Post

Ghostly Bree
@mostlybree.kitrocha.com

I'm just gonna say: it somewhat baffles me that people who are understandably skeptical of opaque LLMs as legitimate sources of information will suddenly go full on "the computer KNOWS" when they are using opaque tools to "detect" AI. The computer does not know.

Susanna Kearsley@susannakearsley.bsky.social

❤️ Gillian Green, publisher at Tor Bramble, told The Bookseller: “HM Wolfe has confirmed that Daggermouth was written entirely without AI. We stand behind our author, and we do not recognise third-party AI detection tools as a fair or reliable measure of authenticity when used on their own.”

thebookseller.comTor Bramble backs HM Wolfe after AI-detection claims over DaggermouthTor Bramble has backed HM Wolfe after the Atlantic reported that the author’s dystopian romance Daggermouth returned a 60% score in an analysis using the AI-detection tool Pangram.
Ghostly Bree
@mostlybree.kitrocha.com

I haven't read Daggermouth and I haven't even read the weird article about it because I find strange investigations based on ~analyzing~ the text to be... Questionable. But I don't like the fact that the self-appointed AI police are proceeding with such reckless ignorance and unhinged confidence.

Dave Singleton
@dfsingleton.com

The other day I put into a checker a paragraph from a document that is a decade old at this point, and it said that 2/3 of that paragraph was AI generated. The detection tools are garbage.

5 reposts30 likes

felt smart, might delete later
@outeast.bsky.social

One of the most exhausting things about the "AI" cycle is that every skill, every trick, every tool and every piece of published research is out of date by the time we master them. Even the most solid research is generations out of date by the time it's published. It's why the hype cycle dominates.