Post

Please read this article on the massive weirdos who are largely running the massively powerful and big-money AI industry in the U.S. today.

This post is unavailable.

I genuinely feel bad for Eliezer Yudkowsky and his partner over the very real terror they seem to feel about AI killing us all - but these are not well people and they need therapy, not insanely influential advisory roles at the top of government and industry. time.com/6266923/ai-e...

“Yudkowsky is the person who connected Shane Legg and Demis Hassabis to Peter Thiel so that they could secure funding to start DeepMind, which is now Google's AI research division.” Yep, that’s the wacky sex cult AI doomer guy proving instrumental in Peter Thiel funding DeepMind.

verysane.aiAI Safety Is Mostly A Sex Cult In Berkeley, CaliforniaWe might some day have “AI Safety”, as a science or policy area, that is not primarily a sex cult in Berkeley, California, but it does not currently exist.

And once again, here’s OpenAI CEO Sam Altman in 2023, praising wacky AI sex cult blogger Eliezer Yudkowsky and speculating on if he deserves a Nobel Peace Prize:

Almost the entire US technology policy space has been taken over by rich funders and consultants who genuinely believe the below wackadoodle sci-fi AI scenario is extremely likely, and that preventing it is the most important thing we could be doing right now. www.verysane.ai/p/ai-safety-...

Eliezer Yudkowsky - who, again, is immensely influential among the leaders of big AI companies and the US tech policy ecosystem that his rich fans have all but taken over - seems to think the only way to stop the AI apocalypse is doing straight-up eugenics to make “smarter people.”

Tech billionaires give them tons of money to sit around doing it. Seriously.

1 repost45 likes

That’s your problem, efficient sentences will kill you with these types. Reading circuitous bullshit that you have to struggle to parse makes them feel smart, especially if the conclusion is counterintuitive (read: apparently mentally unwell). NB, this is also how we got Derrida and Zizek

jfc i swear to you i am not making this up i had derrida and foucault in my head while reading "circuitous bullshit that you have to struggle to parse" and then got to the end and screamed

LLMs are statistics models of text occurrences, not thinking machines. LLMs deal only in text, not meaning, inflrmation, or logic. On top of that, lots of the content they’re trained on is from internet sources likely chosen & ranked via tech bro bias, which likely includes pseudo-intellectual BS.

Exactly; they’re pseudo-intellectuals, not intellectuals. They’re performing and feeling, not actually being competent thinkers. Circuitous and fallacious logic is typical in such people.