Post

They don't care about preservation, they just care about profits, preservation is not profitable to them, just something to keep in mind before making deals or such with them.

The music industry should fund the international sound archive. Australia and Britain have respectively the National Film and Sound Archive and the British Library Sound Archive. It's history, ya know.

Who battles the rationale of archiving, save for those who stand to profit? This feels precursor to a lot of dark sci-fi. No imaginable good shall come from corporate control over crucial libraries, and we stand to lose another entity designed for access to shared knowledge and experience.

Pro-preservation first, artist valued more, then Moguls bottom line. We need music to survive. We cannot build a house of music by destroying too many roots and trees of past artists works. How many songs do we remember from ancient civilisations ? Music and performances lost forever.

If we preserve the music of the past eventually all music will be copyright free as all combinations of whatever minimum length will have been done and that would sap profits so of course you have to destroy anything over a profitable age old so it can be copyrighted anew and make them new money

For decades Internet Archive has been a staple for live music lovers! Where else can I go and pull up my first ever Ekoostik Hookah show, relive for a couple hours the memories of NYE 2005? Or how about the short 4 song set where I discovered Umphreys McGee at a random single day festival?

I just donated what I could. But you need to replace the “Share to X” with “Share to BlueSky”. Those who remain on X have no idea how important your organization is and would’t support you if they did.

Sorry, but America is corrupt from top to bottom. Corrupt recording company executives have all the money and power; the recording artists (who, after all, are the suppliers of content, in the first place), are helpless. Don't like this? You shouldn't have voted for Trump.

That's quite true and of course it has been this way in the U.S. for decades now. The (sort of) defensible concept of "copyright" has, in the U.S., been weaponized by rich people and corporations, into something far more expansive than its original purpose.