The Tax Law Center at NYU Law

The Tax Law Center at NYU Law

@taxlawcenter.org

Protecting and strengthening the tax system through rigorous legal work in the public interest. Based at NYU Law. https://taxlawcenter.org/

462 followers25 following232 posts

The proposed citizenship question would impede tax administration by chilling voluntary compliance. It marks a sharp reversal of IRS policy: the IRS has long recognized that asking about citizenship would be counter to its revenue collection and tax administration goals.

It is therefore possible that the tax system will fail to collect potentially billions of taxes properly owed on sports event contracts, and in doing so provide an incentive for activity to flow from traditional sportsbooks to prediction markets.

As policymakers raise concerns about the social and health impacts of both gambling and prediction markets and consider tools including raising excise taxes, they should consider whether prediction markets provide a ready way to avoid federal excise and income taxes.

Based on our understanding of the facts and analysis of current law, we conclude that the best reading of the tax code is that sports event contracts appear, like conventional sports bets, to be "wagers” and “wagering" and subject to gambling excise and income tax rules.

There is currently no explicit public guidance or case law that specifically addresses the federal tax treatment of a sports event contract on a prediction market, and there is little clarity on what tax positions market participants are taking.

The Tax Law Center at NYU Law reposted

In conjunction, the Tax Law Center and the Hamilton Project will release a policy proposal explaining how formal cost-benefit analysis does not provide meaningful insights when applied to rules implementing tax laws and other transfer programs like Social Security and Medicare.

Treasury and the IRS are attempting to override the clear rules Congress has set for tax credit eligibility and decades of administrative practice. Our comment explains why Treasury and the IRS’s analysis is deeply flawed and why finalizing the proposed rules would be unlawful.

On Thursday 10/8, our Faculty Director Lily Batchelder will speak at an event hosted by @americanprogress.bsky.social focused on business ownership and wealth in America, and the implications for tax policy. Register to attend in person or online: www.americanprogress.org/events/beyon...

americanprogress.orgBeyond Billionaires: Small Business, Taxes, and Who’s Rich in AmericaJoin the Center for American Progress for a conversation on business ownership as the main path to wealth in America, and what that means for the future of tax policy and the American Dream.
Center for American Progress@americanprogress.bsky.social

Don't miss this event on October 8th featuring the authors of "The Everywhere Millionaire," policy practitioners, and advocates! RSVP: www.americanprogress.org/events/beyon...

Treasury and IRS recently released guidance addressing the tax treatment of certain aggressive multi-step ETF transactions and indicating that they are focused on releasing additional guidance on several strategies. This is a positive development.

Treasury and the IRS should continue to pursue guidance addressing tax-motivated products that overstep the bounds of the law. But legislative action will also be required to most effectively preserve revenue and the integrity of the tax system.

Today, the House Ways & Means Committee is marking up a bill focused on taxing digital assets like cryptocurrency. Policymakers should focus on three important principles when considering this bill: parity with similar assets, administrability, and guardrails to prevent abuse.

"The Administration is attempting to override both the clear rules Congress has set for tax credit eligibility and decades of administrative practice through a novel and incorrect reinterpretation of a 1996 law."

We have updated our "Tealbook," a compendium of over 70 policy options to broaden and strengthen the tax base. Updates include revised and new entries to account for OBBBA and other significant gaps in the tax system. Read more: taxlawcenter.org/blog/updated...

taxlawcenter.orgUpdated Resource: Policy options to broaden the tax baseWe have updated our “Tealbook,” a compendium of over 70 policy options to broaden and strengthen the tax base.

Director of Litigation Kelsey Merrick explains the background on the Trump v. IRS lawsuit that led to the settlement agreement and audit release. Listen to our full conversation with @lawfaremedia.org: www.lawfaremedia.org/article/lawf...

lawfaremedia.orgLawfare Daily: Attorney General Blanche’s Purported Waiver of Pres. Trump’s Past Tax LiabilitiesWhat steps could Congress take to investigate how the waiver came about?
Lawfare@lawfaremedia.org

The DOJ settled Trump's $10B IRS lawsuit, and acting AG Todd Blanche claimed to waive his past tax liabilities as a part of that settlement. 🎙️ @rparloff.bsky.social talked to @taxlawcenter.org's Brandon DeBot and Kelsey Merrick about the legality of the settlement. youtu.be/R3vAejMjTio?...

We joined @lawfaremedia.org to discuss the audit release, potential violations of the tax system's protections against political interference, and what Congress can do. Watch the full episode: www.youtube.com/watch?v=R3vA...

Lawfare@lawfaremedia.org

On Lawfare Daily, @rparloff.bsky.social spoke to Brandon DeBot and Kelsey Merrick of @taxlawcenter.org about Attorney General Todd Blanche’s purported waiver of President Trump’s past tax liabilities on May 19, as part of a settlement of Trump’s $10 billion suit against the IRS. youtu.be/R3vAejMjTio

Explainer on Trump-IRS settlement | improper use of the Judgment Fund, laws against political interference in tax investigation, DOJ’s lack of authority to unilaterally drop tax audits, & why the $1.8 billion fund should be taxable to Trump plaintiffs taxlawcenter.org/blog/our-res...

taxlawcenter.orgOur resources on the Trump-IRS lawsuit and settlement agreementThe Department of Justice announced on May 18 a settlement in Trump v. IRS and the creation of a $1.8 billion “compensation” fund. On May 19, the DOJ released an addendum which purports to drop claims...

In response to news that the Acting Attorney General signed an apparent addendum to the Trump v. IRS settlement with a sweeping general waiver of claims—including claims related to the President’s tax returns—Tax Law Center Policy Director Brandon DeBot released the following statement:

View full thread

The settlement and general release of claims is a breathtaking abuse of the tax and legal system, at the same time courts are finding this administration is violating the taxpayer privacy laws the president is now invoking to seek extraordinary benefits for his own purposes."

taxlawcenter.orgStatement on Trump Lawsuit & DOJ Settlement AddendumIn response to news that the Acting Attorney General signed an apparent addendum to the Trump v. IRS settlement with a sweeping general waiver of claims—including claims related to the President’s tax...

In response to news that the Acting Attorney General signed an apparent addendum to the Trump v. IRS settlement with a sweeping general waiver of claims—including claims related to the President’s tax returns—Tax Law Center Policy Director Brandon DeBot released the following statement:

"The new release heightens concerns about potential criminal violations of the tax code’s protections against political interference given White House officials’ reported involvement in the settlement negotiations—which demand thorough investigation.