Zach Weinersmith

Zach Weinersmith

@zachweinersmith.bsky.social

New Book out this summer: Sawyer Lee and the Quest to Just Stay Home. Other things of mine: Bea Wolf, A City on Mars, and SMBC Website: www.smbc-comics.com Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/ZachWeinersmith?ty=h

67K followers974 following13.2K posts

Pinned

Thanks y'all. We made the supposedly uncrackable bestseller list for middle grade novels. It is typically dominated by huge names as you can see. So, this is a real triumph. The next-shortest tenure on the list is 7 weeks and most have been on the last for close to a year.

Zach Weinersmith reposted

🔴 DERNIÈRE SEMAINE 🔴 Haxo est ma BD thriller/humour. Projet inachevé que j'avais promis de terminer si on atteignait 1000 ventes. On est à + de 1500. -Je dessine la suite -Quand c'est fini, vous aurez sans repayer la fin de l'album -20% des ventes financent l'artiste suivant ( @pinssss.bsky.social )

This post is unavailable.

A tough thing in explaining to people why having children is enjoyable is that all the bad stuff is very easy to explain (lost sleep, lost time, more sickness, less sex, etc. etc.) whereas most of the really good stuff whispers.

I am 100% in favor of people who don't want kids not having kids, but watching your kids play on the beach on a day where all your responsibilities are asleep is a peak human experience of a type you will struggle to get elsewhere.

Hey econs: So, Francis Fukuyama dislikes the idea of rational utility maximizers because it doesn't account for thymos. But isn't thymos a statement about where the utility function comes from (and possibly how it is affected by other people), not about whether the actor is a rational maximizer?

So, last year I ran around planting either native tree seeds or rootstock. This year I'm trying to lay my hands on a lot of scionwood, and the big skill upgrade I'm gonna attempt is grafting. Anyone have any hot tips? (or scionwood?)

First surprise problem so far is, having made my target list, no single nursery has more than 15-20% of it. Which is not ideal from the point of view of wishing to avoid a small fortune in shipping costs.

The hard thing is that I'm trying to have a no-spray orchard in a very humid part of the country, so I have to be extremely selective about cultivars. And often they're weird unpopular ones out of certain breeding programs. BUT, it'll be cool once I have it all assembled, anyway.

a) that award committees aren't so smart b) that award committees don't care about quality c) that ai can write good fiction (honestly not my impression, but I've never tried to convince one to write a book) d) that it's all relative, and a crapshoot, and ai is just more crapshoot entries

Dunno what's going on in this case, but on a smaller scale there appear to be scammers who spam literary magazines and prizes. It'd be interesting to know if they're using a straight output from, say, ChatGPT, or if they've actually built elaborate harnesses for fiction production.

One problem we've already seen crop up, and which I suspect will become more frequent, is not just that you can have ai write for you, but you can say "write in a way that appeals to the biases of publishers and award committees."

I'm not the kind of writer who wins these sorts of awards, and don't have a lot of intuition about whether they indicate anything. Though it seems like you have to conclude one of the following:

Do you think if Trump hadn't been elected there would also be fewer populist-right parties and leaders rising elsewhere? Meaning, like, are there lots of people who reactively support the populist right when they see it rising elsewhere, either via inspiration or fear (or something else)?

I guess she's known as a food writer, and she does talk a lot about food, but she reminds me a lot of Joan Didion, in her ability to capture a place, a time, her experience of it, and nothing else.

Suppose in a couple centuries the genre of Fantasy isn't really around any more, and people try to describe it the way we now describe old genres that were popular for a long time, like picaresque. What would be the couple-sentence description?

View full thread

Like, something fascinating about Fantasy is we're so marinated in it, it feels like a category as wide as e.g. comedy or tragedy. But it's generally *extremely* specific and fairly recent.

Suppose in a couple centuries the genre of Fantasy isn't really around any more, and people try to describe it the way we now describe old genres that were popular for a long time, like picaresque. What would be the couple-sentence description?

I feel you might say something like the fantasy genre was the result of combining Scandinavian mythology and the British Isles fairy tale traditions, often with the influence of classical epic and/or Christian tradition. Strangely it was very popular among technologists.

I got a guy mad at me for using "superintelligence" because it's Trump-associated and another guy happy with me for using superintelligence in the pre-Trump sense, and by God I didn't even know about the Trump thing?

Interestingly, the word superintelligence goes back to at least 1822, but of course didn't refer to ai back then. Ultraintelligence was coined in the 60s but doesn't seem to have caught. Bostrom famously used "Superintelligence" as a book title, but it wasn't my impression that he invented it.

This is probably not a great time to say this, but one thing growing trees has convinced me of is that food is insanely cheap. Like a really well-managed apple tree can produce a few hundred apples a year. This is a full grown tree that took years to reach matured, which is regularly managed.

And yet you can get apples for less than a dollar a piece in a preserving wax coating in an aesthetically pleasant plastic bag, in multiple varieties at any grocery store at any time of year. The economies of scale must be insane for it to ever return a profit to the orchards.

This is niche but hey population ethics people: why can't we get a natural blocker on the Repugnant Conclusion by just saying if the density of barely-happy people gets too high the planet will implode?