Post

He was cancelled by the Romans because he was a Jew, but made a comeback after a few days, then 200 years later the Romans went woke and adopted, er Christianity. History. Odd.

Brandianity? It’s got a paradoxical dichotomical loquaciousness about it, my liege. “And it’s made Mr Winkie go right small, it has. But on the third day he rose again”.

He could fool them all too, make it look like he was cancelled in a horrifically violent way, then come back a few days later with blonde hair and blue eyes!!! Can't cancel me bichez!!!

It’s getting more and more confusing to figure out if it is the right or the left making silly comments. But I’ll just assume that the telegraph assumes the right will embrace the poor people supporting, immigrant loving, judgement deferring, forgiveness preaching Jew with a cult following.

What is the “reasoning” behind this statement? Is that Jesus would be cancelled because she thinks he’d say the utter homophobic, transphobic, racist etc bullshit “christians” indulge in? Or does she mean he’d be cancelled by the right for being “woke” (unlikely given the source)?