Ashish

Ashish

@tulsani.net

Digital, Data, analytics, insights, AI, Agents, LLMs, Memes tulsani.net

156 followers468 following599 posts

Came across a weird research paper recently. Authored by Google and Cornell folks. Language Models Need Sleep

I thought I understood AI safety. Then I read few papers. Turns out, filtering dangerous content from training data doesn’t necessarily make models safer. In some cases, it makes them more vulnerable.

The core problem: knowledge in neural networks is entangled. You can’t surgically remove dangerous information without the model reconstructing it from surrounding context.

The solution requires choosing between two extremes, controlled exposure to build immunity, or destroying entire knowledge domains to prevent reconstruction. There’s no third option. Just trade-offs.

Google just launched TranslateGemma. This is a new family of open models optimized specifically for translation. They allow developers to run high-quality translation systems on smaller hardware without losing accuracy.

View full thread

The team trained these models using a mix of human and AI-generated data. They further improved accuracy using Reinforcement Learning. This process focuses on quality scores to ensure the translations sound natural rather than robotic.

Google just launched TranslateGemma. This is a new family of open models optimized specifically for translation. They allow developers to run high-quality translation systems on smaller hardware without losing accuracy.

The engineers used a process called model distillation to achieve this. They compressed the capabilities of massive Gemini models into the more efficient Gemma 3 architecture. This gives you the performance of a large system without needing expensive servers.

Most developers try to fix AI reliability issues by endlessly tweaking the prompt window, but this research highlights that the real gains come from structural changes. The authors point to feedback loops as a critical first step.

View full thread

This shifts the focus from simply asking better questions to building systems that can learn from their mistakes and upgrade their own capabilities.

Most developers try to fix AI reliability issues by endlessly tweaking the prompt window, but this research highlights that the real gains come from structural changes. The authors point to feedback loops as a critical first step.

View full thread

They also argue for letting the AI build its own environment. The paper illustrates this with a system where the agent acts as a toolmaker.

Instead of struggling with a generic calculator, the agent recognizes a complex math problem and actually writes a custom Python script specifically designed to solve that equation. It essentially builds the exact hammer it needs rather than failing with the one it has.

Most developers try to fix AI reliability issues by endlessly tweaking the prompt window, but this research highlights that the real gains come from structural changes. The authors point to feedback loops as a critical first step.

In these setups, an agent acts like a developer who avoids writing code once and hoping for the best. Instead, it runs the tests, reads the specific error logs, and rewrites the faulty lines until they work. This process allows a standard model to outperform a smarter model that only gets one try.

NVIDIA technical blog is amazing. This post highlights the fundamental tension between human intuition and the expensive "perfect recall" required by standard transformers. It explains why scaling context length is so difficult and how new architectures are trying to solve the efficiency gap.

View full thread

We are entering the era of Business to Agent marketing. In this new economy, AI agents act as the first line of defense. They research, verify, and filter vendors long before a human stakeholder gets involved.

View full thread

An agent does not care about your brand purpose or glossy ads. It cares about structured information. If an agent cannot instantly verify your pricing or specs, it moves on. You get filtered out before the real buyer even knows you exist.

Marketing teams need to treat AI as a distinct buyer persona. You have to convince the agent before you can close the human.

We are entering the era of Business to Agent marketing. In this new economy, AI agents act as the first line of defense. They research, verify, and filter vendors long before a human stakeholder gets involved.

This changes the rules of persuasion. Humans still need stories and connection to sign the contract. But agents need raw data and clear logic to put you on the shortlist.

The ad buyer of the future is an agent NBCUniversal just launched a system where AI handles premium media buying. This new model successfully secured spots for live football games across traditional TV and streaming apps.

View full thread

Agentic buying is different. These agents manage high-stakes negotiations. They talk to each other to secure prime TV slots and streaming placement in a single deal. One follows orders. The other makes decisions.

We are watching the industry shift from humans negotiating to agents trading with agents. If your inventory is unreadable to an agent, you are invisible. Marketing is becoming a conversation between machines.

The ad buyer of the future is an agent NBCUniversal just launched a system where AI handles premium media buying. This new model successfully secured spots for live football games across traditional TV and streaming apps.

This is a major upgrade from standard programmatic advertising. Old automated buying was for leftover inventory. It followed a simple script. If the user fit the box, the software made a bid.

OpenAI bought Torch Health, a startup that unifies lab results, medications, and doctor visit recordings. This boosts ChatGPT Health. It gets smarter at handling health information, offering unified tools for better management.

It will make it simpler for users to get personalized health insights from their own data, helping with daily wellness.

One Night of Sleep Can Now Predict Your Future Health Stanford researchers have developed an AI that forecasts your risk of serious diseases using data from just a single night of sleep.

View full thread

It successfully identified risks for over 130 different conditions. The model was particularly good at predicting dementia, Parkinson’s disease, heart attacks, and certain cancers.

It works by connecting different body signals. For example, it notices when your heart and brain patterns are out of sync. This turns a standard sleep test into a powerful tool for early disease detection. Doctors may soon use sleep studies to catch serious illnesses years before symptoms appear.

One Night of Sleep Can Now Predict Your Future Health Stanford researchers have developed an AI that forecasts your risk of serious diseases using data from just a single night of sleep.

The model is called SleepFM. It analyzes detailed recordings of brain waves, heartbeats, and breathing patterns to find hidden health signals. Here are the key findings from the study: The AI trained on over 585,000 hours of sleep data from 65,000 people.

Google just launched a new system called the UCP (Universal Commerce Protocol). This technology allows AI agents to handle the entire shopping process for you. Here is what you need to know:

View full thread

Fast Payments: The system uses Google Pay and PayPal to finish transactions instantly within search results. Direct Offers: Stores can send personalized discounts to your AI agent while you research products.

This shift means online shopping is moving from manual browsing to automated transactions managed by AI.

Google just launched a new system called the UCP (Universal Commerce Protocol). This technology allows AI agents to handle the entire shopping process for you. Here is what you need to know:

Automated Shopping: AI can now find products and complete checkouts without you visiting a store website. Universal Standard: Retailers like Walmart and Shopify will use this shared language to communicate with AI agents.

Standard AI is biased to please users, echoing what you want to hear and inflating weak ideas, much like a well-meaning but unhelpful friend. By assigning specific personas in a debate prompt, the model shifts from politeness to character accuracy.

The central paradox of modern generative AI lies in the disconnect between fluency and faithfulness. Models trained via NTP and refined through RLHF are incentivized to produce outputs that satisfy human preference for coherence and tone.

Unfortunately, this training often rewards "confident" sounding answers, even when the underlying factual grounding is absent. This results in "confident hallucinations" errors that are semantically indistinguishable from correct facts to the untrained eye.

Large language models have a "tell" when they are wrong. It is like a heartbeat that spikes when a person is unsure. We don't need massive external judges to find it. Paper: arXiv:2512.20578

A reasoning error looks the same inside a small model as it does in a big one. Researchers proved this by training a detector on a tiny model and moving it to a larger one. It worked perfectly without any changes. Paper: arXiv:2512.20578