Post

The NY Times saves its harshest skepticism for progressives. Instead of being impressed by 3,000+ coordinated protests, NYT dismisses the value of “hitting a number” and asks if No Kings will be “a primal scream that fades into a whimper.” F off, NY Times. We'll defeat fascism w/o you. (Gift link)

nytimes.comA Challenge for ‘No Kings’ Protests, the Third Time Around

Gladstone in DC

@district.blue

Interesting if the article compares the size of these protests to the miniscule size of the Tea Party protests. Oh.

28/3/26, 2:55 pm1 repost12 likes

Bethankit Hums

@tangibullah.bsky.social

28 Mar

Even if the Wikipedia page is gone, Murc's Law lives on!