Arthur Holland Michel

Arthur Holland Michel

@writearthur.bsky.social

Friendly reminders about spooky technologies. Bylines in The Economist, The Atlantic, Wired, MIT Technology Review, etc. Author of 'Eyes in the Sky' Research on AI and its discontents. https://www.arthurhollandmichel.com/

387 followers774 following432 posts

I'm struggling to see the value-add for the Vatican of doing this. Having discussions with tech leaders is one thing. Bringing them onstage is another. Maybe the Vatican thinks it shows that it has buy-in from a key mover. But many observers will read this as corporate capture.

Rich Raho@richraho.bsky.social

Pope Leo: “I want to thank Mr. Olah,” co-founder of Anthropic AI accept his invitation to walk together, to listen and to speak, and together to find a path for humanity in this time of artificial intelligence.”

If the market can’t punish companies for crappy products that nobody asked for—eg. sunglasses that spy on you, browsers that talk to you (and spy on you), AI companions that tell you to kill yourself (and spy on you) etc—then it’s not a market. It’s a prison.

Arthur Holland Michel reposted

In other AI news, prompt injections are here to stay based on this new paper from Abdelnabi and Bagdasarian. "an adversary can always construct a context under which a blocked flow appears legitimate, or a defender who tightens norms will block genuinely legitimate flows." arxiv.org/abs/2605.17634

arxiv.orgAI Agents May Always Fall for Prompt InjectionsPrompt injection is the most critical vulnerability in deployed AI agents. Despite recent progress, we show that the prevailing defense paradigm (data-instruction separation) both fails to detect atta...

It's good to see more people challenging the metaphor of the AI race. I wrote a report about this for @chathamhouse.org in 2023, and I think a lot of the findings still hold water today. www.chathamhouse.org/2023/04/reca...

chathamhouse.orgRecalibrating assumptions on AITowards an evidence-based and inclusive AI policy discourse
Lawfare@lawfaremedia.org

The "AI race" with China is Washington's excuse to deregulate and skip safety. But AI knowledge spreads fast, racing accelerates rivals, and there's no finish line. From @arbel.bsky.social and @mtokson.bsky.social www.lawfaremedia.org/article/the-...

Friendly reminder that there are a ton of people out there writing good, informative, interesting books and articles without a jot of AI assistance. They won’t get any recognition for it whatsoever. The fact that they have to compete for bylines with people who secretly use AI is dumb and sad.

Look I know peer reviewers are super busy and they often don't get paid, but if you're not checking the citations then what you are doing is not peer review.

Philip N Cohen@philipncohen.com

Two new facts stand out: 1. 85% of hallucinated citations in preprints are also in the subsequent journal version (thanks, peer review!) 2. Fake cites more likely to use the names of (male) scholars who are already highly cited, creating a fake-citation Matthew effect. arxiv.org/abs/2605.07723

In case you needed any further proof of just how thoroughly drones have transformed warfare. Nobody is safe from aerial attack anymore, no matter where they are.

I just had a long conversation with a senior SEO exec and I don't think we're ready for the absolute shit-storm that's in store for us once companies go all in on optimizing webpages for agents. If you thought the web was unpleasant now, buckle up.

Except for the reference to ChatGPT, every single word in this story—from insisting that a breakthrough is imminent, to the glossy portrayal of a world where robots make coffee and stock supermarket shelves, and the buried lede on ethical questions—could have been written a decade ago.

NPR@npr.org

Scientists say they've made a key breakthrough that would allow robots to figure out complex tasks on their own — but experts say it raises questions about how much risk comes with letting robots be in charge of their own learning. n.pr/4e2OlgF

This company started out making small unarmed robotic sailboats for environmental monitoring. Now it has unveiled the 170-foot, 250 ton "Spectre," which can be equipped with a range of missiles for anti-sub warfare and other attack roles. www.saildrone.com/news/introdu...

saildrone.comIntroducing Saildrone Spectre: Next-gen USV for ASW and VLS Strike – SaildroneSaildrone’s largest, fastest, and most capable platform to date, Spectre is designed to fill a critical ASW capability gap and deliver high-speed and stealth kinetic strike.

The U.S. spends around two million dollars to shoot down each $35,000 Iranian drone. Iran spends a few hundred thousand dollars shoot down each $30 million U.S. drone. dronexl.co/2026/04/20/2...

dronexl.co24 MQ-9 Reapers Lost Over Iran: A $720 Million ProblemOperation Epic Fury has cost the US Air Force 24 MQ-9 Reaper drones since late February. At roughly $30 million per airframe, the losses add up to around $720
Arthur Holland Michel@writearthur.bsky.social

Everyone who was paying attention saw it coming. In some circles the drone cost asymmetry discussion has been raging for a decade.

Arthur Holland Michel reposted

I used Amazon's new AI bot for recommending books based on my reading habits. One of the recommendations appears to be a shoe.

Everyone who was paying attention saw it coming. In some circles the drone cost asymmetry discussion has been raging for a decade.

People are having a great time dunking on this by saying things like "my car also goes faster than a human" but I doubt they'll be so smug when they're getting chased down an alley by one of these things for attending a protest.

NPR@npr.org

The winner from Honor, a Chinese smartphone maker, completed the race in 50 minutes and 26 seconds, running faster than the human world record in a show of China's technological leaps. n.pr/4sP50Ij

This makes no sense.

Dr Francis Young@drfrancisyoung.bsky.social

Perhaps the darkest argument I’ve heard in favour of writing with AI is that there’s no point writing without it; we’ll all be consuming so much AI-generated content unwittingly that it will re-programme our writing styles and thought patterns. Humans who write without AI will sound like AI anyway.

Drone operators controlling drones in the battlefield from outside of Ukraine. Interesting questions here about individuals taking on active combatant status despite being far beyond an active war zone.

Wild Hornets 🐝@wildhornets.bsky.social

‼️ Incredible record: controlling interceptor STING at a distance of 2,000 km using HORNET VISION Ctrl While abroad, the pilot controlled interceptor STING operating in northern Ukraine. 1/2

I wrote about some previous studies on this last year, and what struck me is that while it is obvious that people who use AI to think for them will do less thinking, it is alarming just how drastic the effect is and how quickly these dependencies take hold. www.economist.com/science-and-...

economist.comWill AI make you stupid?Creativity and critical thinking might take a hit. But there are ways to soften the blow
Maggie Harrison Dupré@mharrisondupre.bsky.social

NEW: A new pre-print study offers the first causal evidence that outsourcing reasoning tasks to AI can rapidly erode users' independent performance AND their will to persist despite difficulty. "People’s persistence drops... they’re also not willing to try without AI.” futurism.com/artificial-i...