Post

Nick Beckstead, noted longtermist and "effective altruist,” just comes out and says it: "But it now seems more plausible to me that saving a life in a rich country is substantially more important than saving a life in a poor country, other things being equal."

it's not obvious to me from this paragraph whether he is actually endorsing this view or just describing a view (and explaining what implications it would have), not that I need any particular convincing that longtermism in general is worth opposing

@xriskology.bsky.social has way more direct knowledge of these people than I do so asking him, but I do think this worldview is 100% borne out by their actual actions, especially in recent years.

0 reposts46 likes

is EA charity/philanthrophy more skewed towards rich countries than charity/philanthropy in general (or resource allocation in general)? my guess would be that even after longtermist stuff it's probably overall less skewed, not more, but maybe someone with real information can correct this?