Post

This is very much a non-study. You can't be calling this a study. It's a little bit of an easy-going observation of a detail for a very short time. It has no significance. It's an impression, a superficial impression, prone to bias. I thought you had real information. However, thanks for the link.

They're both very unserious efforts and based on arbitrary bullshit by rich men who want to pretend their corporatist, right wing bias doesn't exist

Like all these people live in their own unreality bubble and they don’t care about other people and they just want to be adored media figures and ow my brain

Why does everything have to be so relentlessly disappointing?

He has zero problem with partisan bias as long as it is Republican bias. Fuck the whole concept of bias. It's just fine to have opinions.

Good way to nudge the paper in a desired direction. "Gotta keep it balanced. The AI says we're leaning left."

Nobody reads this trash anymore. And I mean nobody.

LA Times, great canary cage liner now that we know newspaper is bad for fish wrapping.

How did people this dumb and gullible get this rich without losing it all to a scam artist? Or is that what crypto is for?

The AI will be specifically tailored reflect the rich right wjng ownership bias. and even then there's entrie companies specifically dedicated to this task of determining outlet bias and trustworthiness (newsgaurd) that are comically awful at it

these guys are so high on their own farts

These tech-centric assholes use terminology to obfuscate their own bias. Oh the "algorithm" banned you. The AI picked this article as partisan, meanwhile it's just people writing the algorithms and picking the training models for the AI. It's you. You're the one doing the partisan bias.