Post

The story around AI used to be about generating more. For many neurodivergent professionals, the bigger benefit is offloading invisible labor: remembering what you promised, the dozen tabs open in your brain, the thread you meant to reply to. ⬇️

Cue people dismissing this person's experience because it doesn't align with their worldview or their own experience

"I wouldn't be able to do what I do without these tools" is a sad and concerning statement, like a foregone conclusion or dependency. What will you do when the bubble bursts, or when negative public sentiment (or lawsuits, or regulation) causes these tools to either shutter or significantly change?

That’s a misrepresentation of what I meant so I’ll clarify: I would not be able to operate at the speed or scale at which I do now without the technology Not I am fundamentally incapable of designing, implementing, deploying, maintaining, and advertising software systems without AI

It's not a "misrepresentation." It was feedback on how your words landed to me, followed by a direct question you are avoiding. Let me rephrase: Is your speed and scale sustainable if and when these tools change or shutter? How do you reconcile the environmental and social harms of your AI usage?