Post

I want you to notice how this article, which took two journalists to write, doesn't even bother to seriously explore whether the claims being made by companies are true it's genuinely just not relevant to them

like, they very briefly flirt with the idea that space data centers might have logistical issues, before dismissing those concerns based on the claims of one startup that hasn't built anything yet, I ironically named after a legendary flight failure

The interest focus of U.S. "business journalism" isn't real people, labor, technology, or whether the technology even works, it's unchecked wealth accumulation. And it's not subtle.

Space X IPO journalism, pretty much universally, is comically terrible. Worse than even usual. Monday's newsletter will focus on it. Just total alternate reality fan fiction for dull LinkedIn MBA entrepreneurial hashtag hustle types

SpaceX IPO journalism is “Fast Company” for rockets.