Post

One more BC thread. The NDP are going to spend a lot of time figuring out what went wrong. I think Eby never found his stride as premier, and the path to leadership was where things started to go wrong. Eby wasn't used to being the bad guy, but the disqualification of Appadurai did not go over well.

18 reposts82 likes

I suppose it’s implicit- but, the communications were consistently awful. At a government level they were slow, unclear and unfocused - and occasionally nonsensical. Eby himself, like many good lawyers, was terrible at political communication. I suppose that all a function of the second guessing..

I was thinking about Appadurai this morning. I met her a few times when she was in high school with my oldest, and even back then she was impressive. Instead of Evy the the NDP establishment playing hardball with her candidacy, it might have been good let her run, then bring her into the fold.

Yep. And, even prior to that, it would have been FAR better to have someone else in the race. Eby convinced everyone to turn it into a coronation and that was the worst thing for him, both because he couldn't be tested, and it opened the door to Appadurai's successful guerrilla campaign.

Exactly. It should have been an Eby / Kahlon / Appadurai / (?) contest, where they focused on choosing a vision for governance, not on weeding out the secret Greens in the party and finding excuses to disqualify them. Having unity and a clear mandate from the party would have helped turnout.

Remember the 1996 NDP leadership race? There were 5 different faces of the NDP on stage, each showing a side of the party. By the time Clark won, we all saw something we could get behind.

Eby also came into a government that was directionless. It's not Horgan's fault he got cancer, but I think we need to denormalize top leaders disappearing for months to deal with personal crises. Cancer diagnosis should be an instant resignation.

What does that mean? Well, they have more comeback ceiling, even in four years' time, so this leadership race is going to get some good candidates. And, that potential means the Cons have to be very prudent in the type of legislation they put forward, even in the near future.

I don't think I'll ever trust them. Tryin to rob us of our democratic choices over and over is just shameful. This election was held to keep opposition down, to catch the Cons in turmoil, to kneecap CentreBC, and to take advantage of a new leader in the Greens. Same in 2020 with Furstenau.

From that point on, I think he had trouble trusting his instincts and pushing things through. The contrast between his time as AG, pushing through difficult reforms on files like ICBC and his timid, indecisive approach as premier to everything from DRIPA to decriminalization was remarkable.

eby drew no accountability–sometimes less, e.g. driving conflict–from the communities he built his personal political brand off. 'indecision' may be a generous explanation for lack of moral framework and attempts at self-serving preservation

On issues like housing, where on his watch the province made long term bets (correctly IMO!), the lack of positive response also rattled him. I think he became overly sensitive to criticism and fearful of taking a wrong step, and on many files that meant taking no meaningful steps at all.

Instead, he increasingly relied on partisan politicking. He made case less for his own government, and more against the Conservatives. This election was brazen in its opportunism, and disheartening in its deliberate polarization. Voters responded very poorly to both—esp NDP voters who stayed home.

If true, lessons for the NDP are fourfold: 1. don't short circuit leadership races. 2. Figure out what the right policy is, and push it through. 3. Make sure you find ways to convincingly tell the story of those changes. 4. Don't make it all about polarizing partisan politics. Voters HATE that.