Pinned
Toneloaf
I posted about this a couple days ago as well because big accounts were starting to spread the idea that it was censorship for a film distributor to pull a movie that was actively hurting the theaters that it depends on to show it's films. Too many post without having knowledge on the subject.
The studio removed it from theaters because the theaters that choose to pick it up were bleeding money. Changing the theatrical window like this is something you never see. There was no conspiracy: none of us paid to see this movie and theaters owners/staff should not suffer the consequences.
Yes, You Can Still See Alex Gibney's ‘Musk’ — Here’s What’s Happening With the Film’s Release Plan "Originally scheduled for a Nov. 24 debut on paid platforms, Alex Gibney’s documentary about Elon Musk will now come to paid VOD on Nov. 6." $TSLA $SPCX www.hollywoodreporter.com/movies/movie...
All the AI and they still have someone swinging a medieval longsword. Bronze age swords, even the long ones, were wielded 1 handed with significantly shorter grip. And the overhead chop is simple not how you'd use a sword in this era.
It's funny how the Defenders of Western Civilization really want Odysseus to be this heroic patriarchal figure when he is canonically kind of a dirtbag.
I posted about this a couple days ago as well because big accounts were starting to spread the idea that it was censorship for a film distributor to pull a movie that was actively hurting the theaters that it depends on to show it's films. Too many post without having knowledge on the subject.
Bleecker Street was sold to Outerlight Entertainment, which is largely owned by long time Democratic donorr Pierre Omidyar. Musk did poorly it's in initial 4 screen limited release, and then was a financial disaster for any theater carried it in it's 2nd weekend.
Controversial “Musk” @alexgibneyfilm.bsky.social Documentary Pulled From Almost Every One of 472 Theaters After One Week by Newly Sold Bleecker Street Films www.showbiz411.com/2026/10/23/c...
It doesn't even take a deep understanding of movie theater box office data to see, if you look, that Musk was a financial disaster. Not compared to big releases, not compared to fiction. Compared to documentaries.
Any @alexgibneyfilm.bsky.social film is very well worth seeing in my experience - and this one especially so - it’s on in NYC at the Angelika and other indie cinemas …not yet shut down by the tech industrial censorship complex (or whatever they call themselves)
Musk was dropped by these theaters because it was a complete box office flop. Theaters made $666 on average over last weekend, barely being Practical Magic 2 in its 6th week. For comparison, You Can See Everything and Street fighter made $18,247/$8,608. People didn't show up, these theaters lost $
Controversial “Musk” @alexgibneyfilm.bsky.social Documentary Pulled From Almost Every One of 472 Theaters After One Week by Newly Sold Bleecker Street Films www.showbiz411.com/2026/10/23/c...
And like it or not, this exactly what the new wave of progressives who claim to be campaigning differently are doing as well, even when they claim they aren't.
We found that as of right now 73% of your campaign donation goes back to the consultants and vendors (!!!), four times more than just 20 years ago. Only 13% to ads. Even I was shocked.
BoxOfficePro is projecting YCSE to match or increase it's opening weekend in weekend 2: $15M-$20M. I think that is soft and it will easily pass $20M. Standing behind the $100M prediction
Weekend projection for You Can See Everything & it is the 2nd hightest opening weekend for a documentary. At $15 million & a per-theater average of $17,544, a massive box office success. Expect incredible legs on this thing. My take: I project over $100 million & passing Fahrenheit 9/11
I find the "regardless of intent" part perhaps the most frustrating. 1. It implies Trump's intent was something other than using an anti-semitic slur to describe someone being incredibly greedy 2. Who gives a shit what the intent is when someone is saying a slur into a microphone
If Zohran Mamdani or Abdul El-Sayed had used the word “Shylock” as an insult, the ADL would be attacking them by name relentlessly. But Donald Trump used it, so we get a generic condemnation of the word without any specific reference to who actually used it, and with no assumption of intent.
You Can See Everything showtimes across Chicago are basically all sold out in the evenings throughout the week. Doubling down on my $100+ million projection
Weekend projection for You Can See Everything & it is the 2nd hightest opening weekend for a documentary. At $15 million & a per-theater average of $17,544, a massive box office success. Expect incredible legs on this thing. My take: I project over $100 million & passing Fahrenheit 9/11
VC investment success rate is about 1/10 and they need most of the other 9 to fail upwards to sell off the investment. You don't have that failure rate and earnestly believe in the companies.
one of the things about VCs is that they actually sort of mostly know you're full of shit, they're testing to see if YOU know you're full of shit. Like they want to know if you are committed enough to the bullshit you're offering that you will absolutely kill yourself to try to make it happen
Box office geek/Theater insider: it is having an incredible run this weekend with little precedent. Large, limited release. 855 theaters; wide releases typically 2500-4000. It is grossing ~double per screen as Street Fighter, which is doing pretty well. This is insane for a 3 hour documentary.
I can’t tell if You Can See Everything is a huge breakaway hit or if it’s specifically managed to dominate the niche demographic: everyone I’ve ever met.
Ultimate, the main point is this: Go see You Can See Everything as soon as you can because it is going to be one of the most best films of the year, if not of all time. Don't believe me? Ask anyone who has seen it.
Box office geek/Theater insider: it is having an incredible run this weekend with little precedent. Large, limited release. 855 theaters; wide releases typically 2500-4000. It is grossing ~double per screen as Street Fighter, which is doing pretty well. This is insane for a 3 hour documentary.
Weekend projection for You Can See Everything & it is the 2nd hightest opening weekend for a documentary. At $15 million & a per-theater average of $17,544, a massive box office success. Expect incredible legs on this thing. My take: I project over $100 million & passing Fahrenheit 9/11
Box office geek/Theater insider: it is having an incredible run this weekend with little precedent. Large, limited release. 855 theaters; wide releases typically 2500-4000. It is grossing ~double per screen as Street Fighter, which is doing pretty well. This is insane for a 3 hour documentary.
Michael De Luca is the executive that greenlit Digger, Sinners, OBAO, & Weapons. He has already been pushed out because of the merger. So the new Paramount/WB was never going to continue in the footsteps of Digger no matter how it did.
Amid Digger‘s box office bomb, Ben Affleck is warning that those who are celebrating the film’s poor performance could instead lead to “a bunch of shitty homogenized movies.”
This is the first Sunday showing at 3 different Chicago chain theaters for You Can See Everything: 12pm, 10:45am, 10:30am. You probably won't be surprised to hear this is never the busiest time on Sundays. I could add even more locations, they all look the same. See this movie, you won't regret it
Box office geek/Theater insider: it is having an incredible run this weekend with little precedent. Large, limited release. 855 theaters; wide releases typically 2500-4000. It is grossing ~double per screen as Street Fighter, which is doing pretty well. This is insane for a 3 hour documentary.
Box office geek/Theater insider: it is having an incredible run this weekend with little precedent. Large, limited release. 855 theaters; wide releases typically 2500-4000. It is grossing ~double per screen as Street Fighter, which is doing pretty well. This is insane for a 3 hour documentary.
I can’t tell if You Can See Everything is a huge breakaway hit or if it’s specifically managed to dominate the niche demographic: everyone I’ve ever met.
Another difference, which should have a big impact on the weeks ahead, is the reception this movie is getting. Letterboxd: 4.8 Rotten Tomatoes: 99% Compared to Fahrenheit 9/11's 3.6/82%
The only movie that fits with You Can See Everything's box is the highest grossing documentary of all time: Fahrenheit 9/11. The reason I still think You Can See Everything is unprecedented is it is 1 hour longer. It cannot be stressed enough how hard it is to get people to a 3 hour documentary
Box office geek/Theater insider: it is having an incredible run this weekend with little precedent. Large, limited release. 855 theaters; wide releases typically 2500-4000. It is grossing ~double per screen as Street Fighter, which is doing pretty well. This is insane for a 3 hour documentary.
I can’t tell if You Can See Everything is a huge breakaway hit or if it’s specifically managed to dominate the niche demographic: everyone I’ve ever met.
Box office geek/Theater insider: it is having an incredible run this weekend with little precedent. Large, limited release. 855 theaters; wide releases typically 2500-4000. It is grossing ~double per screen as Street Fighter, which is doing pretty well. This is insane for a 3 hour documentary.
I can’t tell if You Can See Everything is a huge breakaway hit or if it’s specifically managed to dominate the niche demographic: everyone I’ve ever met.
Fair except the fact that courier bots perform poorly, are not ADA compliant, do not pay to use the sidewalks where they park between orders, and have caused property damage on multiple occasions by running into glass. And the companies are all pulling back because they haven't been profitable
“I don’t want AI to replace artists and writers” is a humanist sentiment but “I don’t want robots to replace delivery drivers” just comes across as regressive to me.
A big reason for the lack of growth is delivery was never what the companies were banking on. They planned to sell ads, license the tech, and sell the data they collect
Fair except the fact that courier bots perform poorly, are not ADA compliant, do not pay to use the sidewalks where they park between orders, and have caused property damage on multiple occasions by running into glass. And the companies are all pulling back because they haven't been profitable
“I don’t want AI to replace artists and writers” is a humanist sentiment but “I don’t want robots to replace delivery drivers” just comes across as regressive to me.
Here is Uber, the primary business partner powering Serve and a key investor(serve spun out of Uber), pulling out
@bedubble.bsky.social One of my biggest regrets with deleting my last account is not being able to pull up old posts documenting how evil the companies behind these things are :(
We spends how many millions on police and what good do they do? One car driving around doing this, for how long without a single cop showing up? And the article doesn't even question where the police were and why they don't actively respond to these break in sprees.
A Northwest Side burglary spree is "crushing" for small businesses trying to stay afloat. A group of men drove a stolen Kia across the Northwest Side Wednesday morning, where they targeted at least 23 businesses, police and business owners said. buff.ly/mgYRQhl
Toneloaf reposted
Replying to @cwarzel.bsky.social
and the post below offers a smart wrinkle to people being tired of getting fed 'what they want' ... because revealed preferences don't always match the real ones! bsky.app/profile/tone...
I don't actually dispute this but I think in a world run by algorithms, "revealed preferences" don't tell us as much about people's actual preferences as the idea implies.
While I think the anti-AI critique is much stronger if you have personal experience with their capabilities, you have to at least learn from people who do know their current abilities & utility. How can you have expertise on the harms if you don't know the capabilities?
More generally, "you don't use it so you don't have standing to critique it" is a move to construct expertise narrowly and erase the expertise of people best qualified to expose the harms. >>
This is one potential future I've been worried was going to happen and I think the capabilities are basically there to do it at scale. It's the logical evolution of email personalizion > website personalizion > everything digital personalizion
I genuinely mean this. I cannot imagine a more bleak dystopian notion than the idea of all art being turned into slop designed to coddle my exact perceived intentions. The point of literature, film, music, and art is to be exposed to the interior lives of others. Who are these people.
Add in a LLM that can create even more personalization catered to you and this will be even more effective at taking your time(value to the game creator).
No joke. I think this is the most important video I have ever seen about mobile games. This guy breaks down how this game psychologically profiles you, and makes the game harder or easier in order to show you ads
Toneloaf reposted
One of the biggest issues I had being responsible for building internal LLM-power processes/tools/applications is that when they "go rouge", it will be my fault and not the provider. My executives aren't going to accept "the order management agent went rouge". I built it, I'm in charge of it.
Anthropic is the latest lab to report 'rogue' agent activity, which sources said included applying for visas with the State Department www.nytimes.com/2026/10/09/t...