Post

I think Ed is spot on about the over-hyping and over-spending on AI, but I think he is off on the "not early days" argument. 8 years out from an academic paper is nothing. A better comparison would be between the introduction of the Apple Newton (93) and the iPhone (07). Love your work Ed.

The argument is that the amount of capital, media and societal pressure has speed run this. I also bring up the iPhone and this is nothing like the iPhone! Anyway thank you for listening seriously

The "speed run" will not happen. That is more likely to blow up the economy and set development back. I respectfully disagree about the Newton. It was an early attempt at a computational consumer device. I would argue current chat is a lot more like the Newton than the iPhone, in more ways than one

No, the speed run already is happening. I don't think that Chat is like the Newton at all, because that was an operating system AND hardware problem that was solved in a completely different way to how Newton handled things

AI is a blanket term. It has seen a lot of success in some areas. It has failed to replace humans. It may never successfully do that, but this flavor of chatbot is fairly new (less than 3 years). I don't think we are 3-5 years from AGI (whatever that means), but what else has it "failed" to do?

Liking the show - just in case you weren’t aware (I’m sure you are) people from other countries than US, UK, and Canada listen - and also say Zed not Zee.

I just think it's wild that AI boosties are all like, "AI is like the internet" and in reality, it's a stolen bastardized fucked up facsimile of the internet, while also being the thing that's destroying it in the end, I hope AI is only known as the thing that brought about the Dead Internet