Post

Huh oh. As a committed anti-conspiracy-theorist for the "phones listen to your microphone and targeted ads based on what you say" thing I can tell this is going to be exhausting

I think probably 95% of speculation that your phone is secretly listening to you is overblown, but man the tech industry really does not do itself any favors with that 5% arstechnica.com/tech-policy/...

... but since the case is being settled, I don't think we get to hear if that ended up being proven or not It's actually a detail that originates with the original lawsuit filing back in 2021 www.reuters.com/technology/a...

reuters.comApple must face Siri voice assistant privacy lawsuit -U.S. judgeA federal judge on Thursday said Apple Inc must face nearly all of a proposed class action lawsuit claiming that its voice-activated Siri assistant violates users' privacy.

1 repost17 likes

I bet that detail ends being used as "proof" that this happens from now on out, and nobody will ever try to explain how Apple's Q&A recordings of snippets of wake words were somehow fed in realtime to the world's ad networks in a way that resulted in as targeting shortly afterwards

It would be interesting to see what happened if USA congress tried to pass a law banning ad targeting via surreptitious microphone recordings, mainly because I would love to see who came out to lobby AGAINST that

That's a good take. On top of the coincidence amplification mechanism, I would add another, where Alice talks to their pal Bob about X, Bob goes on to google X, and Alice gets ads about X. I'm sure there are a number of such mechanisms at play and none of them involve eavesdropping.

I’ve always thought the truth is much creepier — we emit so much data through our online behavior and we’re predictable enough that people don’t need to eavesdrop on us to know what we’re into at the moment.

It's easy to dismiss conspiracy theories but it does not do them justice. The truth here is not the material truth about whether or not companies listen to you. The truth is what people believe these companies are capable of and willing to do.

I think it depends on the app you have open with a specific set of permissions, but I have seen at least one case that was hard to explain otherwise specifically because of the timing and the hyperspecificity of that subject to only that moment. It for sure didn't demand any on-device processing

It used to be easier to argue against this (read: still impossible) because it was trivially technically infeasible. On-device voice recognition wasn’t a thing and the bandwidth to process audio from a billion devices wouldn’t have been worth it. Now that on-device voice recognition is good, though…

Obviously what anyone has to offer is opinions but one thing is for sure: Apple is not privacy minded. They just like control on their own devices. They'll give up your privacy if profitable and as a matter of fact one of the iOS syscall gives you an advertisment ID for the user. Not white-knight-y