Post

This is a great informational thread that is clarifying, but doesn't really negate my actual issue. While the personal freedoms are nice perks, you're still being paid criminally low wages. The point still stands, that $5-10 a day even with a 1 dollar bump is allowing the state to side step funding.

Matthew Hahn@matthewhahn.com

I am a former incarcerated firefighter. I served in a California fire camp from 2009 to 2012. Misinformation is afire on the internet, so here are facts about the prison firefighter program, all in one place. A thread.

137 reposts786 likes

I haven't seen much folks talk about it, but many have been saying a benefit to doing the volunteer work gets them out of the prison and away from all the abuses that come with it like that's a good thing. It feels like it kinda takes away a bit from the whole "voluntary" bit of the program

Agreed. I'm all for allowing incarcerated people to work, especially if can be used to help them find a good job when they're out. But they still deserve to be paid the same wage as everyone else, which they could use to rebuild their lives at the other end of their sentence.

To be clear, I'll fight that fight. But I don't expect it to be won in my lifetime. (I'm the kind of sick that never gets better and eventually, at some unspecified future time, will kill me. I've beaten rough odds just getting this far.)

California: This is awesome! We're saving so much on cheap labor for firefighters! People: That is a solid compromise, so with that extra money there will be an increase in the budget for experienced staffing and better equipment, right? California: We'll be able to massively increase the LAPD now

Agree! People bemoan when "immigrants take jobs" because employers can pay them less. Then think it's ok for prisoners but don't think it will incentivize employers to use prison labor???(Not to mention incentivize imprisoning more potential cheap workers)

i also feel like its still incredibly coercive - yes there's nice perks, but if you're incarcerated and given a choice between risking your life for a chance at freedom vs riding out your current sentence, it feels like less of a choice and more of a justification of exploiting ppl

I promise I'm not trying to be stubborn, but I'm sorry. When we're looking at and questioning pictures of black and brown teens in a program and a white man tells us "it's fine it worked for me" I'm left scratching my head at how quickly people have flipped and went "Oh, well maybe we were wrong!"

One success story about disenfranchisement from a white male perspective is not going to make about face that quickly. I love that these hours knock off time served too! However, while we can acknowledge that, the main issue wasn't the fact that they were sent back into the prisons.

The base monthly rate for a similar seasonal role is $3,672.00 - $4,643.00. These kids if working a full month make $336 at a max rate. Less than 10% of the low end for the same amount of work. (I'm sure it's not exactly 1:1, but still) This incentives the over policing and incarceration of poc.

I like what you’re saying in this thread, but just want to correct one point here. The most a firefighter can make in camp in a month is roughly $1050 (daily pay + incident pay). I know this doesn’t negate your larger argument, but it does allow folks to parole with a significant amount of money.

How is this not just the rebirth of convict leasing? But instead of leasing the labor to private individuals and organizations, the state is using it to offset their own labor costs. The immorality of the system is the same regardless of whom the prisoners are performing the labor for.

incentivizes* This might be a wild idea, but the compassion and rehabilitation opportunities that are given to the kids giving a 90% discount to the state should be available to all prisoners. That's my "wild" theory.