Post

1/ Here's how it works (for others, Oz knows). A story breaks and every news show needs guests to talk about it. A desperately overworked producer frantically searches Twitter/BlueSky and starts DMing people who seem like they have credentials. The producer likely knows nothing about the topic.

Oz Katerji@ozkaterji.bsky.social

There is no accountability in ThinkTankLand or in TenuredProfesorsville. You can just walk into broomstick after broomstick for two decades and still pull in a 6 figure salary and a primetime apperance on a major tv news channel with a three letter acronym. Nothing matters.

/2 If someone says yes then at most they have a 5 minute chat with the producer to work out some questions. This is mostly used to check name pronunciation. They go on TV/Radio for 3-7 minutes. If they sound coherent, the producer adds them to a shared network CRM database.

3/ The next time an expert is needed, they get a call, often from an entirely different producer. Absolutely no one is going back and updating the CRM by confirming expert predictions against what occurred 4 months later. That is no one's job.

4/ Individual presenters may have experts they particularly like and may be able to do some screening, but most are way too busy to do retroactive monitoring and evaluation. The key criteria in complex topics are credentials, confidence, and clear diction.

5/ Most news operations are simply too understaffed, too overworked and chasing too many deadlines to do more than have a few favourite experts on frequently recurring topics.

No replies yet.