Post

I want you to notice how this article, which took two journalists to write, doesn't even bother to seriously explore whether the claims being made by companies are true it's genuinely just not relevant to them

Semafor@semafor.com

Building data centers in space could be cost-effective by the early 2030s. www.semafor.com/article/06/1...

like, they very briefly flirt with the idea that space data centers might have logistical issues, before dismissing those concerns based on the claims of one startup that hasn't built anything yet, I ironically named after a legendary flight failure

31 reposts378 likes

The interest focus of U.S. "business journalism" isn't real people, labor, technology, or whether the technology even works, it's unchecked wealth accumulation. And it's not subtle.

Space X IPO journalism, pretty much universally, is comically terrible. Worse than even usual. Monday's newsletter will focus on it. Just total alternate reality fan fiction for dull LinkedIn MBA entrepreneurial hashtag hustle types

🤔 PSP, the Belgian entrepreneur Thomas Leysen and the media company Antenna Group are among its new investors. Semafor launched with $25 million in financing from wealthy investors, including media industry executives and the now-disgraced cryptocurrency tycoon Sam Bankman-Fried.Jan 7, 2026

Remembering all the "journalism" going on at CNBC during the frothy days of the dotcom bubble and the housing bubble. Every generation has to learn anew it seems.

This technology that's still being developed and hasn't been tested yet that's specifically for unloading supplies is a sure bet to remove broken hardware from a data center and replace it.

Replacing chips and fixing broken hardware are difficult to do in space. The solution? Robots! Robots that are also difficult to maintain and fix in space! Brilliant!

they will test unloading bags of supplies next year ——> able to replace a RAM module in a server speaking as someone who has not only worked in a server lab, but also studied robotics, yes, those are TOTALLY the same difficulty level 😆

Yes, probably because making robots that do stuff remotely in space has precedent. It's not revolutionary or disruptive technology being developed. Even getting parts up there to replace old parts is likely trivial with unmanned missions. The ignorance of heat management up there is more pressing.

Barely worth responding because of how many layers of nonsense this all is. But one of the companies referenced gave a quote about how they were planning on "putting a [Nvidia] Blackwell in space" as a test run. Well I can save you a bunch of jet fuel there...

It has no natural protection against radiation. It isnt manufactured on any of the silicon processes like FD-SOI that you use when youre building a satellite or space vehicle. Even if physically shielded, it still will face constant bit flips and fry outs from cosmic rays, solar flares etc.

And that's before you even think about the power and cooling. You'd need 60sqft+ of solar panels, and at least half as much again of liquid cooled radiator panels just to even have a chance of running ONE Blackwell in a vacuum without air convection. An almost 100sqft array enclosing ONE CHIP.