Post

Prior tech booms, even the NFT Moment, did seem to have more of a collective sense that an opportunistic normal person could cash in on them (and some did). Now, it *feels* like only the employees of a very small number of companies and their investors are actually *profiting* from the AI boom.

The argument seems to be more that “these tools will help normal people build stuff that they can make money off of,” but where’s the evidence that this is happening? People ARE using LLMs to code Stuff, often quite cool stuff - but is this making them money? Idk?

Feels like tech has long had the baked in assumption that people making stuff will = Money for at least some of them (with good timing and luck) - and it at least FEELS (again) like this is breaking down rapidly.

It also FEELS like companies do not have the foggiest idea how to hire or fund people who have become genuinely good at using The Robot

In the long wake of the Great Recession, the classic tiresome, pat answer to people who couldn’t find a decent job was “learn to code.” Now, do we have a similarily oversimplified yet sorta-plausible answer for people who no longer can find stable employment? I don’t think we do. That’s unsettling.

I see some people trying to claim the new answer to “I can’t find a job” is “healthcare,” but you can tell their heart isn’t really in it.

And I mean, yeah, if you know healthcare workers, you probably also know that working in healthcare (if you don’t have a genuine interest in it) really does not seem like a particularly attractive proposition right now

It is true that there IS a very obvious and apparently rather easy way for normal people to make money off of GenAI right now: unfortunately this way is “scams.”

26 reposts242 likes

Need to find a way to scam the Epstein class out of their grip on power. How about a party on a new island in the sea that is in fact completely illusionary so the planes just land in the sea? Can I get VC funding for this? Will result in massive productivity gains?

I wonder if all the advertising I have been seeing recently for various AI enterprises is as much to normalize the idea of AI as worth supporting (or at least not opposing) as it is to actually get any normal person to make a purchase. It's not like most people will buy AI the way we would a car or

some beer. Even the business consultant ads you see on, say, golf broadcasts, are aimed at the kind of rich corporate person who might reasonably be expected to be in the market for such services. But AI? During an NFL broadcast?

This *is* one of the many places where they fucked up. The news media does approach viewers as shareholders and business owners instead of workers first, but people who do PR ought to know who’s watching and answer the “what’s in it for me?” question behind the questions adequately.

this just feels like the natural end state of an economy that no longer rewards an honest living according to its own set rules between this, that football instagram scammer and the literal song openly praising scammers