Post

Fewer people would probably feel the need to use adblockers if advertisers could be trusted not to destroy the functionality of websites, which they obviously cannot be. "Everything works fine for me" okay try using any second-tier news site on your phone

25 reposts285 likes

Aye. Kill the trackers. Vet the ads. Place them where they won't fuck up what people came for. uBlock will vanish within a month. Or spend millions trying to squeeze out a bit more "shareholder value" from folks who will fight you every step of the way. Arrogant dumbasses chose the latter.

Also, it is known that [some] advertisers strive to collect personally-identifiable data about those on whom their ads are inflicted, and some of those sell the data they have collected, and some of the data that is sold ends up in malicious hands.

What's funny is it's not even the just the ad stuff on every news site that makes it unusable. It's the autoplaying videos and any number of other random shit your phone starts to run when you're just trying to read something. Just horrible design choices of doing too much.

"everything works fine from me" from a person who doesn't realize that pop up blocking is so ubiquitous at this point that browsers have it set as a security setting by default

Also, my current hobby horse I'm trying to get people to spread: The value of the data they have on us has *never* been what they believe it to be, and the more they collect, the less valuable it becomes every day. Consumer capture has come through *consolidation*, NOT focused ads.

I tried keeping it off for a webcomic I read, but there's now a Gemini AI popup that's part of the ad-sense suite that loads in every time, so it was finally time to push the button on that site as well. (Just checked to see that it's still there)

I was definitely an “ad-blockers are antisocial” scold until that position became literally untenable. It went from “if you want the open internet to continue to exist, we need ads” to “the open internet currently does not function unless you block ads”

The vehemently anti-adblock position basically boils down to "personal computing shouldn't exist and technology should only be configured by the companies that made it" If I'm not allowed to control what my devices do and what data comes into them, sorry, but that's a dystopia.

I think the argument is that ads are what support content that we are able to view for free, that content is valuable, and that avoiding ads robs those outlets of the revenue they need to continue publishing. All of that is true too. But malicious adware ruins it

Yeah, i like the idea of ad supported content! It's just that the ads became tracking software that slows your device down, and expecting people to put up with that as if its the same thing as a TV commercial is delusional. It's really sad that nobody's cracked micropayments in 30 years.