Post

This piece refuses to mention that Musk personally restored the count of a user who shared CSAM material on the platform, and *pays that user to be on the platform*. Why do cover up this pertinent fact? And why is the author’s byline linked to their profile on the child sexual abuse platform?

63 reposts262 likes

Not to mention the fact that he openly stated his intent to make his LLM and GenAI tools without safeguards and restrictions. Seems like that demonstrates intent in the case of any incoming lawsuit.

Live in a blue state? Contact your State AG, report a violation of state CSAM law. By who, they'll ask. And you say Elon Musk. Offer to send them a copy of the WRITTEN CONFESSION given via GROK of this violation. Request they subpoena X for the names of accounts that requested CSAM from Grok.