Post

Chris Green SEO
@chris-green.net

Here is another good glimpse of a future compensation model for AI. Paying publishers for using their content. For everyone who thinks Publishers are facing an existential crisis, this may suggest a potential alternate future. 🧵 1/3

seroundtable.comGoogle Search Console Testing Paying Publishers For Use Of Content In AI - Al Contribution PilotGoogle is doing a small test where it is paying publishers for using their content within the Google AI Overviews, AI Mode, Gemini and other AI search features. This is called the AI contribution…

0 reposts2 likes

Chris Green SEO
@chris-green.net

This raises many, many more questions than it does answers for me. How do you calculate the worth of being part of an answer? Is this worth enough for a publisher? How do you stop these mechanics from being manipulated by scrapers? The list goes on. 🧵 2/3

seroundtable.comGoogle Search Console Testing Paying Publishers For Use Of Content In AI - Al Contribution PilotGoogle is doing a small test where it is paying publishers for using their content within the Google AI Overviews, AI Mode, Gemini and other AI search features. This is called the AI contribution…
Chris Green SEO
@chris-green.net

Without a sustainable way for people to be paid to generate unique, human-written, valuable content, the whole content ecosystem falls apart. Will this work? www.seroundtable.com/google-al-co... 🧵 3/3

seroundtable.comGoogle Search Console Testing Paying Publishers For Use Of Content In AI - Al Contribution PilotGoogle is doing a small test where it is paying publishers for using their content within the Google AI Overviews, AI Mode, Gemini and other AI search features. This is called the AI contribution…
Matt Wright 🤞
@honed.co

Interesting read!: 😬 "A generative search ecosystem is viable only if its extraction rate leaves enough revenue to pay for that renewal."