Post

"AI will let us turn PhDs from 4 year degrees into 6 month degrees!" Literally shitting on the part that makes it intellectual development. It requires things like *reading* for yourself and *writing* for yourself. Those aren't chores, they're part of skills acquisition and critical development.

162 reposts689 likes

I have heard "I only use AI for the first draft" as if that's cool, and not the draft where you do all the idea forming and synthesis. I guess the point of research is to generate papers right? Point of writing is to generate words?

To have any worthwhile career prospects as a PhD, you have to be an expert in your field with original ideas.That has to be obvious in interviews, seminars, and even hallway conversations. If your only skill is coaxing AI into doing expert-like things, good luck!

Doesn't seem implausible that a candidate using AI might only 6 months of growth out of the 4 years they spent prompting their thesis (charitably I'm assuming they would try to learn enough to be able to intelligently prompt the bot)

These new forklifts are going to turn 1 hour workouts into a 5 minute breeze. They can bench press those weights so fast.

Trying to reduce knowledge work to a simple issue of "productivity" whereby more words is better, the content of the words doesn't really matter as long as you can produce enough.

This is literally how publication records are assessed in tenure reviews & hiring, & how academic publishing works. Publishers don't expect their books & articles to be read, only published so that applicants can have publications on their CVs. It's why academic publishers' books are so expensive

I’m sure it would be very valuable reading, but the institutions simply don’t value research as something to be read & used in the discipline. It’s become a purposeless spinning of wheels & it leaves the creative people who make the research out in the cold