Post

this is why i stopped trying to do graphic design professionally. post is 5 years old, before AI was actually competing with graphic artists and still no one values the artistic skill that takes years-decades to hone. it reminds me of how landscaping went from being art form to minimum wage labor.

I knew a lot of Philippine artists who'd go as low as $75 then they'd just try and do dozens a month. They'd work like 12 hour days, every day. It'd why I have VERY little sympathy towards authors when they moan about book cover prices.

what seriously? If I get the residency I applied for the first thing I'm doing is setting some money aside to get a cover from one of my favourite artists, which i know will come to at least £500 *minimum*. fuck not paying people.

Growing up, I used to browse my local used book store's sci-fi/fantasy/horror sections and buy cheap old paperbacks based on how cool the cover art was. Hard to do that these days for many reasons, and it's sad.

I actively hunt down and collect all kinds of horror books like these. I always remember seeing them growing up when my grandmother would read them or just in a book store so now it’s really fun to own these cool pieces of art.

Famously wealthy people… artists. I think this person is misunderstanding that even though rich people love to /consume/ our work, they pay artists the bare minimum just like what this thread’s advocating for

Aside from the fact that design tastes and sensibilities change and now ignoring how generally authors have more creative control over book covers than before (not immediately a bad thing but not necessarily a good one either), artists are also just not being paid enough

Writers are not being paid enough too, we're all in a similar boat, but It is still worth interrogating anytime somebody uncritically asks "Why Old Thing good but New Thing bad?", because in this case it's because people are neither asking for The Old Thing or being paid enough to make The Old Thing

$200? No. Maybe if you are asking for only some color and fonts, but we charge anywhere from $600 to $3000 (or more) depending on many factors for illustrative covers.

I'd say, as someone who does this as their main gig and has for 16 years, that brand newbies should be firm on not going below that $6-800 *without* being the one doing the font and finishing. So only art, flat, period.

If they want graphic design stuff, i.e. titling, font work, etc. out of an illustrator that's two jobs and should be billed as such. I personally won't do the graphic design stuff as it's not my job, instead I refer or subcontract if I'm doing indie.

As someone who has never paid for a book cover, but has paid for other art, it feels very weird to just give a number like that as a general price for art. Maybe I'm off but as a developer this feels like asking "how much would I pay for a website?" with no details on what they actually want.

You could set a fixed price if the size and layout were always the same, and you were just swapping layers of stock art to finish it. A $200 cover is the equivalent of flash. It might actually be pretty and make you feel cool, but it's not a fully unique work of art.