Post

Huh oh. As a committed anti-conspiracy-theorist for the "phones listen to your microphone and targeted ads based on what you say" thing I can tell this is going to be exhausting

I think probably 95% of speculation that your phone is secretly listening to you is overblown, but man the tech industry really does not do itself any favors with that 5% arstechnica.com/tech-policy/...

31 reposts217 likes

This has happened to me waaaaaaay too often to be mere coincidence. Especially for topics I have just talked about for the first. And! This has happened to other people around me way too often too! Like if it happened to me once or twice, maybe coincidence. It's been countless times.

I haven't actually tried to prove it (for myself I don't really have to). It's not like that rare case when something made a sound and it seemed like a ghost but actually there was an explanation to it if you investigated it. This ad stuff is waaaaaaay more common than that. All coincidences?

A lot, because I usually don't use Google products with advertising. It only happens to me with Google products, f.e. YouTube. Most of the time I'm on Bluesky, entertainment sites like Hulu/Disney, or other apps that don't have Google advertising.

But didn’t Google get caught doing the same thing a few years back? But they claimed it was ok because they did not keep specific user identifiable data? Doesn’t seem like a conspiracy for them to keep your voice/text data…whether or not it’s used for ads it’s likely that they have.

The ultimate problem is that we will never know the facts until these companies reveal the inner workings of their data collection and handling processes. It's too easy for Google and Apple to outsource their evil and simply play dumb in front of legislators and judges.

Did you miss this thread back in 2018? x.com/dylanmckaynz... Even though the OS might be locked down, FB finds ways to exfiltrate your data anyway. They take anything they can. It's not a question of whether or not they are harvesting extra data from your phone, it's a question of what and when.

Yet from they way they operate we can be certain that they would if they could. That is the issue. Are they? Maybe. Could they? Probably. Would they? Yes. That is enough to justify addressing the issue and formally investigating it. On top of the "mass hysteria" around the issue.

It's a bit like if people were reporting symptoms of poisoning after drinking a certain bottled water. The water is investigated, but no poison is found in the water. People continue to report symptoms of poisoning from that specific brand. Is the next logical step to assume the people are crazy?

My argument here is absolutely not that these companies don't invade our privacy in all kinds of weird and upsetting ways It's that targeting ads to us based on spying though our microphones is one of the few things that they do NOT do, and it's bad that so many people believe that one

It's just that it hasn't been proven yet. Given the other things they already do, we should logically assume that they DO record us somehow, via an unknown zero day or other exploit. They may even be in collusion with the two OS developers. All of this is possible and more likely than mass delusion.

Oh man, this is indeed one of those super prevalent and very hard to disprove conspiracy theories out there. I hear it all the time even from people who aren't normally into conspiracies.

It's always "we talked about X, and then I started seeing ads for X". Oftentimes it's someone else in the same household (same IP address) who looked up the thing or a related search, unbeknownst to the person making the observation. Sometimes of course it's just straight up confirmation bias.

I'd suggest one: Have the mobile OS (Android or iOS) display an indicator whenever any app is accessing the microphone. Apps should not be able to override this, but user should be able to add specific apps to allow lists to reduce noise. BlackBerry had this feature on their Android phones already.

I think the concerning part here is that online surveillance is so pervasive that people feel like their phones are spying on them—if anything, the truth is *much worse* because the ad networks are gathering data you would never dare to share even in private conversation

My playbook for explaining why in general phones are not listening: - Both Apple and Google show an indicator when third-party apps are recording and require the app to be actively used, so third-party apps cannot be listening - Apple/Google can listen (and do constantly, but immediately delete...

if a trigger word isn't activated) but those companies have a lot staked on their reputation, with a high probability of being caught if they did listen. Given those it seems unlikely that anyone is intentionally listening, and the events in the suit were probably accidental and rare.

Of course, Apple/Google and third-party apps are constantly getting as much info on you as they can, it's just that secretly recorded audio isn't part of that.

I think the truth of the matter is the quality of ad targeting that's possible just through apps sharing data on your regular actions within those apps is shockingly high... combined with the fact that it turns out just knowing "male, 40s, NYC" is often more than enough - we're all pretty basic!

I bet that detail ends being used as "proof" that this happens from now on out, and nobody will ever try to explain how Apple's Q&A recordings of snippets of wake words were somehow fed in realtime to the world's ad networks in a way that resulted in as targeting shortly afterwards

It would be interesting to see what happened if USA congress tried to pass a law banning ad targeting via surreptitious microphone recordings, mainly because I would love to see who came out to lobby AGAINST that

I was in the "this isn't happening" camp for a long time. A few nights ago, I mentioned custom home builders. I did not look them up, neither did my wife. I haven't looked into it for months, maybe years. Next morning, I'm playing a game, up pops an ad for a custom home builder.

It's a fair question, but nothing I can think of. And sure, maybe it's just an odd coincidence, but if so, it truly is an odd one. Were one of us to search one, or poke at new groups on Facebook, or anything like that, I would find it far less suspicious, but to my knowledge, no.

My answer to that is always the same: humans are pattern matching machines We are unable to consider the billion incidents when we talked about something obscure and DIDN'T see an ad for it shortly afterwards, but just one coincidence will convince us forever

Exactly this. As someone who used to work for Google, that type of activity would be completely off the table. It's simple: if you do something that stupid, it's only a matter of time before you're caught. The PR blow back is a million times worse than any ad revenue you could get.

I kinda trust that Apple doesn't intentionally do it, as they're not really in the ads business. I can believe Google doesn't do it on the system level. I don't trust that dozens of apps though, especially companion apps from some less reputable manufacturers.

I mean can you say with absolute confidence that Samsung's app doesn't? Or the Best Buy app that for no apparent reason needs microphone access? Or companion apps for dozens of Chinese consumer products? It's within the realms of possibility that none of them are spyware, but I wouldn't bet on it.

Why wouldn't they? It's possible and it makes money. All phones have a chip constantly listening for keywords ("hey Siri"). It comes for free basically. Those assistants are the most underwhelming piece of tech today. And yet no on cancelled them, even Google that cancels everything?

Definitely, they have extremely advanced control over the user's data and their own hardware platforms. Probably way more private than Google but doesn't mean they don't have side channels for money making I guess. Hard to check given the platform is so secure 🥲