Post

this is the really ineffective head-in-the-sand reaction a lot of folks on Bluesky tend to have if you talk about any harm reduction-based approach to the reality that millions of people are using AI tools today. The current approach to critiquing AI is obviously not working, but they don't care.

IDK, man. People actually have every right to decide they don't want to listen to AI-enabling rhetoric, particularly when the technology is currently actively harming folks. It's good and fine to set boundaries, mute, and block accounts that upset you + bogus to put a small account on blast for it.

I don't understand why you extrapolate so much from one user curating their social media experience by removing you from the conversations they interact with. I don't think that their choice to engage on their terms has any detrimental impact on discourse. I don't assume they only engage online. 🤷🏻‍♀️

There was a larger conversation going on prior to that; I am assuming you likely encountered that post in isolation because somebody wanted to dunk on it. It’s far from the entirety of the point I was making, or even a particularly significant part of it.

No, I found it because I follow you and was catching up on feeds when I saw this post pointing directly to the account of one person with fewer than 500 followers while making no effort to prevent dunking over a curation decision that I frankly think you are magnifying far beyond its actual scope.