Post

If you are cis ("not transgender") I need to explain this to you. Bluesky today posted this vague thread, announcing-without-spelling-out that they're allowing a writer, net troll and anti-trans activist named Jesse Singal to stay on the platform, despite every trans user saying it makes us unsafe.

Bluesky Safety@safety.bsky.app

In the past month alone, over 12M people joined Bluesky, with daily active users growing 10x. We received more reports in two days than in all of last year, and have integrated new systems and quadrupled our moderation team to try and keep up. Sometimes, we have to work quickly to correct errors.

This is the heart of the thread: They're looking at the one specific rules violation Singal is being reported for *currently*. And they're saying, this doesn't count as a rules violation, because he was careful enough to stay within the strict lines of the rule as written.

Bluesky Safety@safety.bsky.app

We do not currently take action on accounts that share Bluesky screenshots with commentary, unless that commentary violates our Guidelines. We will take action when someone's private information is shared without their consent, but only when it is personally identifiable and verifiable in-app.

But you can have private profiles, or public ones blocking non logged user visualization (enforcement of blocking rules), moderation lists, simple mutes, and simple blocks. Isn't it enough? (Don't even know who the cited person in question is, this is a genuine curiosity)

So it's true that Bluesky has better personal safety tools than Twitter (although you *can't* actually have private profiles on bluesky… if I'm not mistaken you have a private profile so just to warn you, it is not doing quite what you probably think it is)

But in the end it just can't be enough to protect you if a harassment culture develops for the site at large. You can't solve a social/cultural problem with technical solutions. And if you have a determined adversary willing to do things like make dupe accounts, they can overcome your tools.

0 reposts13 likes

If it helps, here's a thread describing the experiences I've had that guide my thinking here: bsky.app/profile/drya...

mcc@dryad.technology

In 2014 I was a Twitter user. There was a pretty healthy little trans community there, we kept to ourselves, no one bothered us. Then a group called "gamergate" started targeting "sjw"s on the site, starting with my friends in indie games. Suddenly my community was targeted by swarms of sockpuppets…

Oh, one other thing. You mention moderation lists. But if you look closely at bluesky's moderation lists, you'll find there are LOTS of "troll" lists made up to look like something desirable but actually doing something else…there's one guy who adds everyone who blocks him to a "Russian plants" list

In particular, there's a tendency for people to make copies of "anti-trans trolls" lists, and add a bunch of trans people near the bottom! I don't know what their proof is, but I've seen Kiwifarms specifically blamed for this (because KF is definitely on the site… I didn't mention them arbitrarily).

I understand your points and in my pov the main problem is actually the lack of private profiles. However, there are two other important points: - I believe this lack of private profiles is due to the technology associated with atproto, which makes it possible for us to leave here and go (+)

Vetting moderation lists is a problem (all the more so because even good ones screw up occasionally and need some slack). There might be things the site itself could do to make it easier ("recommended by..." tags or something), but off-site community resources might be needed. (If *that* works...)

I bring this up to observe *any technical measure can be gamed*. Tech is predictable, so if tech blocks you from doing a thing, you can just change your tactics to something the tech doesn't cover. Sometimes you can even harness technical measures to *further* trolling, IE bluesky shared blocklists.