webinar from yesterday about the findings:

youtube.comPresumed Effective: The Manufacturing of an Evidence Base for AI-in-Ed Through Flawed Meta-AnalysisYouTube video by MIT Teaching Systems Lab

I really need ton convert my (php-based) wordpress blog to something static. Sigh... yet another project added to the todo list.

Steve Haroz reposted

What’s the relationship between different aspects of visual time perception? To address this question, I propose a classification in four clusters of twelve classic visual time phenomena. Comments/criticisms welcome, including by email. osf.io/preprints/ps...

osf.ioTowards a taxonomy for visual time perceptionThe investigation of visual time perception has uncovered a large variety of phenomena, but how these phenomena are related to each other is unclear. The ambition of the present review is to propose a...

Steve Haroz reposted

We analysed over a thousand academic job ads in Norway from 2023 and 2025. Very few mentioned open science practices as desired or required skills, and this didn't change over time. However, we *did* find that open science was mentioned more often in ads for tenured positions than early career ones

Dan Quintana@dsquintana.bsky.social

New preprint! Universities increasingly expect academics to practise open science. But is it rewarded when hiring? We analysed 1,356 academic job ads from Norwegian institutions and found that <5% of ads mentioned open science as a required or desired qualification osf.io/preprints/ps...

Steve Haroz reposted

We were investigating Wedgewood for faking their data and emailed them for comment this morning, ahead of publishing the findings tomorrow. They are now trying to cover up their fraud with the "we were doing a social experiment" excuse. Full story here: blog.fiftyplusone.news/p/fiftypluso...

blog.fiftyplusone.newsFiftyPlusOne just caught a pollster faking data — and they copped to itIn response to a request for comment on a FiftyPlusOne investigation, Wedgewood Polls admitted their data was bogus

Double and triple negatives should be forbidden on voter initiatives. "Are you in favor or against reversing the repeal of the removal of the tax?"

Steve Haroz reposted

Replying to @clauswilke.com

Yeah, my point was that if you're going to guess what seed a random number generator used, 42 is a pretty good starting point. My point was more to dismiss the idea that the sleuth needed insider knowledge to figure a very commonly used seed.

Apparently, a VPN server in the Seychelles tried to log into my home server last night. They didn't get in. But I'm amused at the idea of trying to explain a VPN server in the middle of the Indian Ocean as having any legal utility.

Most dashboards are an infodump of statistically meaningless numbers. If people want to automate making them with genAI, then good riddance.

Steve Haroz reposted

Are the original Johnson et al. 1991 findings evidence of a face-template or something more general, and is this bias to orient towards stimuli like them reflective of an domain-specific mechanism? This excellent paper challenges the face-template interpretation as well as the domain-specific one.

Dr Nick@nmwilkinson.eurosky.social

New paper! Accepted at Perspectives on Psychological Science. A textbook finding in infant psychology is that newborns - within ~1 hour of birth - visually track a simplified 'three blob' facelike stimulus further than its inverted control (see picture). This suggested inborn knowledge of faces!

Steve Haroz reposted

Currently, a diagram is making the rounds that is claimed to show a significant reduction in Russian disinformation bot activity after Ukrainian drones hit Yandex data centers. There is no evidence that this plot shows real data. I suspect that this image is AI-generated.

This article in Science claims to have preregistered its study, but I cannot find any link to a preregistration either in the article or in the supplemental material. There isn't even mention of what platform was used in to preregister. WTF? www.science.org/doi/full/10....

The reason it caught my eye is that the effects are small, noisy, and only appear in some groups. Also, a lot of one-way tests are employed (which is not well justified IMHO).

Color constancy: the circled areas have the same color even if your visual system insists otherwise.

erin-goddard.bsky.social@erin-goddard.bsky.social

This work just published! jov.arvojournals.org/article.aspx... To celebrate, a new Australian-rainbow-lorikeet-themed demonstration of colour constancy.

I don't understand how research papers so frequently misreport the sample size. It's literally the easiest number to get right. And every number after it is called into question if it isn't accurate. Anyway, here's an overview of how I start a review: steveharoz.com/blog/2022/re...

steveharoz.comReviewing Tip: The 10-Minute Data CheckSolving a Rubik\'s Cube takes skill and time. But checking if at least one face is solved correctly is quick and simple. Science should work the same way. While it\'d be ideal to be able to perform a ...

Steve Haroz reposted

A really interesting person with an underappreciated impact

bryan newbold@bnewbold.net

ah damn, RIP Margaret Hamilton. she took safety-critical software engineering seriously, and got people to the moon and back. news.mit.edu/2026/margare...

Behavioral, cognitive, and social science research has had devastating cuts in the US in the last couple years.

Dan Garisto@dangaristo.bsky.social

In addition to spending less money and making fewer new grants, SBE also dramatically narrowed where it made those new grants. Areas such as economics, sociology, and archaeology received few to no grants.

Steve Haroz reposted

Replying to @achetverikov.bsky.social

Here's the figure from the supplement with different tasks used for "cross-validation" of the bot. You can see that it often under- or overestimates humans. So sometimes it can be filtered out as a very poor subject, but would you automatically discard a very good one? 4/n

Search engines be like: I'm gonna ignore that first word that you put in quotes and added a + in front of and just return every result that has the second word.

Steve Haroz reposted

Replying to @kjhealy.co

Here’s the monthly data with a 12-month trailing average, so we don’t “look ahead” of the time series. We can see that visits from Canada are substantially down. Like, a *lot*. And if we looked at the French series by itself we’d see something too. But it’s not on the scale of Covid. Yet.

Steve Haroz reposted

#TodayinHistory #dataviz #OTD 📊 🎂Sep 29, 1829 Michael George Mulhall born in Dublin, Ireland 🇮🇪 1884: 🥇1st? use of a pictogram, to represent data by icons proportional to a number The train one is accurate; the wheel one commits the area illusion, using diameter to represent the number

So the whole giant story about 5 men being stopped from performing a major terrorist attack on a UK air force base involved in the US war on Iran ... is looking like just some local guys stealing petrol from nearby farm equipment. 🤡

Steve Haroz reposted

If I search for tropical cyclones that actually came within 100 miles of New Mexico, I found 16 of them going back to 1916. The most recent was Newton in 2016. This isn't just remnants bringing rain, these are actual data points as tropical cyclones.

Steve Haroz reposted

🚨New paper alert! 🚨 The visual system tunes itself to the statistics of its input. How do individual experiences differently tune vision? In this work, @bjbalas.bsky.social and I examined how one individual difference—height—changes the visual diet and how this affects perception. 1/

Steve Haroz reposted

💯

Chris Mihos@chrismihos.bsky.social

I get really annoyed seeing so many people say "Since everyone uses AI to write papers..." or "Referee reports now are just written by AI..." Look: Everything I have written has, for better or worse, been my own writing. Don't project your cynical expectations on my work. Seriously, screw gen-AI.

Steve Haroz reposted

New preprint! 🎉 I analysed 1660 papers from 4 psychology journals and found materials sharing went from 9% of papers in 2015 to 82% in 2025, and these materials *do* get downloaded — a median of 135 times each. BUT shared code is often hard to run. doi.org/10.31234/osf... Let's walk through it 🧵

Many people are disappointed with the current state of technology, but the "popcorn" button on modern microwaves does actually work now.