Here is another good glimpse of a future compensation model for AI. Paying publishers for using their content. For everyone who thinks Publishers are facing an existential crisis, this may suggest a potential alternate future. 🧵 1/3
Post
seroundtable.comGoogle Search Console Testing Paying Publishers For Use Of Content In AI - Al Contribution PilotGoogle is doing a small test where it is paying publishers for using their content within the Google AI Overviews, AI Mode, Gemini and other AI search features. This is called the AI contribution…
This raises many, many more questions than it does answers for me. How do you calculate the worth of being part of an answer? Is this worth enough for a publisher? How do you stop these mechanics from being manipulated by scrapers? The list goes on. 🧵 2/3
seroundtable.comGoogle Search Console Testing Paying Publishers For Use Of Content In AI - Al Contribution PilotGoogle is doing a small test where it is paying publishers for using their content within the Google AI Overviews, AI Mode, Gemini and other AI search features. This is called the AI contribution…
Without a sustainable way for people to be paid to generate unique, human-written, valuable content, the whole content ecosystem falls apart. Will this work? www.seroundtable.com/google-al-co... 🧵 3/3
seroundtable.comGoogle Search Console Testing Paying Publishers For Use Of Content In AI - Al Contribution PilotGoogle is doing a small test where it is paying publishers for using their content within the Google AI Overviews, AI Mode, Gemini and other AI search features. This is called the AI contribution…
0 reposts0 likes
This is a bit of self-promotion but I wrote a game theory paper on this subject, currently available on arxiv : arxiv.org/html/2608.15... Last section is about several mechanisms to avoid the so-called erosion
arxiv.orgWhen Search Eats the WebA Model of Corpus Erosion under Generative Extraction