Post

Nick Beckstead, noted longtermist and "effective altruist,” just comes out and says it: "But it now seems more plausible to me that saving a life in a rich country is substantially more important than saving a life in a poor country, other things being equal."

it's not obvious to me from this paragraph whether he is actually endorsing this view or just describing a view (and explaining what implications it would have), not that I need any particular convincing that longtermism in general is worth opposing

No replies yet.