Post

Going forward, Nazi tattoos are a dealbreaker. Right? Right?!

Platner Principal: any person with a Nazi tattoo is prone to heinous scandal.

In any case, the people who warned of Platner’s many, many, many red flags were right. Those who ignored them should feel deeply humbled, and should remember this lesson the next time they wanna fall head over heels for magic toxic progressive dudebro.

@gilduran.com I think the real problem here is that the Democratic establishment is so feckless and captured by corporate interests, that the base was desperate for anyone with a spine and a pulse. This is on Planter and Schumer.

Roger Stone said Katie Hill had Nazi tattoo, but yes.

And then what happened?

The Platner Principle is actually that someone who lies repeatedly, reflexively, at the least bit of trouble, who has so little self-control that he has to embellish every story - that person has terrible judgment and will have scandals. This covers more people than those with Nazi tattoos. 1/

No, my point is specifically about Nazi tattoos. Sorry.

Seems extremely reasonable, but times are desperate.

The Dems are up by +13 in pretty much every statewide election, they could win Maine with a high school intern. But they cannot win with a rapist.

no. a nazi tattoo on a non-nazi is not a deal breaker. being a dirt bag is no matter the tat. a dirty bag is the problem.

Anyone with a Nazi tattoo is a Nazi. No contrary argument is valid.

mmmm. not sold. 70s punk rockers put swastikas on their jackets. he was never at a nazi event. spouting off on redit abt nazi ideology. it seems it was some dark humor when he and his military comrades were disillusioned with war/killing and said they were like nazis.

Yeah no my man, it should always be enough to have a NAZI tattoo on your fucking body.

omg. this nazi. link.springer.com/chapter/10.1...